Author Topic: Jeremy Bamber's air rifle.  (Read 7480 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Jeremy Bamber's air rifle.
« Reply #45 on: April 14, 2020, 04:15:53 PM »
Is it feasible that Essex Police impounded numerous articles, most of which were never made exhibits in the trial and stayed in a box in an evidence room until they had a clear out? Then they sought permission to re-house items with trustees nominated by Bamber?



Would explain why I got a wetsuit.  8**8:/:

Offline John

Re: Jeremy Bamber's air rifle.
« Reply #46 on: April 14, 2020, 06:19:41 PM »
I don't believe the items AA claims to have had in her possession were trial exhibits?  In which case they were not part of the evidence.

The police often seize numerous items from suspects and defendants which are subsequently returned because they are found not to have any evidential value.

Correct. If they had been exhibits the police would have retained them or destroyed them.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline John

Re: Jeremy Bamber's air rifle.
« Reply #47 on: April 14, 2020, 06:24:38 PM »
Is it feasible that Essex Police impounded numerous articles, most of which were never made exhibits in the trial and stayed in a box in an evidence room until they had a clear out? Then they sought permission to re-house items with trustees nominated by Bamber?

Absolutely. And they would deliver them too if requested.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Jeremy Bamber's air rifle.
« Reply #48 on: April 14, 2020, 06:25:00 PM »


Would explain why I got a wetsuit.  8**8:/:
What a shame you got rid.  We could have arranged for Martin Grime to set his dogs on it if you still had it.
Not a handwriting expert.