Author Topic: Kate McCann's unanswered questions.  (Read 29096 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sadie

Re: Kate McCann's unanswered questions.
« Reply #225 on: October 07, 2020, 11:05:29 PM »
Really? Is that why she said "Dr T had to walk in a southerly direction, down Rua Dr FGM, to access the entrance to his apartment block". That statement applies to neither block 4, where he was staying, or block 6, where he was not staying.

I don't mind speculation, but I do mind when it's supported by 'facts' which are not true.

You will find that I have amended my posts, but I distinctly remember us discussing, on forum the fact that Dr Totman was going back to his apartment.  He was supposed to have left the crech and was carrying his 2 yr old back to his apartment.   

I was the first to notice that he was going in the wrong direction if he had come from the crech.

What I couldn't understand either was the size of p'jays his 2 yr old was supposed to have been wearing.  They looked big enough to fit a 6 or 7 year old … and fancy keeping them all those years!

Offline faithlilly

Re: Kate McCann's unanswered questions.
« Reply #226 on: October 07, 2020, 11:33:22 PM »
With all due respect faith that image is a nonsense re the direction Jane saw Tannerman from.   She was down the hill a little looking up at him and neither was she square to him, she saw him from partly the rear.  Jane was unable to see even his face enough, or at all, because she refused to have it shown in the genuine image approved by herself.

You have to understand that images, especially of faces, change as the head moves relative to the viewer.  The image that you show has no recogniseable face, or hair, that I can see, anyhow.

Was the Mockumentary produced by your side, cos the producers have even substituted a tiny tot in place of a more robust Madeleine.  A two year old instead of a nearly 4 year old.    8)-)))



This seems to me a deliberate attempt to impose the idea that Jane saw Dr Totman, rather than Tannerman carrying Madeleine.  And that is clearly untrue.  Totmans little one was 2yr old, IIRC.  Please correct me if I am wrong on that.

The mockumentary was made by Emma Loach and with the full cooperation of the parents, Tanner and Oldfield. Tanner was there as the still was being filmed and gave it her approval.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline sadie

Re: Kate McCann's unanswered questions.
« Reply #227 on: October 09, 2020, 03:59:37 PM »
Really? Is that why she said "Dr T had to walk in a southerly direction, down Rua Dr FGM, to access the entrance to his apartment block". That statement applies to neither block 4, where he was staying, or block 6, where he was not staying.

I don't mind speculation, but I do mind when it's supported by 'facts' which are not true.

It applies to block 6, as you must well know if you are able to understand Google Earth.

Offline sadie

Re: Kate McCann's unanswered questions.
« Reply #228 on: October 09, 2020, 04:31:51 PM »
There are a myriad of reasons why Totman would be going the way he was and Redwood and his team had no problem believing that he could carry his child the way he did for some distance.

As to the child’s face and hair being visible you only have to look at the still below from the mockumentary, a still Tanner agreed was accurate with regard to the position of Madeleine, to see this is beyond argument.

https://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/sitebuilderpictures/MadeleineWasHere2.jpg

You showed this image claiming that Jane agreed to the position of Madeleine

https://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/sitebuilderpictures/MadeleineWasHere2.jpg



Jane did not see Dr Totman, but she did see Tannerman.   The man in the picture is clearly Dr Totman; he is nothing like Tannerman.   
Dr Totman was carrying his 2 year old.  Madeleine was nearly 4.  The child in the image is clearly a 2 year old.  and neither the child nor Totman look anything like Janes images.
Jane, an intelligent woman would not, could not, get Totman mixed up with Tannerman.  They are totally different.

I notice that rabid skeptic-anti 'Nigel' has plenty to do with this.  Everything that I have seen that he has produced always is twisted in some way.  He is a master at it IMO.   He is trying to pull the wool over peoples eyes that there was no abduction, just Dr Totman.

Strange that all three countries, Germany, Portugal and the UK do not agree with Anti-skeptic Nigel and say that there was an abduction.

How do you account for that Faith?

Re the position of Dr Totman crossing the road, that may well have been the same spot that she saw the moving image of Tannerman walk over and she was agreeing to that - and only that.  Why are you trying to obfuscate Faith? 


Offline G-Unit

Re: Kate McCann's unanswered questions.
« Reply #229 on: October 09, 2020, 11:03:38 PM »
It applies to block 6, as you must well know if you are able to understand Google Earth.

The entrances to blocks 4, 5 and 6 were all situated off the car parks in front of the blocks on Rua Dr Agostinho da Silva.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Anthro

Re: Kate McCann's unanswered questions.
« Reply #230 on: October 10, 2020, 09:04:58 AM »
The entrances to blocks 4, 5 and 6 were all situated off the car parks in front of the blocks on Rua Dr Agostinho da Silva.
Every apartment has a small gate entrance at the back of the blocks.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Kate McCann's unanswered questions.
« Reply #231 on: October 10, 2020, 09:24:01 AM »
Every apartment has a small gate entrance at the back of the blocks.

Every ground floor apartment I think you'll find.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0