Author Topic: The test of reasonableness  (Read 12395 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Cariad

  • Guest
Re: The test of reasonableness
« Reply #45 on: October 19, 2013, 07:50:46 PM »
When I see posters on here trying to rationalise what happened, it reminds me of a child trying to do a jigsaw...a jigsaw with pieces missing...where pieces perhaps from another jigsaw are present and are tried to be forced into place....That's why so much does not make sense

When I see posters on here trying to make totally incredible claims fit their own theory, in the most pompous manner imaginable, I often think of Rimmer.

Cariad

  • Guest
Re: The test of reasonableness
« Reply #46 on: October 19, 2013, 07:57:04 PM »
sorry pat..I have to pick you up on that...there is some evidence to support this claim...in the uk the majority of pats are female..the evidence may be weak..but it exists

Please don't post opinions as fact davel, it's very tiresome.

http://www.gpeters.com/names/baby-names.php?name=Pat&button=Go

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The test of reasonableness
« Reply #47 on: October 19, 2013, 07:58:20 PM »
When I see posters on here trying to make totally incredible claims fit their own theory, in the most pompous manner imaginable, I often think of Rimmer.

pompous is  a word I quite like...in my line of work there are many pompous, arrogant people..and they are bloody brilliant at what they do...many very talented people are pompous

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The test of reasonableness
« Reply #48 on: October 19, 2013, 08:20:02 PM »
Please don't post opinions as fact davel, it's very tiresome.

http://www.gpeters.com/names/baby-names.php?name=Pat&button=Go

posting opinion as fact...not sure if you have noticed but posting opinion as fact is endemic on this forum..if we wer e to interrupt every thread when this happened then the debates would grind to a halt. you did not object to serendipity last night doing just this , infact you supported him. so why do you follow ME round the forum trying to highlight the slightest error...the answer is obvious

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The test of reasonableness
« Reply #49 on: October 19, 2013, 09:05:20 PM »
It was you that claimed it was a myth. Perhaps the onus is on you to prove that correct.

Theres a thread this evening..with a video showing very clearly that cctv cameras face the road..so its no myth its just untrue...be careful believing what people tell you

http://news.sky.com/story/1154733/madeleine-mccann-kidnap-was-pre-planned

im pretty well right the overwhelming majority of the time
« Last Edit: October 19, 2013, 09:07:59 PM by davel »

Offline pathfinder73

Re: The test of reasonableness
« Reply #50 on: October 19, 2013, 09:53:30 PM »
When I see posters on here trying to make totally incredible claims fit their own theory, in the most pompous manner imaginable, I often think of Rimmer.


Yes it's as incredible as the moving door. SY are clever in not making a point of that in the crimewatch reconstruction.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.