Eddie and Keela - the car inspections revisited.

[Brietta]

The first time I viewed the video of the dogs in the garage despite knowing nothing of VRDs something just didn't hang right for me.
I did see the posters in the windows so that ruled out the anonymity of the car and I thought Eddie was far more interested in the wall than anything else.

Having looked at the video of the Renault in the garage again ... I think one of the things that should have been there is a date and time stamp and an official statement of start and stop times and all names of all who were present.  Indeed I think all videos which are to be presented in evidence should have that.
Does anyone know if that is a prerequisite?

Why do I think it important?

We discussed at length Cuddle Cat and the cupboard, but I think there are similar anomalies in the garage scenes.

For example after the fade in to Keela in the boot, obviously the posters have been removed from the windows of the vehicle but the vehicle itself has been moved.

This is evident by checking difference in the chevron markings on the floor of the garage in the last part of the video with Keela and the first part with Eddie.

IMO editing a tape makes it useless for use as evidence but physically moving objects like CC and a vehicle off camera without reference or explanation make it really suspect.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTF4JTLeOWA

[Mr Moderator]

For anyone who hasn't yet viewed the dogs searches here is an extended video of the event.

Car searches start at 1:11:52

[Miss Taken Identity]

Thanks for that clip Mod.

I don't think the dogs alerts would stand up as evidence in court.

In the first clip the dog knocked over a basket and what looked like cuddle cat fell out-no barking-later on the dog barked in what looks like a kitchen cupboard and cuddle cat was brought out.

I don't know what to make of it. How to interpret it. The dog certainly picked up a scent!

Could I just remind people that it was the UK police who suspected the family were not being quite helpful with regards to helping with the investigation-they suggested the dogs.

[Mr Gray]

Thanks for that clip Mod.

I don't think the dogs alerts would stand up as evidence in court.

In the first clip the dog knocked over a basket and what looked like cuddle cat fell out-no barking-later on the dog barked in what looks like a kitchen cupboard and cuddle cat was brought out.

I don't know what to make of it. How to interpret it. The dog certainly picked up a scent!

Could I just remind people that it was the UK police who suspected the family were not being quite helpful with regards to helping with the investigation-they suggested the dogs.

uk police said family should be suspects...thats standard procedure and totally acceptable...amaral  thought they said..it was the parents wot dunnit

[jassi]

uk police said family should be suspects...thats standard procedure and totally acceptable...amaral  thought they said..it was the parents wot dunnit

 So glad you've seen the light - at last   

[Mr Gray]

So glad you've seen the light - at last   

I saw the light along time ago..its a shame amaral didnt

[stephen25000]

I saw the light along time ago..its a shame amaral didnt

Now where was the light shining dave ?