Unless Caroline has been reading private messages, how can she possibly know what evidence David has. That question for David thread is really weird. She suddenly turns really aggressive for no apparent reason.
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,7600.msg357740.html#msg357740
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,7600.msg357741.html#msg357741
Hints about what the supposed breakthrough included referenced among other things that it contradicted a factual claim of the Court of Appeals. One of the assertions was that the bulk of the blood on the Bible got there from sitting in a pool of Sheila's blood. Caroline speculated that this COA assertion is what was being refuted by David and repeatedly asked questions to try to see if that is the case. David has refused to answer straight whether this is or isn't the case. His refusal to answer straight has her convinced she is right and convinces her that he is using arguments she made.
All David would need to do in order to end such speculation is to answer straight whether or not his breakthrough involved blood on the Bible. If he answers no then his breakthrough is not related to what Caroline believes. His refusal to answer this question is being taken by Caroline as a tacit admission that it is.
David often makes no sense and doesn't make any sense at all here. He said he posted about his breakthrough to spark discussion. When people try to discuss it as he said he wanted then he refuses to do so. His mentality is like a child who wants to gloat and say I have a secret I have a secret and just tease people. His supposed motivation for posting makes no sense in light of the fact he is unwilling to discuss it. My own sense is that he posted it so that just in case the defense does run with his claim and investigate it that he can brag about deserving credit for it. It wasn't to spark discussion is was to try to lay groundwork for claiming credit.
His reasons for not wanting to disclose the information are absurd. On one hand he exudes great confidence in his work. But he said he is scared to have me peer review his claims because he is scared that I will get the information out to the campaign team and then they will run with it. He says he doesn't want that to happen because he may be wrong and doesn't want them using his work to make erroneous propaganda claims. In my personal opinion what he is really scared of is them stealing his work and him not getting credit. I despise the campaign team and there is no danger of me leaking anything to them or anyone else.
The reason he cited on the board for not wanting his theory to get out is because then the government will find out about the claim sooner than they would if the claim is introduced to them in court filings and that would give them more time to disprove his theory.
First of all this is absurd. Government lawyers are not waiting for claims to come out on websites so they can then test them. They only take claims seriously and try to test them when they are made through the legal process.
But worse, David claims to be objective and said he only wants his breakthrough used by Jeremy if it is true. If that were the case he would want as many people as possible to investigate his claims to see whether they are true. Instead he wants as few people as possible to test it so that there is the least possible opportunity to be proven wrong.
David has a history of hypocrisy and illogic and this squares with that quite well. He is a staunch Jeremy advocate but tries to present himself as impartial to try to gain credibility.
The theory Caroline set forth fell apart under scrutiny and I am sure so will whatever David has conjured up.
