It has never been explained why Julian Totman was walking the wrong way?

[jassi]

What Outcome?  This far from over.

Agreed. I meant to say outcome to date.  We must patiently await any further development.

[Brietta]

Are you blind? I provided the link. Look at yourself first before commenting on others.

Actually I do suffer from a very serious progressive eye condition ... thank you for your concern.

[Robittybob1]

I have had  a week without the internet - but summing up it appears Jane Tanner appears to have said to someone she is 80% certain that the sketch drawn for Gail Cooper is similar to the man she saw passing by the street corner, but that can't be from a front on view but side on aspects of this man only.
If we have a face that is predominantly frontal view I'd say  the estimate must be more the height weight, age, clothing etc things which can be altered in appearance relatively easily.

[Brietta]

I have had  a week without the internet - but summing up it appears Jane Tanner appears to have said to someone she is 80% certain that the sketch drawn for Gail Cooper is similar to the man she saw passing by the street corner, but that can't be from a front on view but side on aspects of this man only.
If we have a face that is predominantly frontal view I'd say  the estimate must be more the height weight, age, clothing etc things which can be altered in appearance relatively easily.

Glad to have you back ... I thought maybe you were on holiday.

When 'eggman' first made his appearance I think it was as a result of lack of software capable of producing a facial side view at the time.
and  at the time'

At a later date when Madeleine's Fund commissioned an FBI trained artist to collaborate with her on producing the efit with which we are all familiar I don't think she felt confident enough to embellish her description beyond what she could recall with certainty.

Perhaps she saw enough in Gail Cooper's description to enable her to recollect memories of her own sighting?

[Robittybob1]

All I remember was that the similarity between Crecheman and Jane's actual side on drawing were "uncannily similar".   

It was never said whether JT agreed there was this similarity and whether that removed her previous 80% certainty  to the Gail Cooper sketch.

[Sunny]

Glad to have you back ... I thought maybe you were on holiday.

When 'eggman' first made his appearance I think it was as a result of lack of software capable of producing a facial side view at the time.
and  at the time'

At a later date when Madeleine's Fund commissioned an FBI trained artist to collaborate with her on producing the efit with which we are all familiar I don't think she felt confident enough to embellish her description beyond what she could recall with certainty.

Perhaps she saw enough in Gail Cooper's description to enable her to recollect memories of her own sighting?

Or perhaps seeing the Gail Cooper drawing affected her memory so she overlaid Gail's man onto her own sighting.

Facial Recognition software wouldn't help Jane, all she needed was a professional to draw up an image of the man she saw, which is what happened with Gail Cooper's sighting.

Rob it's nice to see you back, I thought you must have joined another forum or something and gone for good.