Why does the Maddie case continue to attract so much passion?

[Angelo222]

I think that as both police forces are not investigating the McCanns then I think I am most probably right

You are very wrong as we the public don't know who or what SY are investigating.  I do know though that the PJ have to investigate my complaint.

[Robittybob1]

You are very wrong as we the public don't know who or what SY are investigating.  I do know though that the PJ have to investigate my complaint.

Have to?  Why do they "have to"? 

[Mr Gray]

You are very wrong as we the public don't know who or what SY are investigating.  I do know though that the PJ have to investigate my complaint.

We know the McCanns have not been interviewed under caution... Nor, are they arguidos... So how, are they being investigated...Sutton told us they weren't too

[kizzy]

I would simply like to see it solved... Whoever is, responsible.

Sceptics seem to think posters like myself just want protect the McCanns and are emotionally involved with them... Carly thinks I'm in love with Kate... Utter tripe

I would simply like to see it solved... Whoever is, responsible.

How would you feel D if GA was right - and mcns involved.

[Mr Gray]

I would simply like to see it solved... Whoever is, responsible.

How would you feel D if GA was right - and mcns involved.

I would be totally shocked... But  have some relief it was solved... But I can't see it happening... Ga based his theory on his misunderstanding  of the evidence

[kizzy]

I would be totally shocked... But  have some relief it was solved... But I can't see it happening... Ga based his theory on his misunderstanding  of the evidence

So there was evidence then. - GA just misunderstood the evidence.

[barrier]

I would simply like to see it solved... Whoever is, responsible.

How would you feel D if GA was right - and mcns involved.

Therein imo lies the problem with OG,they cannot close and say the McCann's weren't involved to do that they must have evidence to the contrary in which case it won't close, they can (and I believe its how it will end)  say they can find no evidence against anyone.

[Robittybob1]

Therein imo lies the problem with OG,they cannot close and say the McCann's weren't involved to do that they must have evidence to the contrary in which case it won't close, they can (and I believe its how it will end)  say they can find no evidence against anyone.

That is possible unfortunately.

[Vertigo Swirl]

A valid point that should have been made nearly 6 months ago.

I made the point and I wasn’t a member of this forum 6 months ago.

[jassi]

Therein imo lies the problem with OG,they cannot close and say the McCann's weren't involved to do that they must have evidence to the contrary in which case it won't close, they can (and I believe its how it will end)  say they can find no evidence against anyone.

Or they could say they have insufficient evidence to bring anyone to court.
Dependent upon what crime has been committed OG may have no say in the matter.

[Robittybob1]

Or they could say they have insufficient evidence to bring anyone to court.
Dependent upon what crime has been committed OG may have no say in the matter.

But I doubt if they will say they have insufficient evidence to show the McCanns are innocent.

[jassi]

But I doubt if they will say they have insufficient evidence to show the McCanns are innocent.

I would agree as they might be expected to show it.

[slartibartfast]

I made the point and I wasn’t a member of this forum 6 months ago.

You were when it was discussed.

[Robittybob1]

I would agree as they might be expected to show it.

What something like a blank CD titled "Evidence against the McCanns".

[jassi]

What something like a blank CD titled "Evidence against the McCanns".

At least there would be no danger of a mistranslation claim