Return of the Inspector to the crime scene - Goncalo Interview

[Sunny]

You are, quoting an article from the sun who are reporting what Sutton said... Sutton days the McCann's were not to be interviewed under caution... Not that they were not interviewed.....

No Davel it is quite clear.

THE PARENTS of Madeleine McCann and their “Tapas Seven” holiday pals have never been quizzed as witnesses by Scotland Yard into her disappearance.

The £12million six and a half year police probe into Maddie’s feared kidnap, which is hunting “a person of significance”, has not once asked Kate and Gerry, their friends and other key witnesses, for their account on the night the youngster vanished.

They have not been interviewed as witness or under caution from what I can glean in this article. This story started life in the Times and I imagine they would be careful what they say is correct.

[Alice Purjorick]

My understanding  is that Grange, was happy that the McCann's involvement  had been satisfactorily dealt with by the Portuguese... However I'm sure as Sutton said they would realise the statements, were not totally accurate and details, could be wrong..... And that's, why they would have interviewed, the McCann's, again.. Imo

Plenty of opinion with nowt much to back it up.
Doyou believe that OG realised there were inaccuracies in the translations?  Either OG dropped off or in their considered opinion any inaccuracies were inconsequential.
OG would have interviewed the McCanns? but you don't know for sure. On what basis would OG interview the McCanns? It is a Portuguese case. OG are just bagmen in that context.

[Mr Gray]

The cite says formally interviewed.

It does... What does that mean to you.... How accurate is the article... What we do know is Sutton said no interview under caution... I would say that is what's meant by formally

[Mr Gray]

Plenty of opinion with nowt much to back it up.
Doyou believe that OG realised there were inaccuracies in the translations?  Either OG dropped off or in their considered opinion any inaccuracies were inconsequential.
OG would have interviewed the McCanns? but you don't know for sure. On what basis would OG interview the McCanns? It is a Portuguese case. OG are just bagmen in that context.

OG have interviewed several witnesses so your basic premise is incorrect

[Alice Purjorick]

OG have interviewed several witnesses so your basic premise is incorrect

Where did OG interview these witnesses?

[Mr Gray]

Where did OG interview these witnesses?

You know where

[Sunny]

It does... What doed that mean to you.... How accurate is the article... What we do know is Sutton said no interview under caution... I would say that is what's meant by formally

Mine doesn't Davel. Mine is just as valid as any other cite and it originated in the Times. If it was incorrect the Sun would remove that section from the article.

Why would it matter to you that if the McCanns and their tapas friends weren't interviewed by Operation Grange?

[Mr Gray]

Mine doesn't Davel. Mine is just as valid as any other cite and it originated in the Times. If it was incorrect the Sun would remove that section from the article.

Why would it matter to you that if the McCanns and their tapas friends weren't interviewed by Operation Grange?

you need to quote the times article then......it seems to me this story has come from suttons statement ...why do you ask if it matters to me...why should it..it is my opinion taht grange wold ahve interviwed the mccanns...you say they havent...there is no proof to support your statement apart from an ambiguous Sun article

[Eleanor]

Okay, I think that's enough of this argument.

Can we get back On Topic, please.

[Alice Purjorick]

You know where

If I knew I would not be asking you.
So where did these alleged interviews take place?

[Mr Gray]

If I knew I would not be asking you.
So where did these alleged interviews take place?

if you dont know its  a waste of time discussing the topic with you...weve been told we are off topic

[slartibartfast]

if you dont know its  a waste of time discussing the topic with you...weve been told we are off topic

Please provide a cite for post 229

[Mr Gray]

Please provide a cite for post 229

229 is not my post... How do I provide a cite for someone elses post

[slartibartfast]

229 is not my post... How do I provide a cite for someone elses post

Do not be deliberately obtuse. Provide the information requested in 229.

[Mr Gray]

Do not be deliberately obtuse. Provide the information requested in 229.

It is not a forum rule to have to answer questions