Author Topic: Jeremy Bamber - Jackie's theories on why Sheila did it  (Read 35590 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy Bamber - Jackie's theories on why Sheila did it
« Reply #75 on: March 04, 2013, 10:41:04 AM »
I meant lose access to the twins altogether.  I think social services would take Sheila running amok with a gun even if she hasn't fired it as the last straw

Offline John

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Jackie's theories on why Sheila did it
« Reply #76 on: March 04, 2013, 11:04:16 AM »
I meant lose access to the twins altogether.  I think social services would take Sheila running amok with a gun even if she hasn't fired it as the last straw

I agree with what you say Jack, but Sheila had great respect for her father and I don't believe for a minute that she would have harmed him.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Claudia

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Jackie's theories on why Sheila did it
« Reply #77 on: March 04, 2013, 01:55:24 PM »
I meant lose access to the twins altogether.  I think social services would take Sheila running amok with a gun even if she hasn't fired it as the last straw

I agree with what you say Jack, but Sheila had great respect for her father and I don't believe for a minute that she would have harmed him.


Hello all   8**8:/:

Nevill always provided a calming influence with Sheila so I find it very hard to believe she would ever have kicked of while at the farm.  Colin left her and the twins off and on the best of terms, he spoke positively of them having some sort of future together.

Offline Matthew Wyse

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Jackie's theories on why Sheila did it
« Reply #78 on: March 04, 2013, 02:03:36 PM »
I meant lose access to the twins altogether.  I think social services would take Sheila running amok with a gun even if she hasn't fired it as the last straw


She would never loose access to them altogether Jackie.  Sheila had an illness and it was under control thanks to medication so are you to deprive every mother of their children permanently cause of some moment of weakness?
Most people suspect the truth but few are able to admit it.

Offline Myster

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Jackie's theories on why Sheila did it
« Reply #79 on: March 04, 2013, 05:46:00 PM »
A good theory of why Neville would ring Jeremy first instead of the police when Sheila was running around with a gun is Neville might have hoped Jeremy could calm Sheila down because with Sheila's mental health problems if the social services had heard about the gun incident the likelihood is Sheila could probably have lost custody of her children and Neville would not have had such easy access to his only grandchildren

What a load of $@#%*! ... the last thing Nevill would be thinking about if Sheila was running amok with a loaded rifle is, "If I ring Jeremy and don't involve the police this won't get passed on from them to Social Services, who'll then whisk the boys away from Sheila !!!".

First, he'd overpower her, then disarm her if he'd not already been shot, and if he had been shot blood would be all over the phone if he ever got to use it (which he didn't).

Do you skim over my posts, Jackie?

And you forget Colin Caffell had joint custody and they would have to take custody away from him!... he'd been looking after them as well you know.

It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Jackie's theories on why Sheila did it
« Reply #80 on: March 04, 2013, 09:48:27 PM »
A good theory of why Neville would ring Jeremy first instead of the police when Sheila was running around with a gun is Neville might have hoped Jeremy could calm Sheila down because with Sheila's mental health problems if the social services had heard about the gun incident the likelihood is Sheila could probably have lost custody of her children and Neville would not have had such easy access to his only grandchildren

Hello Jackie.  I'm new here and I've been reading through some of the back posts and it appears that you are in a minority here insofar as you believe Jeremy Bamber to be innocent.  At the moment I'm undecided.  Is it possible that you can just give me some bullet points as to why you believe Jeremy to be innocent. 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy Bamber - Jackie's theories on why Sheila did it
« Reply #81 on: March 05, 2013, 07:04:26 AM »
Holly these are my reasons why I PERSONALLY believe there is reasonable doubt in this case.


Jeremy Bamber had NO history of being violent, he was known not to like blood sports. I have had contact with people he went to school with who know Jeremy's character and believe him to be innocent.
He was not bought up in a violent home.

Julie Mugford chief prosecution witness and someone who personally benefitted from Jeremy's conviction had a history of lies and deceit and even admitted saying to Jeremy 'if I can't have you nobody can'.
Julie Mugford only went to the police to say Jeremy was guilty straight after the relationship broke down.
There is not one piece of actual evidence that proves anything Julie said about Jeremy being guilty is true

Vital evidence that could have been further forensically tested has been destroyed by the police when they were told pacifically not to destroy anything in what is one of the country's most infamous murder cases

File one which relates to the time police believed it was a murder suicide has been witheld from the defence right up until today

The relatives who gained financially from Jeremy's convictions made many statements which were a deliberate attempt to blacken Jeremy's name with no actual truth to them

David Boutflour 'forgot' when giving evidence Sheila had been with the family on shooting holidays

At the time of Jeremy's conviction little was known about Sheila's illness but there has been many more cases just like Sheila, mothers who kill there children

Anti Bambers make much of Sheila being in a clean condition when found but there was a bucket of bloodied clothes found at WHF that was not taken by police or tested

Sheila had asked her husband for a reconciliation on their last journey to WHF but he rejected her saying he was with someone else

The CCRC abruptly shut down Jeremy's application to appeal not long after Simon McKay had been appointed as a new lawyer when Simon McKay was in the middle of vital tests that could have proved Jeremy was innocent.
Up until Simons appointment Jeremy was told he could have as long as he liked to make his submissions

When Jeremy was first told by the police all his family were dead his instant reaction was to blame the police and say they were responsible as he believed there had been movement in WHF when he was watching the house with the police.  If he had wanted to put the blame on Sheila why would he say this.


The Rifle
The gun used to carry out the shootings at White House Farm was a .22 Anshuttz rifle.  This rifle fires a small bullet about the size of a fingernail. There were many guns at the farm, totalling 7 if Anthony Pargeter’s bolt action rifle was also present, these included 12 bore shotguns and .410’s, most of which were kept in the cupboard under the stairs and in the downstairs toilet, although a shotgun was also found upstairs in the office and another found in the downstairs office. The rifle in question had not long been purchased by Nevill Bamber and was licensed in his name. Jeremy on the other hand did not own a gun or a license, though he would use Nevill’s rifle’s around the farm to shoot vermin.


Jeremy said that after he had an aborted mission to shoot rabbits that evening, he left the .22 Anshuttz rifle on the settle in the kitchen, he also left some ammunition and magazines out. For those who know very little about guns, this particular rifle is loaded by putting the bullets into a ‘magazine.’ The rifle was what is known as ‘self loading,’ this means that once you load the magazine into the rifle you can keep firing the gun easily over and over until the magazine is empty. The rifle had discharged 26 bullets to kill the family, as a magazine holds 10 bullets, this means it would have been loaded up to three times by Sheila, although Jeremy had already loaded one magazine and left it out on the side.

It has been postulated by the prosecution that it would have been difficult for Sheila to load and fire the weapon. Most of us do not realize exactly how easy the gun was to fire, and that it could be fired accurately at close range. All the deceased were shot within less than 4 feet. The picture to the right is a photograph of the actual gun which Sheila used to kill the family.



The DNA Evidence That Never Was
Most would agree that the only irrefutable proof you could present in the case of convicting someone of murder is that of DNA evidence. Jeremy Bamber has been imprisoned since 1985 yet no DNA or forensic evidence links him to his supposed crimes. The closest the prosecution came was a small flake of blood, found inside a sound moderator that they alleged belonged to Jeremy’s sister – ruling her out as the killer. The jury couldn’t make a unanimous verdict and asked to hear the evidence of blood in the moderator again then they convicted Jeremy by a 10 to 2 majority. This page devastatingly undermines the prosecution’s case by detailing how forensics from three different sound moderators were patched together by police and presented to the jury as findings from one exhibit.

The 2002 Appeal and the mystery of blood in the sound moderator

by J, Bamber and J, Martin-Adams, last updated 25.01.13

Part of the prosecution case against Jeremy Bamber at his trial in 1986 involved the claim that a blood flake discovered inside a sound moderator must have originated from Sheila Caffell. Supposedly, the existence of this blood meant that the sound moderator must have been attached to the rifle when the murders were carried out. However, because the moderator was later discovered in the gun cupboard, Sheila could not have committed suicide with it still attached. It is, of course, as the judge put it, ‘inconceivable’ that she could have shot herself and then unscrewed the moderator and put it away.

However, the argument concerning Sheila’s blood was undermined seriously by tests carried out prior to the 2002 appeal,
Laboratory Testing

which involved DNA testing which was not available in 1985. These tests cast doubt on the claim that Sheila’s blood had ever been present inside the moderator, prompting the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) to make a referral to the Court of Appeal during their 2001 investigation.

Background – the significance of the AK enzyme

Human blood is made up of a number of different constituents including red and white blood cells, plasma, and a number of different enzymes. In forensic science, some of these enzymes are used to make the distinction between blood samples from one person and blood samples from another. One example is the AK enzyme, which would become important in the case of Jeremy Bamber.

Human beings have two types of AK enzyme, namely, AK1 and AK2-1[1]. The blood flake discovered inside the sound moderator was analyzed and found to contain the AK1 enzyme, meaning that it could not have originated from June Bamber, whose blood contained AK2-1[2]. The blood of the other deceased family members – Nevill Bamber, Daniel Caffell and Nicholas Caffell – belonged to the AK-1 grouping. David Boutflour and Ann Eaton (the children of Robert and Pamela Boutflour) also shared the AK1 grouping: both handled Nevill Bamber’s sound moderator (DB/1) before giving it to Essex Police[3]. Sheila Caffell’s enzyme blood grouping was A, PGM 1 +, EAP BA, AK1, HP2-1: an identical match to Robert Boutflour, Jeremy’s uncle though marriage to his mother’s sister, Pamela Speakman. Both Robert and Pamela were primary beneficiaries of the estate upon the conviction of Jeremy Bamber[4].

At the 1986 trial, the Court was told that the discovery of the AK-1 enzyme constituted clear evidence that the blood flake found inside the sound moderator came from Sheila Caffell[5]. What the Court was not told was that the AK-1 enzyme found in human blood is genetically identical to the AK-1 enzyme found in the blood of pigs, cattle, rabbits, chickens and carp[6]. The rifle and the sound moderators were used to shoot game and could have been carried alongside rabbits when returning from a shoot. Had the Court been informed that two types of animal blood were found on the outer surface of the first sound moderator (SBJ/1)[7], perhaps the discovery of the AK-1 enzyme would have been attributed to animal, rather than human, blood. Given that this discovery was not disclosed until after the 2002 Appeal[8], the Court was denied the opportunity to consider the significance of this information during the 1986 trial.

The 2002 Appeal

Police records confirm that a total of three Parker Hale MM1-type sound moderators (SBJ/1; DB/1 and DRB/1) were seized by Essex Police in 1985. In preparation for the 2002 appeal, tests were carried out on one of the three moderators[9] to analyse DNA on the internal baffle plates. It is not known which of three was examined for the appeal[10]. The fact that all three moderators were mixed up and mislabelled by Essex Police caused confusion for many years, but it has now become clear which of the three was kept by the police after the trial, and which were returned to Jeremy’s cousins, Anthony Pargeter and David Boutflour.

The sound moderator retained by Essex Police was DNA tested by forensic experts working for the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) in 2001, revealing both male and female DNA on the internal baffle plates. The female DNA turned out to be a perfect match for June Bamber[11], even though her blood grouping of AK2-1 was not found inside the moderator in 1986. The results confirmed that the male DNA was not a match for Jeremy Bamber.

Giving a DNA Sample

The prosecution team tried to establish whether the sound moderator contained DNA matching Jeremy’s relatives, including David Boutflour, Robert Boutflour, Peter Eaton and Anthony Pargeter, all of whom had handled one or more of the sound moderators. With the exception of Anthony Pargeter, there is no evidence to suggest that the other male relatives agreed to provide DNA samples to be checked against the male DNA found inside the moderator[12].

At the 2002 appeal, the prosecution’s forensic experts conceded that the Crown could no longer rely on Sheila’s blood ever having been inside the sound moderator[13]. However, Mark Webster, a forensic scientist called to give evidence by the defence, argued that because the DNA found on the sound moderator could not be attributed to blood, it remains possible that the blood that was originally present on the internal baffle plates had been completely swabbed off during earlier testing, and that the DNA from June Bamber and the unknown male may have been nothing more than accidental cross-contamination[14]. In other words, the absence of Sheila’s DNA did not mean that her blood had never been present inside the sound moderator.

Obtaining Blood from a Flake

Although Mark Webster had been called to give evidence on behalf of the defence, his testimony completely undermined the argument of the defence that Sheila’s blood had never been on the sound moderator’s baffle plates, and accordingly, the appeal judges dismissed this ground of appeal based upon Mr Webster’s evidence[15]. Ironically, had Jeremy’s defence lawyers not called Mr Webster to give evidence, the appeal judges would probably have accepted the evidence given by the prosecution’s forensic experts and the appeal against conviction might have been granted.


The three sound moderators


The courts have never been presented with evidence that Essex Police actually seized three sound moderators during the original investigation. Recently disclosed evidence shows that Essex Police seized one moderator from the gun cupboard on 7 August 1985 (SBJ/1)[16]. David Boutflour discovered Nevill Bamber’s sound moderator (DB/1) on 10 August 1985, which was handed to the police by Peter and Ann Eaton on 11 September 1985[17]. David Boutflour handed in his own sound moderator (DRB/1) shortly after 25 September 1985, and this was returned to him on 20 May 1988[18]. Essex Police submitted two of these sound moderators (SBJ/1 and DRB/1) for forensic analysis, yet it was concluded that the blood, paint and DNA findings all related to one sound moderator. Although the recently unearthed evidence confirms that the results relate to two separate sound moderators[19], Essex Police somehow combined all of the forensic findings from two identical sound moderators to make the case that only one moderator was examined at Huntingdon Forensic Laboratory. At the 1986 trial, the combined evidence from SBJ/1 and DB/1 was presented as being from DRB/1, which, ironically, was the only sound moderator which had not been subject to forensic examination[20].





jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy Bamber - Jackie's theories on why Sheila did it
« Reply #82 on: March 05, 2013, 07:07:49 AM »

Another very sad case of a very ill women killing her child


A mentally ill mum killed the daughter she loved because she believed she was being ‘persecuted by their neighbours’, a court heard.

Chantelle Blake, 32, thought she was ‘protecting’ four-year-old Kaiya when she smothered her at the home they shared in Moss Side, Manchester Crown Court heard.

The child’s death was discovered days later, on September 22 last year, after Blake went to hospital after self-harming.

Asked why she had injured herself, she said ‘because I killed my daughter’, in what the court heard was a ‘remarkably matter of fact way’.

At the time, she was carrying a child’s suitcase containing the knife she had used to cut her own arms and ankles.

Police broke down the door of Blake’s neat maisonette at Garthorne Close, where pictures of Kaiya were displayed, and found the child lying in a bed.

Blake, who has been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, has now been detained under the Mental Health Act after admitting manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility.

The court heard that Blake was a caring and hard-working mum who ‘bitterly regretted’ what she had done, but did not accept that she was mentally ill.

Graham Reeds QC, prosecuting, told court that the ‘first signs’ of Miss Blake’s deterioration into ‘delusional and psychotic’ behaviour began in 2009.

In July of that year she was with Kaiya when she approached a police officer complaining of ‘domestic disharmony’.

Her ‘edgy and unpredictable’ behaviour so concerned the officer that he took her to hospital, but after psychiatric assessments it wasn’t felt that further treatment could be justified at the time.

A year later, the child’s father, who was based in Tobago but was committed to his young family, told Chantelle he couldn’t visit Manchester as planned.

He noticed a ‘change’ in her during the conversation, the court heard, with Blake convinced ‘there were those who wished her daughter harm’. Around the same time Blake was cautioned for assaulting Kaiya outside Poundstretcher in Hulme, apparently in the misguided belief she was protecting her.

In the months before Kaiya’s death Blake continued to deteriorate and an assessment was done to see whether or not she could cope during which time they were apart.

The mother and child were reunited, but the separation ‘seems to have been the catalyst for the acceleration of her delusional behaviour’, Mr Reeds said.

Judy Khan QC defending, told court: "Miss Blake does not accept presently that she is mentally ill, but she does accept that she was not in her right mind at the time of the killing her daughter. She maintains that she and her daughter were persecuted by their neighbours and she was not and never has suffered from delusions or hallucinations.

"She maintains that whatever the situation was with all those external factors she made a grave error in killing her daughter. She will bitterly regret it for the rest of her life. She did what she did out of love and fear and in a desire to protect her daughter as she felt there was nobody she could turn to and nobody who was on her side."

Miss Khan added that Blake had genuinely suffered ‘harassment’ in the build-up to Kaiya’s death.

The court heard that forensic psychiatrists were in agreement that Blake was suffering from paranoid schizophrenia. As a result was made subject to a hospital order under section 37 of the Mental Health Act, with a restriction under section 41 of the Mental Health Act.

The order is designed to allow for her treatment and prevent the risk of serious harm to the public. It means Blake cannot be discharged without consideration by a mental health tribunal or the Ministry of Justice.

Sentencing, Mr Justice McKay told her "The day you ended your daughter’s life will, I’m sure, be with you for ever. I have to ask you to understand that the purpose of this court as a result of that is not to punish you, I fully accept that you did what you did out of your love for and concern for Kaiya.

"It is the case however that your mental functioning at the time of her death was abnormal, you were thinking a distorted and deluded way, you genuinely believed you were acting to protect your daughter from harm from persons who wished her ill."

Offline Andrea

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Jackie's theories on why Sheila did it
« Reply #83 on: March 05, 2013, 08:22:36 AM »
Jack, a mentally ill woman doesnt make Bamber innocent. I could introduce you to hundreds of mentally ill women who havent killed their children.

jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy Bamber - Jackie's theories on why Sheila did it
« Reply #84 on: March 05, 2013, 08:57:18 AM »
Andrea I totally agree with you but it does happen.

I do not believe any mother would ever harm her children or kill her children unless she was very very ill

jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy Bamber - Jackie's theories on why Sheila did it
« Reply #85 on: March 05, 2013, 09:29:35 AM »
Short extracts taken from the longer summary listed further below


'30-40% of diagnosed schizophrenics attempt suicide and the use of cannabis can prolong and exacerbate the symptoms of mental illness. '

' It has been recorded that approximately 30-40% of diagnosed schizophrenics attempt suicide at some point during their lifetime and one in ten of these will succeed in taking their own lives[5]. It has also been established that people between the ages of 16-30 are more vulnerable to developing psychosis[6]. It is also within this age range that people are more likely to use cannabis[7]. '


'Sheila Caffell’s mental health issues prob
Social Services Noted Concerns

ably surfaced initially in 1981 when social workers reported injuries to her twin sons, and she was described as forgetful and disorganized' '



' Sheila was admitted as an in-patient to St. Andrews Hospital, Northampton in August 1983 following an acute breakdown[20]. During the course of her treatment, she was observed to display a number of classic ‘textbook’ delusions associated with paranoid schizophrenia, Dr Ferguson detailed that she had been in state of acute psychosis and had been for about two weeks[21]. These included religious delusions about being given the responsibility of ridding the world of evil, delusions about her children being ‘the devil’s children‘, and references to incestuous sex with her son's whom she described as 'the devil's children.'[22] '


' In March 1985, Sheila was again admitted to St Andrews Hospital following a severe psychotic episode [27]. She had suffered violent outbursts, one of which was witnessed by a friend who was left traumatised by the event[28]. During a stay of only three weeks, Sheila admitted to having used cocaine frequently[29]. It appears that Dr Ferguson did not raise the issues about Sheila harming her children because of client confidentiality. Despite the fact that Nevill was paying for the treatment, Sheila was the patient. It is also important to remember that Sheila was an 'informal' patient; that is, she was not subject to a 'section' under the Mental Health Act 1983. Therefore she was advised about her treatment but could not be legally required to comply '


' In July 1985, Sheila requested that her dose of Haloperidol be reduced. Her GP, Dr Angeloglou, contacted Dr Ferguson to discuss this for reasons unknown, but it is possible that Sheila had experienced some of the aforementioned side effects. The reduction of her dose from 200mg to 100 mg is the kind of sudden reduction which is potentially very dangerous as it may have caused severe withdrawal symptoms or even a return of the original condition, in addition to this because she was due another injection any side effects would have completely diminished[36] '





________________________

Sheila Caffell's Mental Health and the Use of Illegal Drugs
Not enough credence is given to the link between Sheila Caffell’s mental illness and her use of Cannabis and other illegal drugs. For instance 30-40% of diagnosed schizophrenics attempt suicide and the use of cannabis can prolong and exacerbate the symptoms of mental illness. Medical assessments showed Sheila Caffell displayed “textbook” delusions associated with schizophrenia, yet her state of mind and its role in the murders was constantly overlooked. Advances over the years have shown the link not only exists but also that it is wholly destructive - this comprehensive review reveals the devastating detail.




The Case of Sheila Caffell: The Effects of Illegal Drugs on People with Schizophrenia. Last updated 20.01.13

Original material by T, Whitefoot; additions by L, Lake; J, Martin-Adams; P, A, Miller.

In the early hours of 7 August 1985, five people were shot to death at White House Farm: Sheila Caffell, her twin six year old boys, and her adoptive parents, June and Nevill Bamber. Initially, Essex police believed that Sheila carried out the shootings and then committed suicide[1]. However, in the weeks that followed, that view changed and Jeremy Bamber, Sheila’s brother (also adopted, but no blood relation), was arrested and later convicted for the murders of Sheila, Nevill, June and the twins. He has since served twenty-seven years in prison for a crime which he did not commit. The purpose of this article is to explain the link between schizophrenia and cannabis and to show how Sheila Caffell’s collapsing mental health caused her to suffer a psychotic episode which resulted in the murder of her family.

Schizophrenia is a mental disorder characterised by a disintegration of the thought process, and a breakdown of
Sheila Caffell

emotional responses[2]. Most commonly, the disorder manifests itself in the form of paranoid or bizarre delusions, auditory hallucinations and/or disorganised, incoherent speech and thinking. It is believed that genetics can sometimes play a role in predisposing a person to develop the illness, but other causal factors, such as a history of mental illness and/or abuse of drugs and alcohol, have also been discussed[3]. There is no laboratory test to determine schizophrenia[4]; a diagnosis is made based on the patient’s self- reported symptoms, and a clinical assessment. It has been recorded that approximately 30-40% of diagnosed schizophrenics attempt suicide at some point during their lifetime and one in ten of these will succeed in taking their own lives[5]. It has also been established that people between the ages of 16-30 are more vulnerable to developing psychosis[6]. It is also within this age range that people are more likely to use cannabis[7].

Sheila also took Cocaine


In recent years, a great deal of research has been conducted[8] in order establish a link between schizophrenia and the effects of cannabis and other recreational drugs. Over thirty clinical studies have taken place over the past twenty years, mostly in the UK, Sweden and Australia. It is now widely believed that using cannabis can prolong the symptoms of mental illness and impede a patient’s chances of recovering from a psychotic episode[9]. If a patient has already developed schizophrenic symptoms, the continuing use of cannabis and other substances, such as alcohol or amphetamines, is believed to have a detrimental effect on their illness[10]. Set out below are two examples of the research that has been conducted so far.

1. The authors of a study published in the American Journal of Psychiatry in May 2010 conducted a study over a period of ten years. Patients were examined during the initial first period of psychiatric hospitalisation and then six months later, and then two years, four years and, finally, ten years later. At each assessment patients were rated on their psychiatric symptoms and their use of cannabis. The study concluded that cannabis use is associated with an adverse course of psychotic symptoms found in schizophrenia sufferers[11].
Cannabis Smoking


2. In a study conducted at the Zucker Hillside Hospital in New York, researchers used a special kind of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) known as Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) to measure the motion of water molecules which can indicate microscopic abnormalities in the brain. The test group included adolescents with and without schizophrenia, and adolescent users and non-users of cannabis. The MRI imaging revealed that heavy users of cannabis were found to have the type of abnormalities found in certain areas of the brain which are also found in the brains of subjects with schizophrenia[12]. These abnormalities were most pronounced in subjects with schizophrenia who were also regular users of cannabis[13]. The abnormalities occur in a pathway of the brain which is related to auditory and language functions which undergoes development during adolescence. The research suggested that if an adolescent is genetically predisposed to develop schizophrenia, the use of cannabis can cause the same type of damage to the brain’s pathway that is caused by schizophrenia Put more simply, regular and prolonged use of cannabis could kick-start the development of schizophrenia where it might otherwise not have developed at all, or cause an earlier onset of the illness, and/or cause the condition to worsen [14].

Sheila Caffell’s mental health issues prob
Social Services Noted Concerns

ably surfaced initially in 1981 when social workers reported injuries to her twin sons, and she was described as forgetful and disorganized.[15] She was referred for psychiatric treatment to Dr Ferguson in 1983, but she had been suffering from depression for eighteen months or so previously[16]. She was diagnosed as suffering from paranoid schizophrenia[17]. In addition to cannabis, she was also reported to have used other recreational drugs on occasion, such as cocaine and amphetamine[18]. Having divorced her husband Colin Caffell twelve months earlier, she was believed to have acquired considerable debts in support of her drug addiction[19].

St Andrew Mental Health Hospital

Sheila was admitted as an in-patient to St. Andrews Hospital, Northampton in August 1983 following an acute breakdown[20]. During the course of her treatment, she was observed to display a number of classic ‘textbook’ delusions associated with paranoid schizophrenia, Dr Ferguson detailed that she had been in state of acute psychosis and had been for about two weeks[21]. These included religious delusions about being given the responsibility of ridding the world of evil, delusions about her children being ‘the devil’s children‘, and references to incestuous sex with her son's whom she described as 'the devil's children.'[22].

When she was discharged one month later, having made only a partial recovery[23], Sheila had been prescribed Stelazine[24], an anti-psychotic drug which is typically the first line of defence in the treatment of schizophrenia[25]. People with schizophrenia are usually found to have high levels of dopamine activity[26]. Stelazine works by blocking dopamine receptors in the brain, thus alleviating or minimising schizophrenic symptoms of delusions, hallucinations and disorganised thought or speech. Common side effects of Stelazine are nausea, headaches, dizziness, menstrual irregularities and agitation. Major side effects are lowered life span, dyskinisia and akathisia (see glossary below).

In March 1985, Sheila was again admitted to St Andrews Hospital following a severe psychotic episode [27]. She had suffered violent outbursts, one of which was witnessed by a friend who was left traumatised by the event[28]. During a stay of only three weeks, Sheila admitted to having used cocaine frequently[29]. It appears that Dr Ferguson did not raise the issues about Sheila harming her children because of client confidentiality. Despite the fact that Nevill was paying for the treatment, Sheila was the patient. It is also important to remember that Sheila was an 'informal' patient; that is, she was not subject to a 'section' under the Mental Health Act 1983. Therefore she was advised about her treatment but could not be legally required to comply. This undoubtedly had far reaching implications.[29a]  At this time, Sheila was prescribed three kinds of medication: [30].

Anafranil - is a brand name of the chemical called Clomipramine. A tri-cyclic anti-depressant used a lot in the 1980s
Anafranil Capsules

when it was considered to be very successful in treatment depression. It typically takes 2 – 3 weeks to become effective. Caution is always required as suicide is always possible for a depressed or a disturbed patient. Side effects include confusion, agitation, insomnia and nightmares[31];

Haloperidol is the chemical name which is typically branded as Serance in the UK - a very strong anti-psychotic drug with sedative qualities. It is noted as being the most common neuroleptic associated with extra-pyramidal symptoms[32]. Clinical trials have shown that a medium to high dose of Haloperidol for a two-week period dramatically increased the dopamine activity up to 98%[33]. Long term effect is not known, but severe dyskinesia is indicated, and long-term, high-dose treatment may result in depression severe enough to result in suicide[34];

Procyclidine - often branded as Kemodrin used to counteract the effects of anti-psychotic medications. Known side effects include agitation, confusion and insomnia[35].

Additionally, there is the issue of non-compliance. It is well known that patients who are required to self-medicate will often fail to take prescribed medication for two main reasons: one is that they do not believe they are ill and therefore believe the medication is un-necessary; the second is the result of the side-effects which many individuals find to be so extreme that they would prefer to tolerate their symptoms.[35a]

In July 1985, Sheila requested that her dose of Haloperidol be reduced. Her GP, Dr Angeloglou, contacted Dr Ferguson to discuss this for reasons unknown, but it is possible that Sheila had experienced some of the aforementioned side effects. The reduction of her dose from 200mg to 100 mg is the kind of sudden reduction which is potentially very dangerous as it may have caused severe withdrawal symptoms or even a return of the original condition, in addition to this because she was due another injection any side effects would have completely diminished[36].

Sheila Caffell

At the family dinner which took place at White House Farm on the night of the murders, the subject of Sheila’s twin boys being put into foster care was raised[37]. Sheila’s psychiatrist stated that the effect of this news would have been ‘catastrophic’, and may well have been the trigger for a psychotic episode[38]. Her post-mortem results showed no trace of Anafranil, but cannabis and Haloperidol were found[39]. Failure to take some of her medication would have been exacerbated by the ingestion of cannabis and also the sudden reduction of her Haliperidol - could have caused her already fragile mental health to crumble completely.

In 1985, the public and the police were perhaps reluctant to believe that a young mother could murder her own family with such brutality. In the twenty-first century, reports of women committing violent crime, including murdering one's own children before suicide, or attempted suicide - are well documented in the media. The outcome of Jeremy Bamber’s trial may well have been different had it taken place more recently, and if the jury been made aware of research into the links between cannabis and schizophrenia. In fact, highly likely that Sheila Caffell’s life would have been saved had the advances made in understanding schizophrenia and its treatment been available in 1985.

Offline Angelo222

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Jackie's theories on why Sheila did it
« Reply #86 on: March 05, 2013, 01:18:15 PM »
Jackie, only one person knows what was discussed at the dinner table the night before the murders at White House farm and that person is Jeremy Bamber.   He could say just about anything and nobody would be any the wiser.

We will never know if the twins were discussed just as we will never know whether Sheila was going to return home and live at Goldhanger.  There is no basis for any of this discussion as it is pure speculation.

The only thing we know for sure is that Pamela spoke to Sheila on the phone before speaking to June and reported that Sheila was quiet and subdued, not exactly the vision of a mentally disturbed young woman in a rage who could have killed her family as you like to portray?

Best keep to the facts Jackie.   8(0(*
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline sika

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Jackie's theories on why Sheila did it
« Reply #87 on: March 05, 2013, 04:29:30 PM »
Jackie, how do you think Sheila managed to carry out her killing spree without displaying any forensic link, i.e. blood staining etc?
You obviously don't believe that there was enough evidence to convict Jeremy. But answer honestly, if you had to bet your last penny on who did it, who would you back?
You are obviously an intelligent woman, so surely, based on the few facts that we do know, you would have to concede that in all probability, Jeremy committed these murders rather than Shelia.
I wonder if you have a deep rooted mistrust of those in authority, as well as a tendency to 'back the underdog'.

Offline goatboy

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Jackie's theories on why Sheila did it
« Reply #88 on: March 05, 2013, 07:10:52 PM »
The fact is whoever committed the murders made a pretty good job of making themselves forensically clean, be it Sheila or Jeremy. Ask yourself this question, who had more of an incentive to make themselves forensically clean following the murders? Jeremy or Sheila? Would someone having a psychotic episode have the presence of mind to clean up so well? Who had more of an incentive to stop Nevill reaching the phone? What did Sheila have to lose by letting him get to the phone? She was going to kill herself anyway and would be long dead before the police had time to arrive.

Jackie stating Sheila took cocaine? What evidence is there for that? Hearsay surely! The fact is there were no traces of coke in her body.

Finally, the Bamber is innocent lot do bang on about Mugford's "if I can't have him no one will" statement. Don't forget that she willingly volunteered this information and that she had allegedly tried to smother him with a pillow. If she had anything to hide wouldn't she have kept this to herself? The fact is if she wanted to lie to incriminate him she should have made the lie better-ie Jeremy brazenly confessed to committing the murders himself. To me it sounds like she was just repeating what she was told.

Offline John

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Jackie's theories on why Sheila did it
« Reply #89 on: March 05, 2013, 08:50:41 PM »
The fact is whoever committed the murders made a pretty good job of making themselves forensically clean, be it Sheila or Jeremy. Ask yourself this question, who had more of an incentive to make themselves forensically clean following the murders? Jeremy or Sheila? Would someone having a psychotic episode have the presence of mind to clean up so well? Who had more of an incentive to stop Nevill reaching the phone? What did Sheila have to lose by letting him get to the phone? She was going to kill herself anyway and would be long dead before the police had time to arrive.

Jackie stating Sheila took cocaine? What evidence is there for that? Hearsay surely! The fact is there were no traces of coke in her body.

Finally, the Bamber is innocent lot do bang on about Mugford's "if I can't have him no one will" statement. Don't forget that she willingly volunteered this information and that she had allegedly tried to smother him with a pillow. If she had anything to hide wouldn't she have kept this to herself? The fact is if she wanted to lie to incriminate him she should have made the lie better-ie Jeremy brazenly confessed to committing the murders himself. To me it sounds like she was just repeating what she was told.

We must stick to the facts and goatboy is spot on.  When Dr Vanezis received Sheila's lab results back from Huntingdon they recorded a trace of Cannabis in her urine and a similar amount of the prescribed medication Haloperidol in her blood.

If Sheila had been a regular cocaine user it would have shown up on the tests.

In relation to Julie, I agree completely...she sung like a canary once she realised her future career as a teacher could very well be in jeopardy.  Julie couldn't afford to tell pork pies at that stage and she knew it.  The murder of five people must rank amongst the most serious of crimes and I am quite sure that the police laid it on the line for her.  Cooperate or face charges as an accessory to murder!
« Last Edit: March 05, 2013, 09:04:30 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.