Author Topic: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.  (Read 220686 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #270 on: November 27, 2018, 08:30:00 PM »
There is such a thing in P.R.  as pre-empting or controlling bad news. Get control of the story early on (For instance Police visiting McCanns) or spam the news with fairly innocuous stories that you know are rubbish and don't paint your client in a terrible light before something worse comes out.
 
It's a constant business of holding back unfavourable news not just one story.
Oh well, we’ll see if you’re right shortly shan’t we?  Meanwhile some of the other sceptics here think this article is bad news for the McCanns.  Go figure.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Gertrude

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #271 on: November 27, 2018, 08:32:25 PM »
Oh well, we’ll see if you’re right shortly shan’t we?

 I suppose so. 

Offline Gertrude

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #272 on: November 27, 2018, 08:34:00 PM »
Oh well, we’ll see if you’re right shortly shan’t we?  Meanwhile some of the other sceptics here think this article is bad news for the McCanns.  Go figure.

Why is that so surprising. Despite what some think of people on 'one side' all having exactly the same thought processes because we're somehow brainwashed by 'myths' and contempt...it aint true.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #273 on: November 27, 2018, 08:47:19 PM »
Oh well, we’ll see if you’re right shortly shan’t we?  Meanwhile some of the other sceptics here think this article is bad news for the McCanns.  Go figure.

We told you we're not a homogeneous group, so why the surprise? The 'article' isn't bad news, but the reaction from various sources suggests that the woke and wandered theory isn't acceptable for some reason. It seems the only acceptable theory is stranger abduction. Are the PJ or Op Grange upsetting the McCanns by investigating other theories? That's rather brave, isn't it?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline faithlilly

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #274 on: November 27, 2018, 08:51:03 PM »
We told you we're not a homogeneous group, so why the surprise? The 'article' isn't bad news, but the reaction from various sources suggests that the woke and wandered theory isn't acceptable for some reason. It seems the only acceptable theory is stranger abduction. Are the PJ or Op Grange upsetting the McCanns by investigating other theories? That's rather brave, isn't it?

Of course we know why the woke and wandered theory isn’t acceptable......can you imagine the can of worms that would open ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #275 on: November 27, 2018, 08:56:14 PM »
We told you we're not a homogeneous group, so why the surprise? The 'article' isn't bad news, but the reaction from various sources suggests that the woke and wandered theory isn't acceptable for some reason. It seems the only acceptable theory is stranger abduction. Are the PJ or Op Grange upsetting the McCanns by investigating other theories? That's rather brave, isn't it?
Rather brave of who? 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #276 on: November 27, 2018, 08:57:51 PM »
Why is that so surprising. Despite what some think of people on 'one side' all having exactly the same thought processes because we're somehow brainwashed by 'myths' and contempt...it aint true.
Iwas neither surprised, nor accusing all sceptics of having the same thought processes, you can’t all be right however.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #277 on: November 27, 2018, 08:58:17 PM »
Of course we know why the woke and wandered theory isn’t acceptable......can you imagine the can of worms that would open ?
No I can’t so why don’t you tell us?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #278 on: November 27, 2018, 09:07:34 PM »
No I can’t so why don’t you tell us?

If you like. We can start with the whooshing curtains, slamming door, open window and shutter and go from there ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #279 on: November 27, 2018, 10:05:07 PM »
If you like. We can start with the whooshing curtains, slamming door, open window and shutter and go from there ?
Can you be a bit more specific? Apparently the shutters aren’t heavy at all, so the McCanns must either have overestimated their heaviness on underestimated their daughter’s strength.  There, you see?  Can of worms emptied with no calamity caused for anyone.   ?{)(**
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #280 on: November 27, 2018, 10:21:25 PM »
Rather brave of who?

Either the PJ or Op Grange if indeed they are investigating woke and wandered. It would be brave because the McCanns said it didn't happen and they don't like being contradicted.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #281 on: November 27, 2018, 10:34:55 PM »
Either the PJ or Op Grange if indeed they are investigating woke and wandered. It would be brave because the McCanns said it didn't happen and they don't like being contradicted.
Oh, puh-lease.  You think the Met and the PJ have reason to be afraid of the McCanns do you?  Hilarious!
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Alice Purjorick

"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline faithlilly

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #283 on: November 27, 2018, 11:22:08 PM »
Can you be a bit more specific? Apparently the shutters aren’t heavy at all, so the McCanns must either have overestimated their heaviness on underestimated their daughter’s strength.  There, you see?  Can of worms emptied with no calamity caused for anyone.   ?{)(**

Fair enough, you know Madeleine’s capabilities better than her parents but there’s more....

To give any credence whatsoever to the idea that Madeleine could have walked out on her own you would have to accept that she had gone out the back way, pulling aside the sitting-room curtains and drawing them again, then opening the patio door, the child-safety gate at the top of the stairs on the veranda and the little gate to the road – and carefully closing all three behind her. What three-year-old do you know who would do that? And we knew our Madeleine. She simply would not wander off like this.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #284 on: November 27, 2018, 11:29:24 PM »
Fair enough, you know Madeleine’s capabilities better than her parents but there’s more....

To give any credence whatsoever to the idea that Madeleine could have walked out on her own you would have to accept that she had gone out the back way, pulling aside the sitting-room curtains and drawing them again, then opening the patio door, the child-safety gate at the top of the stairs on the veranda and the little gate to the road – and carefully closing all three behind her. What three-year-old do you know who would do that? And we knew our Madeleine. She simply would not wander off like this.
Do you believe that because in Kate McCann’s opinion Madeleine could not have woke and wandered that the police are going to charge her with staging an abduction?  Dream on...
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".