Very very suspicious - especially when they are supposed to be on the same side.
and
There was three witnesses, two agreed on their position, one didn’t yet the one that didn’t wouldn’t concede he was wrong. That is suspicious.
This has all been gone thru before, over and over.
1) Gerry and Jez first noticed each other when Gerry was near the gate out of 5A and Jez was on the opposite side of the road, but further down by the little car park opposite the Tapas restaurant, They walked tpwards each other at some stage crossing the road to chat. They met in the middle of the road. This is where Gerry got his impression of looking at the wall of block 6.
It was dangerous chatting there .
Maybe a car came up the road, or from the tiny car park opposite the Tapas reception? Anyway one man had to back up and Gerry did.
There were several cars parked along the kerb on the western side of the road (Stephen Carpenter words/ statement).and they backed into a gap. Gerry stood astride the western kerb, hence his recollection of a kerb and Jez stood in the roadway between two vehicles with the pram pointing downhill.
All were safe in that position, which was roughly half way between where they saw each other and as it happens was also at the entrance to the alleyway that runs between the flats and the Tapas area. Confirmed by Jane, Jez and Goncalo (in his video)
2. Gerry was in a state of panic and enormous distress and that caused a mixing of images in his mind and memory loss. He genuinely forgot the stepping back into the gap.
I have experienced similar memory loss and muddled thinking when I lost my son to cancer. My memory was blown.
Furthermore, I dont think that there was any benefit to Gerry to have disagreed with two friends; it just gave the opportunity to unthinking others to call him a liar and make out it was suspicious
All the above is in my opinion, but it is thought out and makes sense
I am not supplying any cites per se, because this has all been gone over in detail on forum several times before