Author Topic: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.  (Read 220698 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #630 on: December 06, 2018, 09:05:54 PM »
I find that strange. 'a ground floor'is actually 'a ground floor flat' in the original statement. I have wondered why Jes didn't say 'his' or 'their' flat.
Obviouly there is a word missing, when it went missing, who knows...
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #631 on: December 06, 2018, 09:06:57 PM »
I think if they had all been singing from the same song sheet without deviation ... that would have merited suspicion.

What is suspicious is when two witnesses to an event, one whose evidence you rely on elsewhere, recall things differently to you but you relentlessly stick to your recollection.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #632 on: December 06, 2018, 09:07:36 PM »
This issue more than any other drives a horse and cart through the argument that the parents wouldn’t provide untrue information that they must know would be discredited later.
???
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #633 on: December 06, 2018, 09:13:36 PM »
???
Depends on who is asking the question.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #634 on: December 06, 2018, 09:23:33 PM »
What is suspicious is when two witnesses to an event, one whose evidence you rely on elsewhere, recall things differently to you but you relentlessly stick to your recollection.
Why is that suspicious?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #635 on: December 07, 2018, 09:16:34 AM »

If one says it happened - the other one saying it didn't.

One of them is not telling the truth.

There was three witnesses, two agreed on their position, one didn’t yet the one that didn’t wouldn’t concede he was wrong. That is suspicious.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline kizzy

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #636 on: December 07, 2018, 10:05:22 AM »
There was three witnesses, two agreed on their position, one didn’t yet the one that didn’t wouldn’t concede he was wrong. That is suspicious.



Very very suspicious - especially when they are supposed to be on the same side.

Offline sadie

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #637 on: December 07, 2018, 11:59:21 AM »


Very very suspicious - especially when they are supposed to be on the same side.

and

There was three witnesses, two agreed on their position, one didn’t yet the one that didn’t wouldn’t concede he was wrong. That is suspicious.

This has all been gone thru before, over and over.

1)  Gerry and Jez first noticed each other when Gerry was near the gate out of 5A and Jez was on the opposite side of the road, but further down by the little car park opposite the Tapas restaurant,  They walked tpwards each other at some stage crossing the road to chat.  They met in the middle of the road.  This is  where Gerry got his impression of looking at the wall of block 6.

It was dangerous chatting there . 
Maybe a car came up the road, or from the tiny car park opposite the Tapas reception?  Anyway one man had to back up and Gerry did. 
There were several cars parked along the kerb on the western side of the road (Stephen Carpenter words/ statement).and they backed into a gap.   Gerry stood astride the western kerb, hence his recollection of a kerb and Jez stood in the roadway between two vehicles with the pram pointing downhill.   

All were safe in that position, which was roughly half way between where they saw each other and as it happens was also at the entrance to the alleyway that runs between the flats and the Tapas area.  Confirmed by Jane, Jez and Goncalo (in his video)


2.  Gerry was in a state of panic and enormous distress and that caused a mixing of images in his mind and memory loss.  He genuinely forgot the stepping back into the gap.



I have experienced similar memory loss and muddled thinking  when I lost my son to cancer.  My memory was blown.


Furthermore, I dont think that there was any benefit to Gerry to have disagreed with two friends; it just gave the opportunity to unthinking others to call him a liar and make out it was suspicious


All the above is in my opinion, but it is thought out and makes sense


I am not supplying any cites per se, because this has all been gone over in detail on forum several times before

Offline kizzy

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #638 on: December 07, 2018, 12:21:28 PM »

This has all been gone thru before, over and over.

1)  Gerry and Jez first noticed each other when Gerry was near the gate out of 5A and Jez was on the opposite side of the road, but further down by the little car park opposite the Tapas restaurant,  They walked tpwards each other at some stage crossing the road to chat.  They met in the middle of the road.  This is  where Gerry got his impression of looking at the wall of block 6.

It was dangerous chatting there . 
Maybe a car came up the road, or from the tiny car park opposite the Tapas reception?  Anyway one man had to back up and Gerry did. 
There were several cars parked along the kerb on the western side of the road (Stephen Carpenter words/ statement).and they backed into a gap.   Gerry stood astride the western kerb, hence his recollection of a kerb and Jez stood in the roadway between two vehicles with the pram pointing downhill.   

All were safe in that position, which was roughly half way between where they saw each other and as it happens was also at the entrance to the alleyway that runs between the flats and the Tapas area.  Confirmed by Jane, Jez and Goncalo (in his video)


2.  Gerry was in a state of panic and enormous distress and that caused a mixing of images in his mind and memory loss.  He genuinely forgot the stepping back into the gap.



I have experienced similar memory loss and muddled thinking  when I lost my son to cancer.  My memory was blown.


Furthermore, I dont think that there was any benefit to Gerry to have disagreed with two friends; it just gave the opportunity to unthinking others to call him a liar and make out it was suspicious


All the above is in my opinion, but it is thought out and makes sense


I am not supplying any cites per se, because this has all been gone over in detail on forum several times before


I have experienced similar memory loss and muddled thinking  when I lost my son to cancer.  My memory was blown.

The last hours of normality would play in your head -  like a video of what you did/happened.

I mean S lets face it his memory was perfect - when he wrote the timeline under duress.
« Last Edit: December 07, 2018, 02:06:27 PM by John »

Offline G-Unit

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #639 on: December 07, 2018, 01:25:43 PM »
Having examined all three's statements there is only one thing I believe. At some point between 8.45 and 9.15 Gerry and Jes met and chatted for a couple of minutes.
« Last Edit: December 07, 2018, 02:02:05 PM by John »
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline John

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #640 on: December 07, 2018, 02:10:09 PM »
and

This has all been gone thru before, over and over.

1)  Gerry and Jez first noticed each other when Gerry was near the gate out of 5A and Jez was on the opposite side of the road, but further down by the little car park opposite the Tapas restaurant,  They walked tpwards each other at some stage crossing the road to chat.  They met in the middle of the road.  This is  where Gerry got his impression of looking at the wall of block 6.

It was dangerous chatting there . 
Maybe a car came up the road, or from the tiny car park opposite the Tapas reception?  Anyway one man had to back up and Gerry did. 
There were several cars parked along the kerb on the western side of the road (Stephen Carpenter words/ statement).and they backed into a gap.   Gerry stood astride the western kerb, hence his recollection of a kerb and Jez stood in the roadway between two vehicles with the pram pointing downhill.   

All were safe in that position, which was roughly half way between where they saw each other and as it happens was also at the entrance to the alleyway that runs between the flats and the Tapas area.  Confirmed by Jane, Jez and Goncalo (in his video)


2.  Gerry was in a state of panic and enormous distress and that caused a mixing of images in his mind and memory loss.  He genuinely forgot the stepping back into the gap.



I have experienced similar memory loss and muddled thinking  when I lost my son to cancer.  My memory was blown.


Furthermore, I dont think that there was any benefit to Gerry to have disagreed with two friends; it just gave the opportunity to unthinking others to call him a liar and make out it was suspicious


All the above is in my opinion, but it is thought out and makes sense


I am not supplying any cites per se, because this has all been gone over in detail on forum several times before

The mind does play tricks after extreme trauma so it's not beyond the realm of possibilities that Kate lifted the shutter and slid across the window to look for Madeleine and then forgot she had done so.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #641 on: December 07, 2018, 03:31:08 PM »
The mind does play tricks after extreme trauma so it's not beyond the realm of possibilities that Kate lifted the shutter and slid across the window to look for Madeleine and then forgot she had done so.

And the slamming of the door and whooshing of the curtains ? Did she simply imagine that ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #642 on: December 07, 2018, 05:31:53 PM »
There was three witnesses, two agreed on their position, one didn’t yet the one that didn’t wouldn’t concede he was wrong. That is suspicious.
What’s suspicious about it?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #643 on: December 07, 2018, 05:33:26 PM »
Having examined all three's statements there is only one thing I believe. At some point between 8.45 and 9.15 Gerry and Jes met and chatted for a couple of minutes.
You believe they only chatted for two minutes?  Why?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline jassi

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #644 on: December 07, 2018, 05:56:57 PM »
I don't know how long they spoke for, but they were hardly bosom pals - barely knew one another, so unlikely to have conducted a deep and meaningful conversation for very long.
IMO
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future