Author Topic: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.  (Read 243382 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline The General

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1245 on: June 08, 2019, 06:17:08 PM »
Not if they had been observing the pattern all week.
If this checking was as described they would have gone elsewhere. Too many eyes, too many variables.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1246 on: June 08, 2019, 06:17:28 PM »
So why not lock it then from the inside then? It would really encumber someone for about 30 seconds.
Lock what?  The patio doors?  Wouldn’t that immediately alert the parent to the fact that something was amiss?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline The General

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1247 on: June 08, 2019, 06:19:20 PM »
Would passing the child out of the window have been more conspicuous than leaving the apartment from either door carrying the child?  I don’t see why.  The window was shielded from view by foliage and not lit.
I see why. It's totally unnatural. Walking out of the door is totally natural, that's what they're designed for.
An imbecile might, but according to the abduction narrative, ours were slick.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline barrier

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1248 on: June 08, 2019, 06:19:30 PM »
Lock what?  The patio doors?  Wouldn’t that immediately alert the parent to the fact that something was amiss?

When? Madeleine was there when Gerry checked,gone when Kate checked.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1249 on: June 08, 2019, 06:20:09 PM »
If this checking was as described they would have gone elsewhere. Too many eyes, too many variables.
No.  The parents claimed they checked on the kids every 30 minutes, that’s plenty of time.  Once you see an adult leaving the apartment at 9pm you know it’s unlikely anyone will be back until 9.30pm.  In like Flynn.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline barrier

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1250 on: June 08, 2019, 06:21:57 PM »
No.  The parents claimed they checked on the kids every 30 minutes, that’s plenty of time.  Once you see an adult leaving the apartment at 9pm you know it’s unlikely anyone will be back until 9.30pm.  In like Flynn.

GM never left the apartment at 9pm though,so the time becomes even narrower.Circa 9-10 I believe.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1251 on: June 08, 2019, 06:22:53 PM »
I see why. It's totally unnatural. Walking out of the door is totally natural, that's what they're designed for.
An imbecile might, but according to the abduction narrative, ours were slick.
Are you suggesting burglars never leave buildings via windows but will always exit via doors if possible?  Is this set in stone?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline The General

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1252 on: June 08, 2019, 06:22:58 PM »
Lock what?  The patio doors?  Wouldn’t that immediately alert the parent to the fact that something was amiss?
So what at this point? Who cares when you're in the apartment? You're committed. As I mentioned earlier, you can put barriers in the way (the shovel on the stairs). Locking the patio door buys valuable seconds to foxtrot oscar. I would even abandon the child and get on my toes.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline The General

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1253 on: June 08, 2019, 06:26:08 PM »
Are you suggesting burglars never leave buildings via windows but will always exit via doors if possible?  Is this set in stone?
But there's an uncompromised, open patio door and a simply opened front door. If your burglar was out of options he would probably launch himself through an upstairs window if he had to. But it's the easiest means possible first.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1254 on: June 08, 2019, 06:26:29 PM »
When? Madeleine was there when Gerry checked,gone when Kate checked.
I think you misunderstood.  I mean that as soon as a parent tried to open the patio door and found it locked (when they knew it had been left unlocked) they would know something was amiss.  So if an abductor locked the patio door after entering to prevent anyone else getting in while he was in there, then the person trying to open the door would be immediately alerted.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline barrier

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1255 on: June 08, 2019, 06:26:37 PM »
I see why. It's totally unnatural. Walking out of the door is totally natural, that's what they're designed for.
An imbecile might, but according to the abduction narrative, ours were slick.

There's no evidence of any one climbing out the window,if handing the child out to an accomplish the one inside must have left through either the front door or patio door,if doing that, take the child the same way,most plausible isn't it? Thats  in the unlikely scenario of at least two jimmy abductors.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline barrier

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1256 on: June 08, 2019, 06:28:15 PM »
I think you misunderstood.  I mean that as soon as a parent tried to open the patio door and found it locked (when they knew it had been left unlocked) they would know something was amiss.  So if an abductor locked the patio door after entering to prevent anyone else getting in while he was in there, then the person trying to open the door would be immediately alerted.

Kate knew something was amiss with in seconds of entering so a few seconds earlier would not have made an iota imo.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1257 on: June 08, 2019, 06:29:34 PM »
But there's an uncompromised, open patio door and a simply opened front door. If your burglar was out of options he would probably launch himself through an upstairs window if he had to. But it's the easiest means possible first.
I’ve suggested a reason why, maybe there are others.  I don’t think walking back through the apartment, through the sliding doors, down the steps and round the corner bumping into who knows whom is a very sensible move.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1258 on: June 08, 2019, 06:31:17 PM »
Kate knew something was amiss with in seconds of entering so a few seconds earlier would not have made an iota imo.
An abductor is not to know that.  Frankly I’ve never heard of a burglar or abductor locking themselves into a house they’re burgling, that seems most unlikely to me.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1259 on: June 08, 2019, 06:44:38 PM »
Sorry, your ideas don't make much sense to me.  There is no logic to them.

I think the General is one of the most logical posters here.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?