Author Topic: Sceptics beliefs ?  (Read 55020 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Erngath

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #345 on: April 05, 2019, 12:54:47 AM »
You haven't got a clue. Police can do it anyway they want. They don't need to prewarn anyone!

Yes I'm sure they do.
It's possibly the way the best way to operate an investigation.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Online pathfinder73

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #346 on: April 05, 2019, 12:55:53 AM »
They don't need to prewarn the suspect(s) or the public that would result in a media circus that could ruin an investigation!

Don't make the same mistake twice springs to mind!
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Erngath

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #347 on: April 05, 2019, 12:57:20 AM »
They don't need to prewarn the suspect(s) or the public that would result in a media circus that could ruin an investigation!

And I agree again with you.
The police will know how best to run an investigation.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Faithlilly

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #348 on: April 05, 2019, 12:57:56 AM »
Is it my ignorance you are referring to?

I believe that you are ignorant of the direction that the investigation is taking. Am I wrong ?

We have two examples of the police proclaiming that individuals were not suspects when we know they were being investigated, Prout ( thank you Pathfinder) above and the parents in August 2007. You are in denial if you donít think this again could be the case.
'She ( Kate) did, she brought it up and that she, I mean, this is awful in retrospect as well, she asked what my opinion was on, erm, tut, on whether they were okay leaving the, the doors unlocked, because she was saying 'Is it better that if Madeleine wakes up she can get out and find us or', erm, 'or locking it and, you know, finding that we're not there and the door's locked if she woke up', because Madeleine had woken up, what I thought was the night before. Erm, tut, and it was in that context really, just asking, you know, what I thought. So it was obviously something that was on her mind a bit, huh'.

Offline Faithlilly

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #349 on: April 05, 2019, 12:59:55 AM »
And I agree again with you.
The police will know how best to run an investigation.

Indeed. Quietly Iím sure would be their preferance.
'She ( Kate) did, she brought it up and that she, I mean, this is awful in retrospect as well, she asked what my opinion was on, erm, tut, on whether they were okay leaving the, the doors unlocked, because she was saying 'Is it better that if Madeleine wakes up she can get out and find us or', erm, 'or locking it and, you know, finding that we're not there and the door's locked if she woke up', because Madeleine had woken up, what I thought was the night before. Erm, tut, and it was in that context really, just asking, you know, what I thought. So it was obviously something that was on her mind a bit, huh'.

Offline Erngath

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #350 on: April 05, 2019, 01:00:12 AM »
I believe that you are ignorant of the direction that the investigation is taking. Am I wrong ?

We have two examples of the police proclaiming that individuals were not suspects when we know they were being investigated, Prout ( thank you Pathfinder) above and the parents in August 2007. You are in denial if you donít think this again could be the case.

Which investigation?
And which direction is this investigation taking?
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Erngath

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #351 on: April 05, 2019, 01:00:46 AM »
Indeed. Quietly Iím sure would be their preferance.

Of course.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Online pathfinder73

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #352 on: April 05, 2019, 01:00:57 AM »
And I agree again with you.
The police will know how best to run an investigation.

Agreed and they use tactics just as smart and sneaky as the perp(s). Their job is to solve it and how they go about it is their call.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Faithlilly

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #353 on: April 05, 2019, 01:04:49 AM »
Which investigation?
And which direction is this investigation taking?

I thought you knew.
'She ( Kate) did, she brought it up and that she, I mean, this is awful in retrospect as well, she asked what my opinion was on, erm, tut, on whether they were okay leaving the, the doors unlocked, because she was saying 'Is it better that if Madeleine wakes up she can get out and find us or', erm, 'or locking it and, you know, finding that we're not there and the door's locked if she woke up', because Madeleine had woken up, what I thought was the night before. Erm, tut, and it was in that context really, just asking, you know, what I thought. So it was obviously something that was on her mind a bit, huh'.

Offline Erngath

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #354 on: April 05, 2019, 01:07:02 AM »
Agreed and they use tactics just as smart and sneaky as the perp(s). Their job is to solve it and how they go about it is their call.

Within the bounds of the law of course.
No intimidating or threatening or even beating suspects.
As long as the correct judicial guidelines are followed.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2019, 02:03:15 AM by Brietta »
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Faithlilly

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #355 on: April 05, 2019, 01:08:09 AM »
Iíll leave you with this :

https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/college-policing-says-forces-should-name-suspects-when-charged-not-when-arrested/

But at point of arrest, the ( College of Policing ) guidance says: "Decisions must be made on a case-by-case basis but, save in clearly identified circumstances, or where legal restrictions apply, the names or identifying details of those who are arrested or suspected of a crime should not be released by police forces to the press or the public."

Why do supporters think that this would not apply to the parents ?
'She ( Kate) did, she brought it up and that she, I mean, this is awful in retrospect as well, she asked what my opinion was on, erm, tut, on whether they were okay leaving the, the doors unlocked, because she was saying 'Is it better that if Madeleine wakes up she can get out and find us or', erm, 'or locking it and, you know, finding that we're not there and the door's locked if she woke up', because Madeleine had woken up, what I thought was the night before. Erm, tut, and it was in that context really, just asking, you know, what I thought. So it was obviously something that was on her mind a bit, huh'.

Offline Erngath

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #356 on: April 05, 2019, 01:08:45 AM »
I thought you knew.

No I believe that is your perogative.
You have indicated before that you know more than any of us on this forum.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Faithlilly

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #357 on: April 05, 2019, 01:26:39 AM »
No I believe that is your perogative.
You have indicated before that you know more than any of us on this forum.

Iím not sure where you got that idea from.
'She ( Kate) did, she brought it up and that she, I mean, this is awful in retrospect as well, she asked what my opinion was on, erm, tut, on whether they were okay leaving the, the doors unlocked, because she was saying 'Is it better that if Madeleine wakes up she can get out and find us or', erm, 'or locking it and, you know, finding that we're not there and the door's locked if she woke up', because Madeleine had woken up, what I thought was the night before. Erm, tut, and it was in that context really, just asking, you know, what I thought. So it was obviously something that was on her mind a bit, huh'.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #358 on: April 05, 2019, 07:15:00 AM »
No sceptic has been able to explain exactly what aspect of the parents they think the police have been spending the last 8 years and £12 m investigating.
"The answer is that no-one here believes the parents were directly involved in MM's disappearance" - G-Unit.

Offline Davel

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #359 on: April 05, 2019, 08:01:13 AM »
If there is all this evidence against the McCann's... Whyvare they not being investigated... Why have they not been interviewed under caution by either investigation
mods can delete posts but...
The moving finger writes and having writ moves on...
nor all thy piety nor wit can lure me back to alter but  a line..nor all thy tears wash away  a word of it