Author Topic: Sceptics beliefs ?  (Read 55436 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline The General

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #990 on: April 13, 2019, 09:57:06 PM »
OK I phrased that incorrectly. Have you ever heard of any non convicted criminals begging for a police review into their alleged crimes?
Can't say I have. I do admit that there would be an element of turkeys voting for Christmas.
Most Deleted Posts 2019
Most Moderated Member 2019
Most Moderated Member 2020
On Perpetual Mod Watch

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #991 on: April 13, 2019, 10:01:19 PM »
Can't say I have. I do admit that there would be an element of turkeys voting for Christmas.

But like you said, No body, no conviction, confident the trail is stone cold.

"I bet the parents dunnit" (Me)

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #992 on: April 13, 2019, 10:17:37 PM »
But like you said, No body, no conviction, confident the trail is stone cold.

You have the backing of celebrities, pope, royalty,presidents, Prime ministers all falling over themselves once they were contacted... That is quite  a 'wing man' to have. All standing up for poor parents. and well then the supporters- that staunch army of people who think doctors are above reproach. A PR sucess story. What could possibly go wrong?    ah the Supreme  court thingy. ouch!

The philpots  wanted a press pack inteview not to find the bstrd who burned their children alive(well they didn't have to they knew already) but thanked the police and firebrigade etc for all their help- Oh  how that turned out. The police didn't tell anyone the parents were under suspicion.
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #993 on: April 13, 2019, 10:29:27 PM »
But like you said, No body, no conviction, confident the trail is stone cold.
So they got away with it but instead decided to risk reinevestigation because..?
"The answer is that no-one here believes the parents were directly involved in MM's disappearance" - G-Unit.

Offline Brietta

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #994 on: April 13, 2019, 10:31:21 PM »
But like you said, No body, no conviction, confident the trail is stone cold.

Didn't quite pan out like that for Leonor Cipriano in Amaral's previous missing child case.
The remit of Operation Grange is to investigate ...  "(as if the abduction occurred in the UK)"

Offline Erngath

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #995 on: April 13, 2019, 10:38:07 PM »
Hes got nothing to lose has he?  Hes in prison for life with no chance of being released.  The McCanns were free as birds with no one actively investigating them, please explain.

They can't.
I knew that tiger quote would appear.. (&^&
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Erngath

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #996 on: April 13, 2019, 10:39:41 PM »
So they got away with it but instead decided to risk reinevestigation because..?


Read the reasons given.
Enough to make you weep !

Or fall about laughing.!
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #997 on: April 13, 2019, 10:43:21 PM »
So they got away with it but instead decided to risk reinevestigation because..?

They wanted a review, as has been explained.
What were they supposed to do?  They couldn't just disappear into obscurity. This is the worlds most high profile missing persons case. How would that look to those bank rolling the fund?

Fund Donor -"There's no police force looking for Maddie! Really! Why not campaign to have the case reopened?"

McCanns- " Oh, err, no, it's ok, we've got private eyes & still have 2 remaining children, we'll just make do with them"

"I bet the parents dunnit" (Me)

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #998 on: April 13, 2019, 10:45:12 PM »

Read the reasons given.
Enough to make you weep !

Or fall about laughing.!
The only reason that would make any sort of sense is that they are both psychopaths, who enjoy extremely high risk actions and constantly drawing attention to their more criminal behaviour .  Spammy probably thinks they are, but most sceptics on here do seem to baulk at describing them as such, for some reason.
"The answer is that no-one here believes the parents were directly involved in MM's disappearance" - G-Unit.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #999 on: April 13, 2019, 10:45:44 PM »
Didn't quite pan out like that for Leonor Cipriano in Amaral's previous missing child case.

She's free now. I trust the McCanns will be in contact with her to offer support in the search for Joana.
They'd get along famously IMO, Like peas in a pod.
"I bet the parents dunnit" (Me)

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #1000 on: April 13, 2019, 10:46:42 PM »
They wanted a review, as has been explained.
What were they supposed to do?  They couldn't just disappear into obscurity. This is the worlds most high profile missing persons case. How would that look to those bank rolling the fund?

Fund Donor -"There's no police force looking for Maddie! Really! Why not campaign to have the case reopened?"

McCanns- " Oh, err, no, it's ok, we've got private eyes & still have 2 remaining children, we'll just make do with them"
Which Fund donor are you imagining having this conversation with the McCanns?  Were you aware of fund donors putting pressure on the McCann prior to the review?  If so, do you have cites?
"The answer is that no-one here believes the parents were directly involved in MM's disappearance" - G-Unit.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #1001 on: April 13, 2019, 10:50:06 PM »
The only reason that would make any sort of sense is that they are both psychopaths, who enjoy extremely high risk actions and constantly drawing attention to their more criminal behaviour .  Spammy probably thinks they are, but most sceptics on here do seem to baulk at describing them as such, for some reason.

I don't think they're psychopaths. I just think they are up to their bleeding necks in it.

I happen to think that the McCann's behaviour is consistent with that of a couple united in covering up a tragedy.
"I bet the parents dunnit" (Me)

Offline Erngath

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #1002 on: April 13, 2019, 10:51:24 PM »
I don't think they're psychopaths. I just think they are up to their bleeding necks in it.

I happen to think that the McCann's behaviour is consistent with that of a couple united in covering up a tragedy.


Up to their necks in what?

What is "it"?
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #1003 on: April 13, 2019, 10:54:14 PM »
Which Fund donor are you imagining having this conversation with the McCanns?  Were you aware of fund donors putting pressure on the McCann prior to the review?  If so, do you have cites?

Could be any one of them. It's only a hypothetical.

Rebekah Brooks was quite persuasive in calling for a review, as I recall.
"I bet the parents dunnit" (Me)

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #1004 on: April 13, 2019, 10:55:07 PM »

Up to their necks in what?

What is "it"?

Not abduction.
"I bet the parents dunnit" (Me)