Author Topic: E-fit lookalike?  (Read 3746 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Angelo222

Re: E-fit lookalike?
« Reply #30 on: May 06, 2019, 09:21:51 PM »
Stick to the facts Holly/Angelo. You are attempting to rewrite history as per usual  *&^^&

No, you are.  The facts are clear, BG should never have been tried for the murder of Jill Dando.

There was NO EVIDENCE against him...end off!!
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Nicholas

Re: E-fit lookalike?
« Reply #31 on: May 06, 2019, 09:26:04 PM »
William Clegg QC was BG's defence counsel at his 2nd trial and was able to convince the trial judge the particle should be ruled inadmissible which it was.  In what way do you believe the trial judge and William Clegg QC were wrong?

Refer to the prosecutors fallacy
A Lie Can Travel Halfway Around the World While the Truth Is Putting On Its Shoes

Offline Nicholas

Re: E-fit lookalike?
« Reply #32 on: May 06, 2019, 09:27:38 PM »
No, you are. 

Pantomime season is over
A Lie Can Travel Halfway Around the World While the Truth Is Putting On Its Shoes

Online Angelo222

Re: E-fit lookalike?
« Reply #33 on: May 06, 2019, 09:38:51 PM »
Pantomime season is over

I don't know why you are attempting to challenge BG's acquittal as there is no evidence he was ever involved.

Ta ta...adiós...Sayōnara.   &^&*%
« Last Edit: May 06, 2019, 09:41:38 PM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Nicholas

Re: E-fit lookalike?
« Reply #34 on: May 06, 2019, 10:01:17 PM »
I don't know why you are attempting to challenge BG's acquittal as there is no evidence he was ever involved.

Ta ta...adiós...Sayōnara.   &^&*%

In some cases one matching gunshot particle is of evidential value.

If fresh evidence becomes available Barry George could face a retrial.
A Lie Can Travel Halfway Around the World While the Truth Is Putting On Its Shoes

Offline Nicholas

Re: E-fit lookalike?
« Reply #35 on: May 07, 2019, 12:35:33 PM »
No, you are.  The facts are clear, BG should never have been tried for the murder of Jill Dando.

There was NO EVIDENCE against him...end off!!

There was and is a growing wealth of circumstantial evidence against Barry George. Your refusal to recognise is telling.
A Lie Can Travel Halfway Around the World While the Truth Is Putting On Its Shoes

Offline Nicholas

Re: E-fit lookalike?
« Reply #36 on: December 19, 2019, 12:25:52 PM »
“Photofit dispute

Mr George confirmed that he went to the offices of the Hammersmith and Fulham Action for Disability (Hafad) on the day Miss Dando was shot and returned there two days later.

He told police he had wanted to account for his movements as people had said he was similar in appearance to a photofit of the killer.

The prosecution says the photofit was only released four days after the murder.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1349115.stm

Dando accused 'set up alibi' at health centre by Nick Hopkins 15 May 2001 

The man accused of murdering Jill Dando told staff at a health centre that he was worried because he looked like the prime suspect and had been intimidated by the police on another occasion, the Old Bailey heard yesterday.

Barry George, 41, went to Hammersmith and Fulham Action for Disability (Hafad) on the day Ms Dando died in April 1999 and returned there two days later. On the first occasion, he turned up at the centre without an appointment and seemed highly agitated, the jury was told.

Elaine Hutton, the finance director of Hafad, said she had listened to parts of a conversation between George and her colleague Susan Bicknell at the office, in Greswell Street, Fulham, west London.

"I was not listening to the exact wording of the conversation between them. He was quite agitated. I was aware I might need to step in and help," said Ms Hutton.

She said George had a carrier bag of letters expressing dissatisfaction for some of the services he had received from the medical profession in general. She said her colleague had tried to stay calm and focused. She could not deal with him that day and was eventually able to placate him.

George was given an appointment for the following day, but then failed to show. However, he appeared on Wednesday April 28, two days after Ms Dando was shot.

"He said he had... gone to lay flowers at Jill's place on behalf of the church and that she was well respected in the borough," said Ms Hutton.

She said George had wanted to know the exact time of his visit to Hafad on the day Ms Dando had died. She had been unsure of the time but George had pressed her to be specific and was unhappy with her estimate.”
Read more here https://www.theguardian.com/media/2001/may/15/broadcasting.jilldando

Further excerpts
” It ran through Barry being questioned, his visit to HAFAD and Susan Bicknell’s meeting with him. It was Susan’s first day at HAFAD and she recorded the time of his visit. Two days later Barry called back asking staff to recall the exact time of his earlier visit. A week later Susan typed an account of her meeting with Barry for the police and she wrote the time of his visit as 11.50. That seriously undermined the Crown’s case that Barry shot Jill Dando after 11.30, returned home by a circuitous route to change his clothes and then went to HAFAD. There would not be enough time to do that and be at HAFAD before 12.10 according to Raphael who walked the Crown’s suggested route. But Susan revealed that at court she was unwell and suffered a breakdown shortly afterwards. She felt upset that her illness might have caused the jury to doubt her and that they might have convicted Barry as an indirect result of her illness.

Susan Bicknell says:
July 2, 2015 at 10:31 pm
“I join with Michelle Bates, in welcoming the UK’s first specialist miscarriage of justice law firm. Michelle’s brother Barry George, was my first client, on my first day (26th April 1999)at my new job of Welfare Rights Adviser at Hammersmith and Fulham Action for Disability (HAFAD). I had been working in this role elsewhere, since 1993, having originally trained in a specialist CAB Welfare Rights Unit. It was an appalling experience for me and my family, when my evidence as to where Barry was, at the time Jill Dando was murdered, was ignored. I was never given the chance to explain in my original statement to the police or in court, as to why I was so sure about the time that I met Barry, which as Scott Lomax pointed out during the 2001 trial meant that Barry could not have have committed the crime he was accused of. For anyone to spend years in prison, for a crime they have not committed, to eventually be freed and then like Barry, to not receive any compensation, beggars belief. This is not justice and it is shameful that this has happened here in the UK, not just to Barry George, but also to dozens of other innocent people.
Susan Bicknell – Welfare Rights Adviser and Disability Advocate.

The above public statement can be found at the foot of this article in the comments section
https://www.thejusticegap.com/uks-first-specialist-miscarriage-of-justice-law-firm-goes-live/
« Last Edit: December 19, 2019, 12:35:59 PM by Nicholas »
A Lie Can Travel Halfway Around the World While the Truth Is Putting On Its Shoes

Offline Nicholas

Re: E-fit lookalike?
« Reply #37 on: December 19, 2019, 12:51:21 PM »
The man accused of murdering Jill Dando told staff at a health centre that he was worried because he looked like the prime suspect 

How did Barry George KNOW he looked like the prime suspect on the day of Jill Dando’s murder if police didn’t release the E-Fit photo until 4 days after the murder?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1349115.stm
« Last Edit: December 19, 2019, 12:54:56 PM by Nicholas »
A Lie Can Travel Halfway Around the World While the Truth Is Putting On Its Shoes