Author Topic: At Last a Podcast from the Experts.  (Read 93539 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: At Last a Podcast from the Experts.
« Reply #90 on: June 03, 2019, 11:13:09 AM »
Oh Good.  I'm not very good at Cites either.

I'm simply not fond of them.

My blog posts are normally based on meticulous, extensive and mind numbing research.

That's why I prefer not to bore my readers to sleep doing a Wikipedia.
What's up, old man?

Offline Eleanor

Re: At Last a Podcast from the Experts.
« Reply #91 on: June 03, 2019, 11:16:01 AM »
I'm simply not fond of them.

My blog posts are normally based on meticulous, extensive and mind numbing research.

That's why I prefer not to bore my readers to sleep doing a Wikipedia.

I don't know.  As usual I am halfy halfy on this.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: At Last a Podcast from the Experts.
« Reply #92 on: June 03, 2019, 11:33:34 AM »
??

That doesn't ring any bells for me, John.

The Tanner / O'Brien flat didn't have a north balcony, did it?
The nearest I got to combining Jane's recollection to the Amaral theory was that Jane may have seen the man from her South facing balcony as he was walking the lane at the back of the apartments.   That would get the field of vision correct, he would walk from her left to the right, but every other detail would be wrong.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: At Last a Podcast from the Experts.
« Reply #93 on: June 03, 2019, 11:47:08 AM »
I don't know.  As usual I am halfy halfy on this.

It's an interesting thought.

I am nearly ready to post 'Liverpool Cocker Spaniel' on my blog.  If I did a Wiki, it would need at least 10 cites.

I would opine that Wiki would be vastly improved by cutting the articles to half-length and chopping out two thirds of the cites.
What's up, old man?

Offline Robittybob1

Re: At Last a Podcast from the Experts.
« Reply #94 on: June 03, 2019, 12:28:57 PM »
It's an interesting thought.

I am nearly ready to post 'Liverpool Cocker Spaniel' on my blog.  If I did a Wiki, it would need at least 10 cites.

I would opine that Wiki would be vastly improved by cutting the articles to half-length and chopping out two thirds of the cites.
And who would do that? 
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: At Last a Podcast from the Experts.
« Reply #95 on: June 03, 2019, 12:40:42 PM »
And who would do that?

Whoever fancies a rich business opportunity?
What's up, old man?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: At Last a Podcast from the Experts.
« Reply #96 on: June 03, 2019, 12:41:23 PM »
I'm simply not fond of them.

My blog posts are normally based on meticulous, extensive and mind numbing research.

That's why I prefer not to bore my readers to sleep doing a Wikipedia.

Cites, separate fact from possible fiction... That's, why they are important... They are a form of evidence
« Last Edit: June 03, 2019, 12:43:49 PM by Davel »

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: At Last a Podcast from the Experts.
« Reply #97 on: June 03, 2019, 12:56:02 PM »
Cites, separate fact from possible fiction... That's, why they are important... They are a form of evidence

Perhaps that is true for pertinent cites.  Hardly for rubbish claimed as a cite.
What's up, old man?

Offline John

Re: At Last a Podcast from the Experts.
« Reply #98 on: June 03, 2019, 12:56:47 PM »
That's news to me.

Do you have any further information you would care to share?

Looking back, he was there in May 2014 to liaise with the PJ, the first week of June 2014 searching scrubland etc and also December 2014 to question new suspects.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: At Last a Podcast from the Experts.
« Reply #99 on: June 03, 2019, 01:09:54 PM »
Perhaps that is true for pertinent cites.  Hardly for rubbish claimed as a cite.

Depends who says the cite is rubbish... Without supporting evidence.  ...that claim is rubbish

Offline John

Re: At Last a Podcast from the Experts.
« Reply #100 on: June 03, 2019, 01:10:28 PM »
??

That doesn't ring any bells for me, John.

The Tanner / O'Brien flat didn't have a north balcony, did it?

Sorry Carana, that should have been the walkway alcove on the north side.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: At Last a Podcast from the Experts.
« Reply #101 on: June 03, 2019, 01:32:19 PM »
Looking back, he was there in May 2014 to liaise with the PJ, the first week of June 2014 searching scrubland etc and also December 2014 to question new suspects.

OK.   *&(+(+

I would have thought May 2014 was in Faro or Portimão, but not Luz.

In June 2014, I watched Andy's helicopter doing circuits over Luz, with a Sky helicopter in close attendance.  As I was not really interested in the case at that time, I don't recall firsthand seeing him there, though he obviously was.

I remember a female GNR officer on perimeter duty talking to me.  I remember seeing the blonde-haired female dog handler with a long pony-tail getting her cadaver dog to search the site.  Plus more.

December 2014 was definitely in Faro, not Luz.

I don't know what OG relied on re Luz.  Perhaps LP had stuffed Holmes with all they needed.

However, AFAIK, OG has not deployed in Luz, with the exception of the digs.
What's up, old man?

Offline Eleanor

Re: At Last a Podcast from the Experts.
« Reply #102 on: June 03, 2019, 01:55:48 PM »
OK.   *&(+(+

I would have thought May 2014 was in Faro or Portimão, but not Luz.

In June 2014, I watched Andy's helicopter doing circuits over Luz, with a Sky helicopter in close attendance.  As I was not really interested in the case at that time, I don't recall firsthand seeing him there, though he obviously was.

I remember a female GNR officer on perimeter duty talking to me.  I remember seeing the blonde-haired female dog handler with a long pony-tail getting her cadaver dog to search the site.  Plus more.

December 2014 was definitely in Faro, not Luz.

I don't know what OG relied on re Luz.  Perhaps LP had stuffed Holmes with all they needed.

However, AFAIK, OG has not deployed in Luz, with the exception of the digs.

Thanks for that.  Someone from OG should have walked the streets at the very least.

Offline G-Unit

Re: At Last a Podcast from the Experts.
« Reply #103 on: June 03, 2019, 02:57:32 PM »
Details are important and there's more than one way to find/check them. The location of the night creche isn't difficult to find; it's in the files, as are maps showing it's position in relation to G5A.

I remember how Colin Sutton's team's attention to the details in the Bellfield case enabled them to place him in the vicinity of Milly Dowler's disappearance.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2019, 07:30:54 PM by Robittybob1 »
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline John

Re: At Last a Podcast from the Experts.
« Reply #104 on: June 03, 2019, 03:00:58 PM »
Thanks for that.  Someone from OG should have walked the streets at the very least.

They wouldn't want a media scrum so undoubtedly any visits to Praia da Luz were accomplished in total secrecy.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2019, 03:04:03 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.