At Last a Podcast from the Experts.

[Robittybob1]

I think everyone knows...its sunday here by the way...monday where you are..

OK but at some time after your day of rest find out what Jim Gamble did say.

[Robittybob1]

if you dont know what gamble said you shoudnt be  a mod

I study the McCann case not the Jim Gamble case.

[Robittybob1]

Cite for what Gamble actually said please.

This article has quotes of what Jim Gamble has said recently: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/780749/madeleine-mccain-2019-disappearance-news-missing-parents-wandered-off-theory

"Despite a backlash from parents Kate and Gerry, Mr Gamble believes the hypothesis has potential."  That is the wandered off theory has potential.
So we must question why Laura Richards said what Davel claims she said?

[Eleanor]

This article has quotes of what Jim Gamble has said recently: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/780749/madeleine-mccain-2019-disappearance-news-missing-parents-wandered-off-theory

"Despite a backlash from parents Kate and Gerry, Mr Gamble believes the hypothesis has potential."  That is the wandered off theory has potential.
So we must question why Laura Richards said what Davel claims she said?

I do not believe that Madeleine Woke and Wandered.  She disappeared off the face of The Earth without a trace.  Whether or not she was capable of leaving the appartment isn't really the point.  Too many other things don't hang together.

No doors or gates left open, no sight of her whatsoever, no blood on the streets and no sign of a body, ever.

I believe that Madeleine was targeted for some reason, hence the risks taken.  Paedophiles?  Definitely not.  It is all to easy to take a child from the streets.  This child was worth good money to someone.  In My Opinion.

[Miss Taken Identity]

I do not believe that Madeleine Woke and Wandered.  She disappeared off the face of The Earth without a trace.  Whether or not she was capable of leaving the appartment isn't really the point.  Too many other things don't hang together.

No doors or gates left open, no sight of her whatsoever, no blood on the streets and no sign of a body, ever.

I believe that Madeleine was targeted for some reason, hence the risks taken.  Paedophiles?  Definitely not.  It is all to easy to take a child from the streets.  This child was worth good money to someone.  In My Opinion.

Good Money? how about a ball park measure...  Millions were raised- which could have been extracted by kidknappers,and a lot of money was offered as a reward- so are we saying here that Maddie was worth many,many millions to a non paedophile gang?  Interesting theory!

[Robittybob1]

Good Money? how about a ball park measure...  Millions were raised- which could have been extracted by kidknappers,and a lot of money was offered as a reward- so are we saying here that Maddie was worth many,many millions to a non paedophile gang?  Interesting theory!

Who would value Madeleine the most?

[faithlilly]

Good Money? how about a ball park measure...  Millions were raised- which could have been extracted by kidknappers,and a lot of money was offered as a reward- so are we saying here that Maddie was worth many,many millions to a non paedophile gang?  Interesting theory!

The point is unless Madeleine is kept in seclusion, a terrible way to live, she is bound to have been identified by someone around her and for Eleanor’s theory to work not one of the individuals in the chain between the abduction and the new carers/parents would have to have been tempted by the millions put up as a reward. Is that really credible?

[Eleanor]

No one in their right mind was going to admit that they had taken Madeleine.  And they wouldn't have been entitled to the reward anyway.  That much should be obvious to anyone.

[ShiningInLuz]

The point is unless Madeleine is kept in seclusion, a terrible way to live, she is bound to have been identified by someone around her and for Eleanor’s theory to work not one of the individuals in the chain between the abduction and the new carers/parents would have to have been tempted by the millions put up as a reward. Is that really credible?

I have just finished watching a 1st anniversary docudrama about MBM's disappearance.

As part of that, Al Jazeera flew to Morocco re the Rif Mountains incorrect sighting.

The docudrama stopped several people in 3 major cities in Morocco to ask them about their opinion on the Madeleine case.  None of those shown had heard of Madeleine.

It appears not to have been big news in Morocco.

[Eleanor]

I have just finished watching a 1st anniversary docudrama about MBM's disappearance.

As part of that, Al Jazeera flew to Morocco re the Rif Mountains incorrect sighting.

The docudrama stopped several people in 3 major cities in Morocco to ask them about their opinion on the Madeleine case.  None of those shown had heard of Madeleine.

It appears not to have been big news in Morocco.

And there will be other places.

[faithlilly]

No one in their right mind was going to admit that they had taken Madeleine.  And they wouldn't have been entitled to the reward anyway.  That much should be obvious to anyone.

But there would be a chain...unless you think it was one person stealing Madeleine for one couple...or one person stealing Madeleine for themselves ( wouldn’t Amelie be a better choice? )

[Eleanor]

But there would be a chain...unless you think it was one person stealing Madeleine for one couple...or one person stealing Madeleine for themselves ( wouldn’t Amelie be a better choice? )

If there was a chain they would all likely go to prison. And none of them would get the reward.

[faithlilly]

If there was a chain they would all likely go to prison. And none of them would get the reward.

Not necessarily. If they were a colleague of the abductor but not involved in the abduction.

[Eleanor]

Not necessarily. If they were a colleague of the abductor but not involved in the abduction.

Then they would get done for perverting the course of justice.

[Miss Taken Identity]

But there would be a chain...unless you think it was one person stealing Madeleine for one couple...or one person stealing Madeleine for themselves ( wouldn’t Amelie be a better choice? )

Indeed. why steal a walking talking child when a baby was avaliable. The very idea that Maddie was worth millions to someone is rather a long way off the reality spectrum.IMO

There are easier ways to make millions with less chance getting caught, and as has been mentioned there were a lot of blonde haired little girls who could have been grabbed from street/beach/ elsewhere. To suggest Maddie was in some way more precious then the others is a nonsense.

However, we should ask the question who has these millions to purchase one specific child?