Why Should We Believe the Parent’s When....?

[Robittybob1]

What difference does giving us an explanation of the reason why they block booked the tapas make to anything.? Their booking WAS ACCEPTED on the Sunday for the whole week?

I definitely give up this time, the missus is in.
 

Hey, IMO, I believe that block booking was against the rules established between the two firms MW and OC. Someone may have bent the rules, but if a higher Manager found out the so called block booking did not exist.

Has someone from Ocean Club admitted the Tapas 9 had an approved block booking for the week?

[Parky41]

Hey, IMO, I believe that block booking was against the rules established between the two firms MW and OC. Someone may have bent the rules, but if a higher Manager found out the so called block booking did not exist.

Has someone from Ocean Club admitted the Tapas 9 had an approved block booking for the week?

It has always struck me as odd having this booked for the whole week, By their own admissions they were planning on going elsewhere that night. Why book something in advance knowing that they were going to unlikely stick to the same regime?

[Robittybob1]

It has always struck me as odd having this booked for the whole week, By their own admissions they were planning on going elsewhere that night. Why book something in advance knowing that they were going to unlikely stick to the same regime?

Bookings can be like "provisional" or "pencilled in" or "confirmed".  Even though they had a block booking they still had to ring every morning, so technically someone else could beat them to it and book in before they did.

[Vertigo Swirl]

@2.36  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFL6Jown0LE

Pretty damn good at it? Aye, getting caught.

 

They haven’t been caught, they haven’t been arrested, never mind charged, never mind found guilty.  If it ever becomes illegal to say you thought you wern’t going to get a table after making a week long booking opin the same restaurant then that might change.  Until then....

[G-Unit]

Bookings can be like "provisional" or "pencilled in" or "confirmed".  Even though they had a block booking they still had to ring every morning, so technically someone else could beat them to it and book in before they did.

Is there a cite for the bolded bit please?

[Vertigo Swirl]

The thread is titled "Why Should We believe the parents"

Now we have an admission from YOU that they said they thought they might not get into the tapas when they knew they had 'a week long booking' says it all. We can NOT believe them with an admission like that. Cheers.

It's cost you, your credibility. I just hope it's worth it.

I can live with it, don’t worry.   

[Vertigo Swirl]

It's your credibility, why should I worry?

You have to live with it, it's too late now. 

You’re getting boringly repetitive again...

[Vertigo Swirl]

And you are Miss Excitingly Original are you? 

Look, go and snuggle up to the missus instead of chatting rubbish to me, eh?  There’s a good Monkey...

[Vertigo Swirl]

I'm with him. 

Sorry, I’m not getting into a menagerie a trois with the Monkey and the Monkey’s missus.   

[Mr Gray]

and she says  too.

Imagine losing your credibility.

You can't accept anything as credible from people who are incapable accepting the truth. That's you.

Your credibility has crumbled IMO.

Pity! I did warn you.


And night night, don't let those abductors bite.

with the best intentions...how can anyone calling himself cheeky monkey talk about loss of credibility

[Robittybob1]

Rob I'm at the end of my tether with you. @2.36 until 3.38 are the words of Kate and Gerry McCann.

Sorry to say, you've just been placed on the rubber ear list. 

Fair enough but what I stated was a fact   "The words written in the video are someone's opinion not fact."

"2.36 until 3.38 are the words of Kate and Gerry McCann".   IMO are the truthful words of Gerry and Kate McCann.

[Robittybob1]

Is there a cite for the bolded bit please?

Wasn't it Rachael who had that task?  I've seen it before, and we've discussed it before.

[Vertigo Swirl]

and she says  too.

Imagine losing your credibility.

You can't accept anything as credible from people who are incapable accepting the truth. That's you.

Your credibility has crumbled IMO.

Pity! I did warn you.


And night night, don't let those abductors bite.

Anyone would think you were trying to goad me.  . As I’ve made it clear before I really am very comfortable with my perceived lack of credibility amongst the sceptic community on this forum but if you must keep going on and on about my crumbling credibility then do feel free.  It makes a change from Gerry’s credibility being called into question anyway. 

[Robittybob1]

with the best intentions...how can anyone calling himself cheeky monkey talk about loss of credibility

I think there is a rule against making fun of someone's name.  Tempting as it is.  It must at least be an ad hominem logical fallacy argument.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Wasn't it Rachael who had that task?  I've seen it before, and we've discussed it before.

You bet we have...
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7221.0
Obviously it’s a massively significant issue, one that demands repeated analysis and debate on a regular basis.