Author Topic: Why Should We Believe the Parent’s When....?  (Read 82028 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Why Should We Believe the Parent’s When....?
« Reply #540 on: June 24, 2019, 06:32:11 PM »
Yep. I’m sure that if there was another vehicle the  thorough Portuguese investigation would have uncovered it.
Thank you.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Why Should We Believe the Parent’s When....?
« Reply #541 on: June 24, 2019, 06:32:55 PM »
The McCanns claimed to have run up Black Rock, which is volcanic.

More desperate hyperbole.
And more insults from you.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline jassi

Re: Why Should We Believe the Parent’s When....?
« Reply #542 on: June 24, 2019, 06:35:53 PM »
And more insults from you.


Who's being insulted ?
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Why Should We Believe the Parent’s When....?
« Reply #543 on: June 24, 2019, 06:36:45 PM »
What's up, old man?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Why Should We Believe the Parent’s When....?
« Reply #544 on: June 24, 2019, 06:38:36 PM »

Who's being insulted ?
Me of course. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Why Should We Believe the Parent’s When....?
« Reply #545 on: June 24, 2019, 06:41:16 PM »
Goading.
May I remind you that you have accused me of being like Clarence Mitchell, of spouting propaganda, of desperation and of hysteria all in the space of the last few pages of this thread.  I would call that goading, personally.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Why Should We Believe the Parent’s When....?
« Reply #546 on: June 24, 2019, 06:41:56 PM »
That's a cross between propaganda and hysteria.

If it looks likes Clarence and it smells like Clarence and it talks like Clarence then ....

 (&^&
goading.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: Why Should We Believe the Parent’s When....?
« Reply #547 on: June 24, 2019, 06:45:10 PM »
To date, I have not been able to establish who delivered two mobiles to the Portimão PJ station on 4 May, nor why, nor how.

Someone was very quick to be a Guardian Angel in the Algarve.

Hmmm?   *%87

Something Kate forgot to mention in her book. Unless she didn't know about these phones, of course.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Lace

Re: Why Should We Believe the Parent’s When....?
« Reply #548 on: June 24, 2019, 06:47:39 PM »
Ate most of his dinner? No wonder people can't solve the case. They don't have a clue about the timeline.

by the time Russell had got back to the table err he’d err they’d err they’d cooked another steak for him, it didn’t take very long and he literally I suppose just had about two bites of it when err Kate came running
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/DIANE-WEBSTER-2.htm

Gerry wasn't in the pool area. David and Matt were the two men searching there.


Quote -

He served Russell and shortly thereafter, he was alerted to strange movements in the restaurant perimeters. He refers to the movements of two men from said group? David Payne and Matthew, who appeared to be searching the gardens the areas near the bar. The witness went to the esplanade zone and saw that the table that had previously been occupied by nine adults was now occupied only by the older woman, called Dianne Webster. It was also at this time that he saw that Russell's food was only half eaten and that the others had all finished their dinner.


Russell had eaten half of his dinner.

A waiter saw Gerry searching around the pool area.

Jeronimo Rodrigues -

On the night Madeleine disappeared, everything appeared normal. I remember that when I took notice of the disappearance, I had been in the restaurant speaking with my two colleagues?Ze and Ricardo who were on break. I returned to the restaurant and noticed that the table of nine was empty with the exception of the older woman. I went over to the table and joked with her: ?They've left you alone?? She responded more of less with these words: ?No, they went to see if the little girl was there.? I responded that I hoped they would find her somewhere in the apartment. At saying this, I saw the man. Who I knew later to be Madeleines father, running to the pool and to the childrens play area in the Tapas zone as if looking for someone. It immediately hit me that after talking to the older woman, that the little girl had not been found. I offered to alert the workers at the Milenium Restaurant and the man agreed. He then left again running to continue searching. I believe that this was between 21H30 and 22H00 but do not remember with certainty.
« Last Edit: June 24, 2019, 07:06:16 PM by Lace »

Offline faithlilly

Re: Why Should We Believe the Parent’s When....?
« Reply #549 on: June 24, 2019, 06:49:14 PM »
May I remind you that you have accused me of being like Clarence Mitchell, of spouting propaganda, of desperation and of hysteria all in the space of the last few pages of this thread.  I would call that goading, personally.

 I’d call it accurate.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Why Should We Believe the Parent’s When....?
« Reply #550 on: June 24, 2019, 06:54:31 PM »
I’d call it accurate.
More insults but glad to see you’ve finally caved in and taken me off ignore.  I really was missing your nasty comments.  @)(++(*.
Strange that you would both agree with my post and also agree that it was desperate propaganda, hysterical and desperate...  *%87
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Why Should We Believe the Parent’s When....?
« Reply #551 on: June 24, 2019, 06:55:54 PM »
I’d call it accurate.

But you are, wrong re just about everything

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Why Should We Believe the Parent’s When....?
« Reply #552 on: June 24, 2019, 07:00:30 PM »
May I remind you that you have accused me of being like Clarence Mitchell, of spouting propaganda, of desperation and of hysteria all in the space of the last few pages of this thread.  I would call that goading, personally.

My advice is to click the report to moderator button.

 &^^&*
What's up, old man?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Why Should We Believe the Parent’s When....?
« Reply #553 on: June 24, 2019, 07:01:59 PM »
My advice is to click the report to moderator button.

 &^^&*
You’re protected so there’s no point.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Why Should We Believe the Parent’s When....?
« Reply #554 on: June 24, 2019, 07:07:26 PM »

Quote -

He served Russell and shortly thereafter, he was alerted to strange movements in the restaurant perimeters. He refers to the movements of two men from said group? David Payne and Matthew, who appeared to be searching the gardens the areas near the bar. The witness went to the esplanade zone and saw that the table that had previously been occupied by nine adults was now occupied only by the older woman, called Dianne Webster. It was also at this time that he saw that Russell's food was only half eaten and that the others had all finished their dinner.


Russell had eaten half of his dinner.

A waiter saw Gerry searching around the pool area.

Yes I know but it was Matt with Dave (see in bold above). I know where Gerry was and he didn't even say he searched there in his arguido interview or any other interview.

Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.