Author Topic: Why do some believe the parents were directly involved in MM's disappearance?  (Read 28147 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Not necessarily. Holly has admitted to knowing very little and is now gathering information. Ergo, Holly is currently impartial and 'on the fence' due to lack of data to form a judgement.

We were all fencesitters originally I would say... A decision is, then made on looking at the evidence

Offline Mr Gray

I am not fond of the terms sceptic, supporter or fence-sitter, so how about I liken the forum to the House of Commons?  An equal amount of nonsense is bandied about.  In HoC parlance, I'm an Independent.

You either believe the mccanns do not know what happened to Maddie... As they say... Or you don't believe them..

Posters might not like the label but it's totally factual


Offline Mr Gray

I wasn't  talking about opnions based on evidence.

Then you accept there's nothing wrong with opinions based on evidence...

Offline The General

We were all fencesitters originally I would say... A decision is, then made on looking at the evidence
That's what I just said. I qualified your assertion that fence sitters are sceptical.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Mr Gray

That's what I just said. I qualified your assertion that fence sitters are sceptical.

They are sceptical... They may change... But if they do not believe the mccanns they are sceptics

Offline ShiningInLuz

You either believe the mccanns do not know what happened to Maddie... As they say... Or you don't believe them..

Posters might not like the label but it's totally factual

I'm not interested in beliefs.  Not the McCann beliefs nor any poster's beliefs.

Nor am I interested in labels or your apparent belief it is 'totally factual'.   *&^^&
What's up, old man?

Offline The General

They are sceptical... They may change... But if they do not believe the mccanns they are sceptics
Kinell, here we go.
Terry Waite, fresh from being chained to a radiator for 6 years in a toilet in Beirut.
He comes back and decides to reprise himself of the McCann case (timescales not correct at time of typing).
He's been in solitary for 2 years, so he knows nothing.
He's on the fence. He's not sceptical, he hasn't a clue what's going on, he's collecting data.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Mr Gray

I'm not interested in beliefs.  Not the McCann beliefs nor any poster's beliefs.

Nor am I interested in labels or your apparent belief it is 'totally factual'.   *&^^&

I can't write everything  out every post.. My beliefs are based on evidence... That's how the justice, system works..

What is, factual is that if you don't believe the mccanns you are, a, sceptic.. Like it or not

Offline G-Unit

You either believe the mccanns do not know what happened to Maddie... As they say... Or you don't believe them..

Posters might not like the label but it's totally factual

You have decided that you definitely believe them. Others have decided they definitely don't. Why can't you acknowledge that there may be some who haven't decided?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline The General

You have decided that you definitely believe them. Others have decided they definitely don't. Why can't you acknowledge that there may be some who haven't decided?
Because he's never wrong, even when he is.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Robittybob1

I've answerred this point countless times... A jury verdict is often opinion based on evidence.

Based on the evidence I come to the conclusion the McCanns are not involved... That leaves the involvement of a stranger... Either in or out of the apartment
I like that Davel - is that the first time you have conceded that woke and wandered is a possibility?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Because he's never wrong, even when he is.
I can't comment on that.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Kinell, here we go.
Terry Waite, fresh from being chained to a radiator for 6 years in a toilet in Beirut.
He comes back and decides to reprise himself of the McCann case (timescales not correct at time of typing).
He's been in solitary for 2 years, so he knows nothing.
He's on the fence. He's not sceptical, he hasn't a clue what's going on, he's collecting data.
Does he believe the parents account... Or is he sceptical of them

Offline Mr Gray

Because he's never wrong, even when he is.

I haven't said I definitely believe them.... But Im 99.9 % sure they are not involved
« Last Edit: June 18, 2019, 01:41:00 PM by slartibartfast »

Offline Mr Gray

I like that Davel - is that the first time you have conceded that woke and wandered is a possibility?

No it isn't the first time.... I've said it from the start... Look at my interpretation of the odds