Author Topic: The timeline revisited  (Read 161377 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Billy Whizz Fan Club

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #1755 on: September 04, 2021, 09:21:35 PM »
How many posters here accept it likely that the actual time of Kate's alarm was before 10pm.

Some independent witnesses suggest it may have been but....

Of the T7 in their first statements we have:

DP "Towards 10pm" (suggests before imo)
FP - Doesn't give a time.
MO - At around 10pm
RO - At around 10pm
JT - not present when alarm raised
ROB At around 10pm
DW - Doesn't say a time.

Gerry and Kate stated:
GM - At about 10pm
KM - At around 10pm






Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #1756 on: September 04, 2021, 10:52:12 PM »
How many posters here accept it likely that the actual time of Kate's alarm was before 10pm.

Some independent witnesses suggest it may have been but....

Of the T7 in their first statements we have:

DP "Towards 10pm" (suggests before imo)
FP - Doesn't give a time.
MO - At around 10pm
RO - At around 10pm
JT - not present when alarm raised
ROB At around 10pm
DW - Doesn't say a time.

Gerry and Kate stated:
GM - At about 10pm
KM - At around 10pm
Based on that I would say it was around 10pm, which would have been around half an hour after the last check which is in keeping with the pattern of the previous checks, ie on the hour and half hour.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #1757 on: September 04, 2021, 11:11:48 PM »
Based on that I would say it was around 10pm, which would have been around half an hour after the last check which is in keeping with the pattern of the previous checks, ie on the hour and half hour.

Well, according to the archival summary "they didn't check on them like they afterwards declared they did".

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/LEGAL_SUMMARY.htm
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #1758 on: September 04, 2021, 11:59:49 PM »
Well, according to the archival summary "they didn't check on them like they afterwards declared they did".

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/LEGAL_SUMMARY.htm
Oh?  So when did they check on them?  The archival summary must have proof of the actual times, let’s hear it.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #1759 on: September 05, 2021, 12:09:08 AM »
Oh?  So when did they check on them?  The archival summary must have proof of the actual times, let’s hear it.

No one has proof of the actual times, had you not noticed?


Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #1760 on: September 05, 2021, 09:12:54 AM »
No one has proof of the actual times, had you not noticed?
but the archiving summary which you quoted says
“they didn't check on them like they afterwards declared they did”
So upon what basis did they arrive at this conclusion?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #1761 on: September 05, 2021, 09:41:32 AM »
Based on that I would say it was around 10pm, which would have been around half an hour after the last check which is in keeping with the pattern of the previous checks, ie on the hour and half hour.

One thing which puzzles me is that Matthew Oldfield was 'in tune' with the McCanns. He checked his daughter at 9pm and 9.30pm. He was also due to check at 10pm therefore, but he didn't. He said;

Russell came back and we started chatting, you know, how's Evie and all that sort of thing, erm, so, I think he was still eating at the time, so we waited until he'd finished before we went'.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MATTHEW-OLDFIELD-ROGATORY.htm

Of course Russell didn't need to check at 10pm because Jane was in his apartment.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #1762 on: September 05, 2021, 09:45:17 AM »
One thing which puzzles me is that Matthew Oldfield was 'in tune' with the McCanns. He checked his daughter at 9pm and 9.30pm. He was also due to check at 10pm therefore, but he didn't. He said;

Russell came back and we started chatting, you know, how's Evie and all that sort of thing, erm, so, I think he was still eating at the time, so we waited until he'd finished before we went'.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MATTHEW-OLDFIELD-ROGATORY.htm

Of course Russell didn't need to check at 10pm because Jane was in his apartment.
I don’t understand.  At 10pm other things were going on, that they hadn’t anticipated.  What’s puzzling you?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #1763 on: September 05, 2021, 10:03:06 AM »

And off we go again on this not so bright Sunday morning.

Rinse and Repeat ad infinitum.

Offline barrier

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #1764 on: September 05, 2021, 10:04:52 AM »
And off we go again on this not so bright Sunday morning.

Rinse and Repeat ad infinitum.


Give over, what else would you be doing if you didn't have it to read.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #1765 on: September 05, 2021, 10:15:05 AM »
I don’t understand.  At 10pm other things were going on, that they hadn’t anticipated.  What’s puzzling you?

That Matthew, who was due to check his daughter at the same time as Kate, didn't.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #1766 on: September 05, 2021, 10:32:33 AM »
That Matthew, who was due to check his daughter at the same time as Kate, didn't.
I don’t think they were in a pact that meant they had to leave the table at exactly the same time.  I expect tongues would have wagged even harder in some circles if they had!
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #1767 on: September 05, 2021, 10:57:40 AM »
And off we go again on this not so bright Sunday morning.

Rinse and Repeat ad infinitum.

The weather here is bright and sunny.  8(>((
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #1768 on: September 05, 2021, 11:01:59 AM »

Give over, what else would you be doing if you didn't have it to read.

Christ knows.  Fourteen years.  Staggering home after hours of cutting the lawns of absent owners just to earn a crust.  What's not to like about the awful problems of the really benighted.  People who have had worse things to deal with than I ever have.

Be thankful for small mercies.

Offline Eleanor

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #1769 on: September 05, 2021, 11:03:39 AM »
The weather here is bright and sunny.  8(>((

Thanks a bunch.  Global Warming seems to have missed Brittany.  Again.