Author Topic: The timeline revisited  (Read 161330 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sadie

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #390 on: June 28, 2019, 05:40:51 PM »
What trace evidence would you expect the perp to leave behind? 

We don't know what the motive would have been for abduction or anything about the perp eg previous or post offending. 

If the perp entered with the intention of abducting MM then I don't see why he/she would want to harm the twins in the apartment or be concerned they were now in a room with a window/shutter open?  If the person had a conscience and sense of morality he/she would not have entered 5a let alone abduct a child.

I think it is kinder to use the name Madeleine than MM or MBM.    The later two depersonalize her.


As a matter of courtesy to her, I think her correct name should be used.


Sorry this is late. 

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #391 on: June 28, 2019, 05:40:59 PM »
Leaving small chidren home alone is stupid. Not locking them in is even more stupid. Yet the McCanns say that;s what they did. They also say that someone opened the shutter and window for no apparent reason. In my opinion they should have been surprised if no one commented, not surprised that people dud. I've never heard such a load of rubbish in my life. Claiming that MBM was abducted is just more of the same imo.
You seem to be putting emotion ahead of reason in this post, I thought you were above that tbh.  What is “a load of rubbish” and why is it “a load of rubbish”? 
« Last Edit: June 28, 2019, 05:50:38 PM by Vertigo Swirl »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #392 on: June 28, 2019, 05:43:10 PM »
Instead it casts doubt on woke and wandered. So if it was staged who might want to do that?
Obviously not the McCanns as they “un-staged” it before the police arrived which I think even you have acknowledged makes no sense at all.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #393 on: June 28, 2019, 05:46:25 PM »
Sedation has been a feature of the case. As far as I can gather this idea was driven by MBM's mother. I am therefore led to wonder why? One possible explanation is that an autopsy would have found sedatives in the body had it been found.

The time of the alarm isn't confirmed by any independent witnesses. DW's evidence tells us that one of the parents was unaccounted for until 15 minutes after the alarm was raised.
DW?  Were both McCanns absent from the table when the alarm was raised?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #394 on: June 28, 2019, 08:09:23 PM »
You seem to think abduction is the only danger parents need to worry about when leaving children home alone. It's not, there are many dangers which make it unacceptable. Dangers which passers by wouldn't prevent.
Such as?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #395 on: June 28, 2019, 08:22:33 PM »
I bet that little slogan made the criminal fraternity's kecks roll up.
Kecks??/ WTF is that?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #396 on: June 28, 2019, 08:26:53 PM »
Please explain.
Answers from Pathfinder are rare indeed.  "It is simple as Smithman's identity will prove".
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #397 on: June 29, 2019, 10:48:01 PM »
Sedation has been a feature of the case. As far as I can gather this idea was driven by MBM's mother. I am therefore led to wonder why? One possible explanation is that an autopsy would have found sedatives in the body had it been found.

The time of the alarm isn't confirmed by any independent witnesses. DW's evidence tells us that one of the parents was unaccounted for until 15 minutes after the alarm was raised.

Yes indeed. Post mortems reveal many things- hence  reasons why bodies are disposed of.

People now getting upset about using Initials . Oh boy.   Many interviews by the loving parents we were told about a 'little girl' is missing- and Gerry spelling his daughters name wrong and Kate with her Capital missing... whatever next!
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline sadie

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #398 on: June 29, 2019, 11:39:58 PM »
Yes indeed. Post mortems reveal many things- hence  reasons why bodies are disposed of.

People now getting upset about using Initials . Oh boy.   Many interviews by the loving parents we were told about a 'little girl' is missing- and Gerry spelling his daughters name wrong and Kate with her Capital missing... whatever next!

Have you any idea how callous you sound?


Have you any idea what the loss of Madeleine would do to her parents?   

In my case despite the fact that I was expecting my sons death [brain tumor],.. but then 6 weeks after his death, took up a commitment to a job that had kindly been kept open for me. 

I would be teaching on the mezzanine floor and need some materials from the floor half above ... just a matter of some 5 steps up and a distance of about 20 feet ... and by the time I got there I had forgotten what i had come for.

This didn't happen every time, but it happened frequently and it went on, only easing somewhat after the 1st anniversary of his death.   Madeleines parents minds must have been reeling:  racing thoughts, periods of blankness; it must have been terrible ... and then to suffer the hatred from people who were ignorant of facts and yet were prepared to make their lives even more abismal by continually spreading malicious disinformation about them

To be frank, Mistaken, I find your criticism of the Mccanns in such a position very callous


Your thoughtless disdain of Madeleine shows clearly by your repeated use of her initials rather than name.  Does this abuse put you on a high, I wonder?

Offline Angelo222

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #399 on: June 29, 2019, 11:58:18 PM »
I think it is kinder to use the name Madeleine than MM or MBM.    The later two depersonalize her.


As a matter of courtesy to her, I think her correct name should be used.


Sorry this is late.

I think you are being too picky Sadie. I always refer to her as Maddie, am I being discourteous too?
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Angelo222

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #400 on: June 30, 2019, 12:07:03 AM »
Regardless of their claimed best intentions, the checking didn't always happen every 30 minutes as evidenced by Mrs Fenn's account of what occurred on the night of the 1st May. When the McCanns and the others put pen to paper in order to give credibility to their checking regime, they weren't aware that the woman who was resident two floors above the McCann's apartment was keeping tabs on their comings and goings. The ironic aspect about all this however is that had Mrs Fenn reported the children crying to the resort manager as she was minded to do, the child might not have disappeared two nights later.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2019, 12:14:06 AM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Brietta

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #401 on: June 30, 2019, 12:14:51 AM »
Regardless of their claimed best intentions, the checking didn't always happen every 30 minutes as evidenced by Mrs Fenn's account of what occurred on the night of the 1st May.

I might have gone for that one had there been any proof given of the phone call made to her friend Edna Glynn if the phone records backed it up ... but they don't do they?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #402 on: June 30, 2019, 12:19:08 AM »
I might have gone for that one had there been any proof given of the phone call made to her friend Edna Glynn if the phone records backed it up ... but they don't do they?
Do you know Mrs Fenn's and Edna's phone numbers?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #403 on: June 30, 2019, 12:23:29 AM »
I might have gone for that one had there been any proof given of the phone call made to her friend Edna Glynn if the phone records backed it up ... but they don't do they?

What phone records for 1st May?
What's up, old man?

Offline Brietta

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #404 on: June 30, 2019, 12:30:04 AM »
What phone records for 1st May?

The same phone records which enabled scrutiny of Malinka, Murat and uncle Tom Cobley n'all phone calls which have concentrated the minds of the denizens of internet fora for the past twelve years.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....