The timeline revisited

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

Are you suggesting that The McCanns made this up?

I was making the point to VS that their original account of events was not elaborate. It was very simple. Madeleine had been abducted by a paedophile who broke in through the shuttered window. It was quickly established that this was not what happened.

[Mr Gray]

I was making the point to VS that their original account of events was not elaborate. It was very simple. Madeleine had been abducted by a paedophile who broke in through the shuttered window. It was quickly established that this was not what happened.

It hasnt been established as not happening

[Vertigo Swirl]

I was making the point to VS that their original account of events was not elaborate. It was very simple. Madeleine had been abducted by a paedophile who broke in through the shuttered window. It was quickly established that this was not what happened.

No it hasn’t.

[G-Unit]

Kates statement.. And the fact that translations can often be innaccurate. You speculate they are 100 per cent accurate...it isnt a fact.that they are. You think they are accurate... You believe they are accurate

Maybe this one's wrong too;

Meanwhile a man appeared ( * ) carrying a child (**), with a hurried walk, it being this detail together with the fact that the child dressed in pyjamas, without being wrapped up in a blanket, that caught her attention. She only managed to see him from the side, with the child in his arms. She noticed the individual's presence exactly when she had just passed by Gerry and Jez who were talking, having seen this person step off the pavement that borders on the apartment block where they were staying and rapidly cross the road.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JANE-TANNER.htm

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

It hasnt been established as not happening

It was quickly accepted that this did not happen. Even by Clarence Mitchell. It was quickly found that there was no evidence to support the shuttered window being the entry point.

[Mr Gray]

It was quickly accepted that this did not happen. Even by Clarence Mitchell. It was quickly found that there was no evidence to support the shuttered window being the entry point.

Not true...its totally credible it was the entry point

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

Not true...its totally credible it was the entry point

Even Clarence Mitchell concedes there in no evidence to support a scenario of entry via the window.

And aside from the lack of evidence why did the abductor enter through the shuttered window then close the shutters before or after opening the bedroom door wider twice….. before finally opening the shutters again to perform an almost impossible act of leaving through the window with a child in their arms having hung around the apartment for 50 minutes yet still avoiding detection during two checks. The McCanns themselves no longer maintain that the entry point was the shuttered window. This scenario makes no sense and is not supported by any evidence.

[Eleanor]

It was quickly accepted that this did not happen. Even by Clarence Mitchell. It was quickly found that there was no evidence to support the shuttered window being the entry point.

There's a big difference between 'didn't happen' and 'no evidence' for heaven's sake.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

There's a big difference between 'didn't happen' and 'no evidence' for heaven's sake.

So do you in all honesty believe this was the entry point for the abductor? As far as I am aware not even the McCanns think this and certainly not Clarence Mitchell. Aside from the complete absence of evidence it leaves you with the implausible idea that the shutters were closed again during Gerry’s check and Matt’s second check!!

[Eleanor]

So do you in all honesty believe this was the entry point for the abductor? As far as I am aware not even the McCanns think this and certainly not Clarence Mitchell. Aside from the complete absence of evidence it leaves you with the implausible idea that the shutters were closed again during Gerry’s check and Matt’s second check!!

I do not know.  And nor do you.  But then that is my point.

[Vertigo Swirl]

So do you in all honesty believe this was the entry point for the abductor? As far as I am aware not even the McCanns think this and certainly not Clarence Mitchell. Aside from the complete absence of evidence it leaves you with the implausible idea that the shutters were closed again during Gerry’s check and Matt’s second check!!

That’s your idea, no one has ever suggested that is what happened.

[Eleanor]

That’s your idea, no one has ever suggested that is what happened.

We are now into Rebuttal, Again.  Constant accusations from Sceptics when in fact no one knows and never has done.  Just Opinions stated as Fact.

I can't even be bothered to explain my thoughts anymore.  I don't care of what anyone thinks.  A child is still missing and The McCanns have still not even been arrested.

My one and only serious thought is, "Thank God that didn't happen to me, or any of my children."

[G-Unit]

That’s your idea, no one has ever suggested that is what happened.

Patricia Cameron 4th May;

“They think someone must have come in the window and gone out the door with her.”
https://themaddiecasefiles.com/where-s-our-maddie-the-sun-04-05-07-t2908.html

[G-Unit]

That’s your idea, no one has ever suggested that is what happened.

For a long while we would assume that the abductor had entered and exited through the window of the children’s bedroom (madeleine)

[Vertigo Swirl]

Patricia Cameron 4th May;

“They think someone must have come in the window and gone out the door with her.”
https://themaddiecasefiles.com/where-s-our-maddie-the-sun-04-05-07-t2908.html

Where did she mention all that stuff about the abductor spending 50 minutes in the apartment and closing the shutters after opening them?