Author Topic: The timeline revisited  (Read 161341 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2595 on: December 21, 2021, 10:02:45 AM »
Once again you are accusing Martin Grime of lying. I find that quite distasteful; not to mention libellous.



FALSE ALERTS

'False' positives are always a possibility; to date Eddie has not so indicated
operationally or in training.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES.htm
Can you please explain why you are so willing to suspend your ABC of crime-solving when it comes to the owner of the dogs making such claims about their reliability?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2596 on: December 21, 2021, 10:05:08 AM »
Try reading it again.. I haven't..

As for your quote you need to post the whole paragragh. You are absolutely wrong.  Eddie has alerted many times.. It cannot be proven if all those alerts are,  correct..or false. It's basic common sense that some seem to lack..

Yeah yeah yeah. Same old same old. Slurs being cast by 'armchair experts' who have no idea what they're talking about imo.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2597 on: December 21, 2021, 10:06:39 AM »
Can you please explain why you are so willing to suspend your ABC of crime-solving when it comes to the owner of the dogs making such claims about their reliability?

Gunit needs to read the sentence following the one she's, quoted where grime clarifies he's talking about road kill.. She's made a massive error

Offline G-Unit

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2598 on: December 21, 2021, 10:09:22 AM »
Can you please explain why you are so willing to suspend your ABC of crime-solving when it comes to the owner of the dogs making such claims about their reliability?

I'm well aware that not all policemen are honourable people. I have seen absolutely nothing to suggest that Martin Grime wasn't professional, experienced and honest.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2599 on: December 21, 2021, 10:20:22 AM »
I'm well aware that not all policemen are honourable people. I have seen absolutely nothing to suggest that Martin Grime wasn't professional, experienced and honest.
So because you're not aware of any stains on his character or professionalism (and this from a position of almost total ignorance of the man on a personal and professional basis) you are able to dispense quite happily of the ABC mantra which you are so strict to apply to others. How does that make any sense? 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2600 on: December 21, 2021, 10:51:01 AM »

This is just a game of words now.  Some of us are better at it than others.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2601 on: December 21, 2021, 10:57:26 AM »
Gunit needs to read the sentence following the one she's, quoted where grime clarifies he's talking about road kill.. She's made a massive error

You need to read on...

"My experience as a trainer is that false alerts are normally caused by handler
cueing. All indications by the dog are preceded by a change in bahaviour.
This increased handler confidence in the response. This procedure also stops
handlers 'cueing' and indication. The dogs are allowed to 'free search' and
investigate areas of interest. The handler does not influence their behaviour
other than to direct the search."
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES.htm
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Brietta

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2602 on: December 21, 2021, 11:18:04 AM »
You need to read on...

"My experience as a trainer is that false alerts are normally caused by handler
cueing. All indications by the dog are preceded by a change in bahaviour.
This increased handler confidence in the response. This procedure also stops
handlers 'cueing' and indication. The dogs are allowed to 'free search' and
investigate areas of interest. The handler does not influence their behaviour
other than to direct the search."
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES.htm

Are you the only poster on the McCann boards who has not watched the videos of of the cadaver dog in action.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2603 on: December 21, 2021, 12:16:11 PM »
I'm well aware that not all policemen are honourable people. I have seen absolutely nothing to suggest that Martin Grime wasn't professional, experienced and honest.
BTW, I've seen something to suggest that he was not averse to claiming astoundingly large expenses for himself and his services.  Jersey was it not?  And what did the Jersey police get for the almost £100k they had to shell out for a few days work?  And would they have been quite so willing to pay such princely sums had Grime not made a name for himself and his dogs by exploiting his involvement in high profile cases such as the McCann case and by making such unproveable claims about his dogs' abilities?  You may call that professional, experienced and honest, well inasmuch as blowing his own trumpet and making unsubstantiated claims about his worth in the field, then yes I'm sure he was very expert indeed. 
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1217863/Bungled-Jersey-child-abuse-probe-branded-20million-shambles.html
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2604 on: December 21, 2021, 12:16:58 PM »
Are you the only poster on the McCann boards who has not watched the videos of of the cadaver dog in action.

I have watched the videos and, just like other posters, I'm not qualified to reach conclusions about them.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline G-Unit

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2605 on: December 21, 2021, 12:42:44 PM »
BTW, I've seen something to suggest that he was not averse to claiming astoundingly large expenses for himself and his services.  Jersey was it not?  And what did the Jersey police get for the almost £100k they had to shell out for a few days work?  And would they have been quite so willing to pay such princely sums had Grime not made a name for himself and his dogs by exploiting his involvement in high profile cases such as the McCann case and by making such unproveable claims about his dogs' abilities?  You may call that professional, experienced and honest, well inasmuch as blowing his own trumpet and making unsubstantiated claims about his worth in the field, then yes I'm sure he was very expert indeed. 
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1217863/Bungled-Jersey-child-abuse-probe-branded-20million-shambles.html

I think you'll find (if you read the story you provided the link to) that Grime was there for a lot longer than 'a few days', and his fees were not excessive compared to those charged by UK police forces.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2606 on: December 21, 2021, 01:12:33 PM »
I have watched the videos and, just like other posters, I'm not qualified to reach conclusions about them.

You dint need any qualifications to see grime calling eddie back.. Nor to see the posters in the Renault... Nor to see Eddie did not alert to CC... Etc etc

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2607 on: December 21, 2021, 01:22:30 PM »
I think you'll find (if you read the story you provided the link to) that Grime was there for a lot longer than 'a few days', and his fees were not excessive compared to those charged by UK police forces.
Nice work if you can get it, and unlicensed too!  what possible justification can there be for charging that amount of money and spending that amount of time to find a piece of coconut and a sex tissue with a barky dog?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2608 on: December 21, 2021, 01:30:22 PM »

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1217863/Bungled-Jersey-child-abuse-probe-branded-20million-shambles.html

It appears that Martin Grime spent much of his time on Jersey working for Harper at £650 a day when his dogs were not required at all.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2609 on: December 21, 2021, 02:02:47 PM »
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1217863/Bungled-Jersey-child-abuse-probe-branded-20million-shambles.html

It appears that Martin Grime spent much of his time on Jersey working for Harper at £650 a day when his dogs were not required at all.
What was he actually doing for a 3rd of a year then? 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".