The timeline revisited

[Icanhandlethetruth]

The fact is Grime called the dogs back to things McCann... That's factual not opinion.. You don't seem to understand the difference.  I'm reporting facts and you and gunit are suggesting the facts make him corrupt.
I think it's a high on certainty that Wolters has the evidence... Glad you agree thst would suggest all the alerts are false.

The fact is that Grime can call the dogs back if he feels the area wasn’t searched adequately,
As you seem to be unaware, a cadaver dog search is not like a dog at the airport searching packages on a conveyor belt.

Let me ask you, why do you think it is high on certain that Wolter has the evidence?
What leads you to this conclusion, he has been very vague with what he actually has up till now

[Mr Gray]

The fact is that Grime can call the dogs back if he feels the area wasn’t searched adequately,
As you seem to be unaware, a cadaver dog search is not like a dog at the airport searching packages on a conveyor belt.

Let me ask you, why do you think it is high on certain that Wolter has the evidence?
What leads you to this conclusion, he has been very vague with what he actually has up till now

Grime can do what he liked it's meaningless..

You may not have listened to Wolters as much or as closely as, I have.  He's been quite precise... Half a dozen pointers that the evidence is photographic

[Icanhandlethetruth]

Grime can do what he liked it's meaningless..

You may not have listened to Wolters as much or as closely as, I have.  He's been quite precise... Half a dozen pointers that the evidence is photographic

Well go on tell me what he has said that makes you so convinced he has the evidence.
Hasn't he said its not a photo?

It is circumstantial evidence – we have no scientific evidence,' Wolters said.

'If we had a video of the act or a picture of Madeleine dead with Brueckner on camera, we wouldn't have had to make a public appeal. But we only have circumstantial evidence.' 

[Mr Gray]

Well go on tell me what he has said that makes you so convinced he has the evidence.
Hasn't he said its not a photo?

No he hasn't... Why should I bother... Your mind is closed. 
Sceptics think CB can't be guilty because the dogs never lie

[Icanhandlethetruth]

No he hasn't... Why should I bother... Your mind is closed. 
Sceptics think CB can't be guilty because the dogs never lie

I don't think CB can't be guilty. You sure like to pigeon hole people don't you.
Why is my mind closed?
if I may say your mind seems to be closed to the option that Wolters doesn't have very much.

[Icanhandlethetruth]

No he hasn't... Why should I bother... Your mind is closed. 
Sceptics think CB can't be guilty because the dogs never lie

He says quite clearly he only has circumstantial evidence. This is from October 2021

[Icanhandlethetruth]

Grime can do what he liked it's meaningless..

You may not have listened to Wolters as much or as closely as, I have.  He's been quite precise... Half a dozen pointers that the evidence is photographic

So what are the half dozen pointers that you mention?

[faithlilly]

thank heavens our resident dog handler expert has given us her opinion

Your welcome.

Anything else you need to know don’t be afraid to ask.

[Brietta]

He says quite clearly he only has circumstantial evidence. This is from October 2021

In October 2021 he said there is sufficient evidence available to make laying charges possible. 


Speaking to the Mirror, Mr Wolters said: ‘It is now possible that we could charge. We have that evidence now.

‘But it’s not just about charging him – we want to charge him with the best body of evidence possible.

‘When we still have questions, it would be nonsense to charge rather than wait for the answers that could strengthen our position.’
https://metro.co.uk/2021/10/09/madeleine-mccann-investigators-100-sure-prime-suspect-killed-her-15392191/?ico=related-posts

[Mr Gray]

Your welcome.

Anything else you need to know don’t be afraid to ask.

Question... Shouldn't it be you're not your

[Brietta]

So what are the half dozen pointers that you mention?

Haven't you been keeping up with the information which is in the public domain - shouldn't be too difficult - there hasn't been too much of it.

[Mr Gray]

Well go on tell me what he has said that makes you so convinced he has the evidence.
Hasn't he said its not a photo?

It is circumstantial evidence – we have no scientific evidence,' Wolters said.

'If we had a video of the act or a picture of Madeleine dead with Brueckner on camera, we wouldn't have had to make a public appeal. But we only have circumstantial evidence.' 

You fell into my trap Re the photo.. I'll answer shortly.
Th e devil is in the detail... You just don't pick up on the important details whereby this remark strengthens my thoughts on the fact the evidence is photograohic

[Vertigo Swirl]

I don't think CB can't be guilty. You sure like to pigeon hole people don't you.
Why is my mind closed?
if I may say your mind seems to be closed to the option that Wolters doesn't have very much.

Neither Operation Grange nor the BKA has once referred to the dog alerts.  They are completely irrelevant as far as the current investigation into Madeleine’s disappearance is concerned.  Do you agree with this?

[faithlilly]

Question... Shouldn't it be you're not your

It certainly should be…well spotted.

Now if you could apply the same diligence to your own spelling I’m sure your posts would be so much easier to understand.

[Mr Gray]

Well go on tell me what he has said that makes you so convinced he has the evidence.
Hasn't he said its not a photo?

It is circumstantial evidence – we have no scientific evidence,' Wolters said.

'If we had a video of the act or a picture of Madeleine dead with Brueckner on camera, we wouldn't have had to make a public appeal. But we only have circumstantial evidence.' 

I've said the concrete evidence could well be photographis at least six moths ago if not more. Wolters has made a least half a dizen pointers it is photographic

I've said the photo shows the abuse of MM but not her death and CB is not in the photo...that would be proof if his involvement.
Woltere has confirmed he does not have a photo with Mm and CB in.
The fact he mentions photographic evidence is unusual and confirms my thoughts that his evidence is photographic.
He has also appealed fir descriptions if the interiors of any places CB lived or hhas access to.. Could well be trying to identify the location of the video/photo