Author Topic: Can we judge a person's character by their stance on the case?  (Read 56250 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Can we judge a person's character by their stance on the case?
« Reply #165 on: August 04, 2019, 04:36:58 PM »
if you search for...supporters and dribble in faiths posts...thats the second one that comes up...that was my thought and shows whos the best armchair detective

Gold star...go to the top of the class.

( is this really a grown man ? )
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Can we judge a person's character by their stance on the case?
« Reply #166 on: August 04, 2019, 04:37:33 PM »
No, that’s true...I don’t understand how intelligent, educated people believe the parent’s narrative....and that’s why I don’t.

BTW I think in your post you have encapsulated exactly why G asked her question.

what is not to believe in the parent account...G should have asked the question of me...i would be quite happy to answer

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Can we judge a person's character by their stance on the case?
« Reply #167 on: August 04, 2019, 04:39:21 PM »
I think that the phrase is 'hoisted by your on petard'.

Reincarnation is a double edged sword.

If you don't like smileys on this forum, PM John requesting they be removed.

 &^^&*
In what way do you perceive I have been "hoisted by my own petard"?   &%%6
I think that's a pretty stupid observation on your part.   *%87
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Can we judge a person's character by their stance on the case?
« Reply #168 on: August 04, 2019, 04:39:46 PM »
Gold star...go to the top of the class.

( is this really a grown man ? )

I dont have to go anywhere ..thats where I came from..I was absolutely correct re how VS found your post

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Can we judge a person's character by their stance on the case?
« Reply #169 on: August 04, 2019, 04:40:12 PM »
Gold star...go to the top of the class.

( is this really a grown man ? )
And it didn't take long for Faithlilly's insults to start up again did it?  Is this your "better half" talking now?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Can we judge a person's character by their stance on the case?
« Reply #170 on: August 04, 2019, 04:42:26 PM »
In what way is that ageist ?
It's not, it's just offensive, it's bracketing all supporters together as slobbering idiots.  Now doubt it was light-hearted banter, (ho! ho!) but it comes across as something much nastier.  IMO.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Can we judge a person's character by their stance on the case?
« Reply #171 on: August 04, 2019, 04:43:43 PM »
That's when you know it exists and have some idea of its content.  Which Verti clearly did not.
What are you on about?  How do you think I found the posts?  Consulted my ten volume ring-bound notebooks of nasty things Faithlilly has written through the years? 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Can we judge a person's character by their stance on the case?
« Reply #172 on: August 04, 2019, 04:44:02 PM »
i think you miss the point...type in supporters and perhaps another word...search in faiths posts and see what comes up

 *%87

I haven't missed the point.

As you have now clocked up 33,333 posts, it would appear you have more time to spend on such trivia than I do.

Perhaps Vert with his burgeoning post count is cast from the same mould?
What's up, old man?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Can we judge a person's character by their stance on the case?
« Reply #173 on: August 04, 2019, 04:47:31 PM »
I haven't missed the point.

As you have now clocked up 33,333 posts, it would appear you have more time to spend on such trivia than I do.

Perhaps Vert with his burgeoning post count is cast from the same mould?
Let's never forget you believe Davel and I are actually the same poster!  @)(++(*
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Can we judge a person's character by their stance on the case?
« Reply #174 on: August 04, 2019, 04:50:09 PM »
I haven't missed the point.

As you have now clocked up 33,333 posts, it would appear you have more time to spend on such trivia than I do.

Perhaps Vert with his burgeoning post count is cast from the same mould?

I may well spend less time...but post much quicker.....im not retired as you are...and I dont waste time staying up all night watching tv programmes

Offline faithlilly

Re: Can we judge a person's character by their stance on the case?
« Reply #175 on: August 04, 2019, 04:53:01 PM »
It's not, it's just offensive, it's bracketing all supporters together as slobbering idiots.  Now doubt it was light-hearted banter, (ho! ho!) but it comes across as something much nastier.  IMO.

But I thought the point was that it was ageist ?

You really don’t want to be nice, do you ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Can we judge a person's character by their stance on the case?
« Reply #176 on: August 04, 2019, 04:55:56 PM »
But I thought the point was that it was ageist ?

You really don’t want to be nice, do you ?
I didn't say it was ageist, just another example of your obsession with dribbling supporters I am perfectly nice thanks, I don''t think I've ever accused you of being old, wearing stained clothes or dribbling.  What have I written on this thread that isn't nice apart from the stuff I've quoted that you wrote and which is plain nasty?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Can we judge a person's character by their stance on the case?
« Reply #177 on: August 04, 2019, 05:17:35 PM »
I didn't say it was ageist, just another example of your obsession with dribbling supporters I am perfectly nice thanks, I don''t think I've ever accused you of being old, wearing stained clothes or dribbling.  What have I written on this thread that isn't nice apart from the stuff I've quoted that you wrote and which is plain nasty?

Obsession ? One post ? Cardigan ? One post...and aimed at you.

I did make the comment that older people tend to view professionals like doctors, consultants etc in a higher regard than they possibly deserve and while this is a generalisation, in the main I think it remains true. It certainly wasn’t offensive.

If my posts are playing on your mind months, and even years, after I posted them perhaps you need to stop reading my posts ? My opinion, I’m sure, doesn’t matter a jot to you so why are you so vexed ?

Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Can we judge a person's character by their stance on the case?
« Reply #178 on: August 04, 2019, 05:36:00 PM »
Obsession ? One post ? Cardigan ? One post...and aimed at you.

I did make the comment that older people tend to view professionals like doctors, consultants etc in a higher regard than they possibly deserve and while this is a generalisation, in the main I think it remains true. It certainly wasn’t offensive.

If my posts are playing on your mind months, and even years, after I posted them perhaps you need to stop reading my posts ? My opinion, I’m sure, doesn’t matter a jot to you so why are you so vexed ?

never mind doctors ...consultants... I think some posters are holding dog trainers in higher regard than they deserve...

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Can we judge a person's character by their stance on the case?
« Reply #179 on: August 04, 2019, 05:38:55 PM »
Obsession ? One post ? Cardigan ? One post...and aimed at you.

I did make the comment that older people tend to view professionals like doctors, consultants etc in a higher regard than they possibly deserve and while this is a generalisation, in the main I think it remains true. It certainly wasn’t offensive.

If my posts are playing on your mind months, and even years, after I posted them perhaps you need to stop reading my posts ? My opinion, I’m sure, doesn’t matter a jot to you so why are you so vexed ?

Faith....why dont you put your hand up and admit that some of your posts are just plain nasty and intentionally offensive. Ill give you credit and say sometimes you word them quite well to disguise your intent. Admit it...get it off your chest it will make you feel better...and we can all move on.