Author Topic: Mark Redwine v 16 cadaver dogs  (Read 138720 times)

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline jassi

Re: Mark Redwine v 16 cadaver dogs
« Reply #1170 on: September 27, 2022, 05:37:03 PM »
Onwards and Downwards.  It is all there to see with Amaral releasing the actual name of Brueckner.  And then The Dreadlocks and The Cartoons on Brueckner's van.  But somedybody caught him out with that video of Brueckner driving down through Spain on his way to The Algarve.

Why is Portugal doing nothing about this gross interference in the course of Justice?

Probably because he isn't interfering with the course of justice.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Brietta

Re: Mark Redwine v 16 cadaver dogs
« Reply #1171 on: September 27, 2022, 06:03:17 PM »
Onwards and Downwards.  It is all there to see with Amaral releasing the actual name of Brueckner.  And then The Dreadlocks and The Cartoons on Brueckner's van.  But somedybody caught him out with that video of Brueckner driving down through Spain on his way to The Algarve.

Why is Portugal doing nothing about this gross interference in the course of Justice?

Had it not been for the video documenting the radio competition trip the dreadlocks and the cartoon painted vehicle would have entered the lexicon as yet another "known fact".
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Eleanor

Re: Mark Redwine v 16 cadaver dogs
« Reply #1172 on: September 27, 2022, 06:06:38 PM »
Probably because he isn't interfering with the course of justice.

Just making it up then for a bit of fun.

Offline jassi

Re: Mark Redwine v 16 cadaver dogs
« Reply #1173 on: September 27, 2022, 06:11:05 PM »
Just making it up then for a bit of fun.
Who knows, but as it was just said in a casual interview     it has no legal standing

I.E. he didn't make a sworn statement to the investigating police force.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Brietta

Re: Mark Redwine v 16 cadaver dogs
« Reply #1174 on: September 27, 2022, 06:22:51 PM »
Probably because he isn't interfering with the course of justice.

There is a lot going on at the moment about which we know nothing.  Just as there was a lot going on in Madeleine's case between the tenth and fifteenth anniversary of her abduction.

We knew nothing about that until the BKA passed information to the PJ; which was leaked to Amaral; who promptly gave it to Saunokonoko's podcast in 2019.

Whether those instrumental in operating the judicial processes in Britain - Germany, were annoyed by that indiscretion remains to be seen.  The clincher might be if somewhere in the Portuguese jurisdiction feathers were ruffled and we shall have to wait agog and see.

Until then, were I you I would re-adopt my passive aggressive stance and leave the assertions to those who have a clue as to what they make reference - and nobody really has a clue what Portuguese honour will allow or dictate.  I rather suspect, least of all the Portuguese.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Eleanor

Re: Mark Redwine v 16 cadaver dogs
« Reply #1175 on: September 27, 2022, 06:55:48 PM »
Who knows, but as it was just said in a casual interview     it has no legal standing

I.E. he didn't make a sworn statement to the investigating police force.

Oh right.  Amaral lied then.  What's new?

Offline Eleanor

Re: Mark Redwine v 16 cadaver dogs
« Reply #1176 on: September 27, 2022, 07:11:35 PM »
There is a lot going on at the moment about which we know nothing.  Just as there was a lot going on in Madeleine's case between the tenth and fifteenth anniversary of her abduction.

We knew nothing about that until the BKA passed information to the PJ; which was leaked to Amaral; who promptly gave it to Saunokonoko's podcast in 2019.

Whether those instrumental in operating the judicial processes in Britain - Germany, were annoyed by that indiscretion remains to be seen.  The clincher might be if somewhere in the Portuguese jurisdiction feathers were ruffled and we shall have to wait agog and see.

Until then, were I you I would re-adopt my passive aggressive stance and leave the assertions to those who have a clue as to what they make reference - and nobody really has a clue what Portuguese honour will allow or dictate.  I rather suspect, least of all the Portuguese.

I have to admit to some difficulty with this, but there is nothing to be done at the moment.

For a short while Portugal did seem to be trying to make some sense after the sacking of Amaral, but then it all went quiet.  And now we don't know anymore.

Amaral continues to accuse and no one does anything about it.  For why is this?

The McCanns will never be indicted and Portugal will never again be a safe place to go.

Offline John

Re: Mark Redwine v 16 cadaver dogs
« Reply #1177 on: September 27, 2022, 08:21:10 PM »
I have to admit to some difficulty with this, but there is nothing to be done at the moment.

For a short while Portugal did seem to be trying to make some sense after the sacking of Amaral, but then it all went quiet.  And now we don't know anymore.

Amaral continues to accuse and no one does anything about it.  For why is this?

The McCanns will never be indicted and Portugal will never again be a safe place to go.

Never say never Eleanor.  I think Portugal is just as safe as most European countries and probably safer than some including Britain.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Mark Redwine v 16 cadaver dogs
« Reply #1178 on: September 27, 2022, 08:35:49 PM »
Never say never Eleanor.  I think Portugal is just as safe as most European countries and probably safer than some including Britain.

i dont think portugal is safe if you are a victim of a crime

Offline Eleanor

Re: Mark Redwine v 16 cadaver dogs
« Reply #1179 on: September 27, 2022, 08:39:13 PM »
Never say never Eleanor.  I think Portugal is just as safe as most European countries and probably safer than some including Britain.

While a Paedophile and Rapist went unchecked in Portugal.

And of course, I don't live in Britain and haven't done so for thirty years.  Is there any reason to wonder for why?

Offline Eleanor

Re: Mark Redwine v 16 cadaver dogs
« Reply #1180 on: September 27, 2022, 08:42:32 PM »
i dont think portugal is safe if you are a victim of a crime

Obviously not.  But I don't suppose I need to explain.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Mark Redwine v 16 cadaver dogs
« Reply #1181 on: September 27, 2022, 08:54:04 PM »
Obviously not.  But I don't suppose I need to explain.

Nor safe if you are a suspect in a crime

Offline G-Unit

Re: Mark Redwine v 16 cadaver dogs
« Reply #1182 on: September 27, 2022, 09:11:26 PM »
Never say never Eleanor.  I think Portugal is just as safe as most European countries and probably safer than some including Britain.

Well around 30,000 British people live there; mostly in the Algarve.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

Re: Mark Redwine v 16 cadaver dogs
« Reply #1183 on: September 27, 2022, 09:24:11 PM »
Nor safe if you are a suspect in a crime

Actually much worse than that.  I won't bore you all with the details yet again, but Kate McCann was very lucky that she wasn't confronted by Police Station Stairs.  But then Britain had seen this all before and failed miserably in the past to protect British Citizens.  And they were not going to allow this to happen again.

Whether or not Kate McCann was guilty  remains irrelevant.  She has never been found to be so.

As for Portuguese suspects, this is not the business of Britain, but rest assured that it does not go unnoticed.

Portugal is still a Fascist State and still governed by like people.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Mark Redwine v 16 cadaver dogs
« Reply #1184 on: September 27, 2022, 09:43:36 PM »
Well around 30,000 British people live there; mostly in the Algarve.
52 of whom were registered paedophiles in 2012.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".