Has The MET Also Known As Scotland Yard Met Expectation?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Loose women tell us they doubt MET have any hot leads to pursue.

What do they know about it?

[Mr Gray]

What do they know about it?

I think holly has shot her credibility by giving so much importance to the importance of Loose Women... So has sil... I see them on a par with Jeremy Kyle

[Vertigo Swirl]

I think holly has shot her credibility by giving so much importance to the importance of Loose Women

Loose Women, jeez, the TV equivalent of gossiping over the garden fence.

[ShiningInLuz]

I think holly has shot her credibility by giving so much importance to the importance of Loose Women... So has sil... I see them on a par with Jeremy Kyle

If you think Loose Women is unimportant then you should not have made such a biggie about it.

For the nth time, Loose Women tells us what is public perception in the UK about the case.  Nowt to do with which bodies decide to spend the public purse.

Got it?

[G-Unit]

The fact that the Home Office continues to fund OG does not mean they have an opinion on whether it should continue or not. The people making that decision are The Met and no-one else;

When considering special grants applications, the Home Office does not take a view on whether an investigation should continue, which would be an operational matter for the police.
https://homeofficemedia.blog.gov.uk/2019/06/05/home-office-update-on-funding-for-operation-grange/

[G-Unit]

If you think Loose Women is unimportant then you should not have made such a biggie about it.

For the nth time, Loose Women tells us what is public perception in the UK about the case.  Nowt to do with which bodies decide to spend the public purse.

Got it?

I see Loose Women as more similar to The Wright Stuff than to Jeremy Kyle. They don't exploit people.

[Mr Gray]

If you think Loose Women is unimportant then you should not have made such a biggie about it.

For the nth time, Loose Women tells us what is public perception in the UK about the case.  Nowt to do with which bodies decide to spend the public purse.

Got it?

Ive had it for along time....I dont think i can be bothered to debate an issue with someone like you and holly who care about what  a programmme such as loose women think

[Mr Gray]

I see Loose Women as more similar to The Wright Stuff than to Jeremy Kyle. They don't exploit people.

I once appeared on the Wright stuff and remember putting Kate Silverton in her place

[ShiningInLuz]

Ive had it for along time....I dont think i can be bothered to debate an issue with someone like you and holly who care about what  a programmme such as loose women think

Thank you.

Bliss!

[Holly Goodhead]

Pray tell what is wrong with the following debate on Loose Women re the ongoing MET investigation/resources:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5CyS-7GnPg

[Mr Gray]

Pray tell what is wrong with the following debate on Loose Women re the ongoing MET investigation/resources:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5CyS-7GnPg

I will watch it shortly and tell you..
I couldn't understand how you could claim to have solved the case... Now I do.. Your solution to the case has as much credibility as your claim that loose women know as much about the case as posters here... Imo... That's zero credibility

[Holly Goodhead]

I will watch it shortly and tell you..
I couldn't understand how you could claim to have solved the case... Now I do.. Your solution to the case has as much credibility as your claim that loose women know as much about the case as posters here... Imo... That's zero credibility

How can you possibly know what Loose Women know about the case?  The fact I am happy to listen to range a views shows I'm open minded which has helped me solve the case   

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_j_cE7LP3GY

[Robittybob1]

I already understand that... And of course I'm not bothered what you think.
The presumption of innocence is not proof of innocence it is more equivalent to being considered not guilty... Which again is not proof of innocence..

So if a suspect is found not guilty of a crime it would be libellous to suggest he had committed the crime even though his innocence has not been proven

It started from the expression the burden of proof is on the accuser to prove guilt not on the denier to prove their innocence.  So you will always have an accusation and a denial, but it is the accuser who has to prove the case.

A person can be accused but that does not mean guilt until there is proof.

[Mr Gray]

How can you possibly know what Loose Women know about the case?  The fact I am happy to listen to range a views shows I'm open minded which has helped me solve the case   

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_j_cE7LP3GY

You think you are open minded... I would say you are easily convinced and are not critical enough of what you accept as fact

[Mr Gray]

It started from the expression the burden of proof is on the accuser to prove guilt not on the denier to prove their innocence.  So you will always have an accusation and a denial, but it is the accuser who has to prove the case.

A person can be accused but that does not mean guilt until there is proof.

Outside of a court the police are not allowed to express their opinion of guilt... That would be a denial of the presumption of innocence