Is it any wonder that initial investigators arrived at the conclusions they did?

[G-Unit]

Is there any further information re the British tracker dogs actually deployed early on?  A date and the route they took would be most interesting.

And is there any further information on the 2 NPIA SuperTracker dogs not deployed?  That's another angle that would be most interesting?

Why would the Brits send out UK ordinary trackers if they had UK SuperTrackers to hand?  How curious!

The Sun is better at spreading confusion than it is at spreading information.

[Brietta]

You quoted a story from the Sun which seemed to be describing tracker dogs. The Portuguese had good tracker dogs of their own.

You quoted from exactly the same source which identified the dogs which were on standby in May but only allowed to make an appearance three months after the event.  Didn't you notice ... or have you extraordinarily never heard of them, particularly since you used a source dedicated to their exploits

Snip
"The dogs were put on standby to go to the Algarve within days of Madeleine’s disappearance.
 
"You would expect the Portuguese to make use of the best resources available to them, but they repeatedly ignore the offers of assistance."
 
The dogs include a spaniel whose sense of smell is so keen she can sniff traces of blood on a weapon even after it has been scrubbed clean.
 
But the source warned: "They work most effectively within a 28-day time frame. After that the scent becomes much weaker."
https://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id157.htm


Why do you think the offer of these "specialist" dogs was refused ... but ordinary run of the mill British trackers of which you opine "The Portuguese had good tracker dogs of their own." seem to have had the run of the place.
Did they ??

Why do you suppose the initial Portuguese investigators didn't wasn't to use the alleged two best tools in the box to find Madeleine?

[Brietta]

Is there any further information re the British tracker dogs actually deployed early on?  A date and the route they took would be most interesting.

And is there any further information on the 2 NPIA SuperTracker dogs not deployed?  That's another angle that would be most interesting?

Why would the Brits send out UK ordinary trackers if they had UK SuperTrackers to hand?  How curious!

                    Curioser and curiouser.


The point I made in my original post using a primary source was that the initial Portuguese investigators refused practical assistance from their British counterparts.
A senior officer of which ... Amaral says in his book he was so suspicious of that he had him followed: with that level of paranoia in evidence is it any wonder the initial investigators took the path they did which led them to entirely the wrong conclusions as they did.

[Wonderfulspam]

                    Curioser and curiouser.


The point I made in my original post using a primary source was that the initial Portuguese investigators refused practical assistance from their British counterparts.
A senior officer of which Amaral says in his book he was so suspicious of that he had him followed: with that level of paranoia in evidence is it any wonder the initial investigators took the path they did which led them to entirely the wrong conclusions as they did.

IYO

[barrier]

IYO

Yep,nothing to suggest "The remit of Operation Grange is to investigate ...  "(as if the abduction occurred in the UK)" is the right conclusion.

[Brietta]

IYO

NO
Not on my opinion.
In the opinion of the Policia Judiciaria and the Portuguese Prosecutors:  you want to quibble take it up with them, but that is the fact of the matter.

[Wonderfulspam]

NO
Not on my opinion.
In the opinion of the Policia Judiciaria and the Portuguese Prosecutors:  you want to quibble take it up with them, but that is the fact of the matter.

No, it is your opinion.

It hasn't been proven that the McCanns didn't do it.

[Wonderfulspam]

Yep,nothing to suggest "The remit of Operation Grange is to investigate ...  "(as if the abduction occurred in the UK)" is the right conclusion.

Precisely.

I'm yet to see any proof that Maddie was abducted.

Brietta has a habit of posting as if there is.

[Brietta]

Yep,nothing to suggest "The remit of Operation Grange is to investigate ...  "(as if the abduction occurred in the UK)" is the right conclusion.

You may not wish to acknowledge the official Portuguese decisions regarding the mistakes made by the initial investigators; that is entirely up to you but facts are chiels that winna ding and all the facts of the matter are contained in the PJ's FINAL REPORT and the ARCHIVING DISPATCH of 21.07.08.

[Brietta]

Precisely.

I'm yet to see any proof that Maddie was abducted.

Brietta has a habit of posting as if there is.

                              Cite please 

[Wonderfulspam]

                              Cite please 

Are you serious?

Your every post in this forum oozes with support for the McCanns.

[Mr Gray]

Are you serious?

Your every post in this forum oozes with support for the McCanns.

I support the McCann's claim to innocence.  There's no proof they arent

[Wonderfulspam]

I support the McCann's claim to innocence.  There's no proof they arent

Just as there's no proof Maddie was abducted.

It's quite possible the parents dunnit theory is correct (despite umpteen years & 12 million spent etc)

[Angelo222]

I support the McCann's claim to innocence.  There's no proof they arent

Innocent of what exactly because I can think of a few things for which they are certainly culpable.  Leaving their children unattended and unsupervised being one of them.

[Mr Gray]

Innocent of what exactly because I can think of a few things for which they are certainly culpable.  Leaving their children unattended and unsupervised being one of them.

Yes guilty of that.... But innocent of what amaral and his team accused them of