Author Topic: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?  (Read 267784 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1035 on: June 22, 2020, 09:10:51 PM »
Let me make it clear for all. There was a bath down there, and we had allegations concerning it, including rape and forced abortion. The dogs reacted in the area of the bath and inside it. Bedfordshire Police forensic experts tested it for blood and the tests were positive.

Lenny Harper
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Brietta

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1036 on: June 22, 2020, 09:13:22 PM »
Just a reminder ~ ZAMPO and Thomas Quick the mass murderer who wasn't.  Read all about it on a forum near to you.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline faithlilly

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1037 on: June 22, 2020, 10:13:05 PM »
There is evidence on record that Grime encouraged alerts

Link please ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Billy Whizz Fan Club

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1038 on: June 22, 2020, 11:43:57 PM »
Just a reminder ~ ZAMPO and Thomas Quick the mass murderer who wasn't.  Read all about it on a forum near to you.

And what's your explanation for Zampo's false alerts?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1039 on: June 23, 2020, 12:01:15 AM »
And what's your explanation for Zampo's false alerts?
There doesn’t necessarily need to be an explanation, all that there needs to be is an acknowledgement that “dogs don’t lie” is a load of bull.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Billy Whizz Fan Club

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1040 on: June 23, 2020, 12:14:32 AM »
There doesn’t necessarily need to be an explanation, all that there needs to be is an acknowledgement that “dogs don’t lie” is a load of bull.

I dare you to take some drugs past sniffer dogs at an airport  ?>)()<

Offline Billy Whizz Fan Club

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1041 on: June 23, 2020, 12:21:13 AM »
Here's some forensic science research.... and for me an explanation is needed. As G-Unit says; "question everything"!!

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17403590/

...."Results: The results of this study indicate that the well-trained cadaver dog is an outstanding tool for crime scene investigation displaying excellent sensitivity (75-100), specificity (91-100), and having a positive predictive value (90-100), negative predictive value (90-100) as well as accuracy (92-100). "....


Offline faithlilly

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1042 on: June 23, 2020, 12:28:37 AM »
Here's some forensic science research.... and for me an explanation is needed. As G-Unit says; "question everything"!!

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17403590/

...."Results: The results of this study indicate that the well-trained cadaver dog is an outstanding tool for crime scene investigation displaying excellent sensitivity (75-100), specificity (91-100), and having a positive predictive value (90-100), negative predictive value (90-100) as well as accuracy (92-100). "....

Such intelligent creature. They’re even being trained to detect Covid now.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1043 on: June 23, 2020, 01:04:06 AM »
Shussssh SY used dogs and have never questioned or criticised them. They've had to eliminate everything else because what is left is Smithman, the dogs, new DNA results and the rest of the circumstantial evidence case. Oh and Metodo 3 searched the wrong reservoir/lake! Tut tut  ?>)()<
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Brietta

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1044 on: June 23, 2020, 01:55:49 AM »
According to the conclusions of the SCCRC
  • the evidence given by the dog handler was unreliable
  • the evidence should not have been before the trial court
  • Gilroy would have been found guilty of murder without the dog evidence
Given that I think it may be a long time before dog alerts alone become admissible in Scottish Courts.  Gilroy was convicted on the basis of the evidence against him which I think was substantial.



The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission closed David Gilroy’s case for a miscarriage of justice part of the basis for which was as follows ...

One strand was fully and professionally examined by the SCCRC.
They concluded that the evidence given by the dog handler was unreliable.
They say that evidence should not have been before the trial court.
However, they also say that the absence of the dog evidence would not have changed the guilty verdict.
http://www.gilroyfamily.info/news.asp
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Billy Whizz Fan Club

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1045 on: June 23, 2020, 02:03:39 AM »
According to the conclusions of the SCCRC
  • the evidence given by the dog handler was unreliable
  • the evidence should not have been before the trial court
  • Gilroy would have been found guilty of murder without the dog evidence
Given that I think it may be a long time before dog alerts alone become admissible in Scottish Courts.  Gilroy was convicted on the basis of the evidence against him which I think was substantial.



The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission closed David Gilroy’s case for a miscarriage of justice part of the basis for which was as follows ...

One strand was fully and professionally examined by the SCCRC.
They concluded that the evidence given by the dog handler was unreliable.
They say that evidence should not have been before the trial court.
However, they also say that the absence of the dog evidence would not have changed the guilty verdict.
http://www.gilroyfamily.info/news.asp

What was this evidence given by the dog handler? How was it unreliable? Is this unreliability connected to Grime and Eddie? Can the same unreliability be transferred to the MM case? We need some context please.

Offline misty

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1046 on: June 23, 2020, 02:47:59 AM »
https://www.crimeonline.com/2019/06/27/deorr-kunz-jr-search-dogs-give-hard-alert-for-human-remains-near-spot-where-2-year-old-was-last-seen-4-years-ago-investigator-says/

followed by

https://www.kmvt.com/content/news/Bone-found-at-campground-not-related-to-DeOrr-Kunz-sheriff-says-568996501.html


2 different cadaver dogs, trained solely on human decomposition, alerted to a non-human bone. If both of these dogs got it wrong, how reliable is an alert to an intangible odour by a dog trained primarily on pig remains?

Offline Brietta

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1047 on: June 23, 2020, 03:38:43 AM »
What was this evidence given by the dog handler? How was it unreliable? Is this unreliability connected to Grime and Eddie? Can the same unreliability be transferred to the MM case? We need some context please.

My post is in relation to the murder of Suzanne Pilley and in my opinion is self explanatory in the context of the thread title.

For more information may I respectfully suggest you use the 'search' facility on the forum or make a start in your research at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Suzanne_Pilley
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1048 on: June 23, 2020, 07:19:39 AM »
I dare you to take some drugs past sniffer dogs at an airport  ?>)()<
OK, you explain the numerous false alerts by Zampo then.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Lace

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1049 on: June 23, 2020, 08:20:05 AM »
I dare you to take some drugs past sniffer dogs at an airport  ?>)()<

You can't compare a drug dog to a cadaver dog.   A drug dog can be trained on the scent of each drug.  There are hundreds of scents that come off a cadaver,  different scents to the different stages of decomposition.