The Telecinco Affair

[Lace]

Mistaken, rather than lying - IMO

No lying IMO

[The General]

So,  if someone says they can prove that Bigfoot exists,   is this person libelling anyone by saying this no.

If someone says I can prove Madeleine died in 5a,  is this person libelling anyone?  Yes,  as the McCann's say Madeleine was abducted.   Amaral is saying they are lying.

If someone says Aliens took Madeleine although sounding like a lunatic is this person libelling anyone,  no as the McCann's say Madeleine was abducted.

You can't compare someone saying Bigfoot exists with Madeleine died in 5a.

No he's not. He's saying that he thinks differently.
And I can. I just did. I can say what I like, within the bounds of legality and, in this instance, forum rules.
Davros can continually insist that everyone talks 'rubbish', or 'nonsense'. That's not nice, but he can say that if he likes in real life, if he had the minerals, but alas it's against forum rules. There's a distinction to be drawn.
Free speech must be defended.

[Mr Gray]

Not everyone has opinions posted as fact removed;

snip/
One book contained untruths and defamation which were challenged in court and the final result on that is yet to be delivered.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11196.msg571851#msg571851

  Kate said this in court...sounds like a challege to me...

She gives as an example the fact that the book accuses her and her husband of being
somehow involved and of faking an abduction. The book smears her and her husband throughout.

[Mr Gray]

Shut up. There's people who state they've discovered Bigfoot every day.
You can claim whatever the heck you like within the bounds of local libel laws if someone's willing to pay for it be produced. So what?

The local libel laws in portugal are governed by their commitment to the EU declaration of human rights

[The General]

The local libel laws in portugal are governed by their commitment to the EU declaration of human rights

Thank you. Not for reiterating the information that everyone already knows, but for managing to not start or finish the sentence with a 'rubbish' or 'nonsense'.

[Mr Gray]

Thank you. Not for reiterating the information that everyone already knows, but for managing to not start or finish the sentence with a 'rubbish' or 'nonsense'.

I dont use the word nonsense  but it seems unfair to blame me for the fact there is so much rubbish posted on this forum...next

[The General]

I dont use the word nonsense  but it seems unfair to blame me for the fact there is so much rubbish posted on this forum...next

Well you do post the lion's share, so I have you right.

[kizzy]

  Kate said this in court...sounds like a challege to me...

She gives as an example the fact that the book accuses her and her husband of being
somehow involved and of faking an abduction. The book smears her and her husband throughout.

If that is your logic D - it also smears others including SY.

Yet strangely enough none of them have took any actions to help the mcns IMO

[G-Unit]

  Kate said this in court...sounds like a challege to me...

She gives as an example the fact that the book accuses her and her husband of being
somehow involved and of faking an abduction. The book smears her and her husband throughout.

What has that to do with opinions posted as facts?

[Mr Gray]

What has that to do with opinions posted as facts?

its to do with the claims being challenged

[Mr Gray]

Well you do post the lion's share, so I have you right.

you have the right to post whatever rubbish you wish

[G-Unit]

its to do with the claims being challenged

Well it had nothing to do with my post.

[Mr Gray]

Well it had nothing to do with my post.

Yes it did  brietta posted..

One book contained untruths and defamation which were challenged in court and the final result on that is yet to be delivered.

and you seem to think this opinion when its fact

[Mr Gray]

If that is your logic D - it also smears others including SY.

Yet strangely enough none of them have took any actions to help the mcns IMO

who hasnt taken any action to help the Mccanns ..

SY have said they beleive maddie was abducted....The PJ said theyre not suspects and theres no evidence against them

[Wonderfulspam]

who hasnt taken any action to help the Mccanns ..

SY have said they beleive maddie was abducted....The PJ said theyre not suspects and theres no evidence against them

SY have said Maddie was abducted, not just that they believe such.

They are just a little reluctant to share their water tight abduction evidence with the public & the PJ, who have said they don't know what happened.

But SY are onto it, mark my words, Maddies abductor will be brought to justice any day now.....