« Reply #97 on: January 31, 2020, 06:25:29 PM »
I bet Julie's testimony influenced the jury too-------rightly or wrongly.
What I do wonder about is this: there were two people who could have committed the murders. If Jeremy did it, it was down to wickedness and greed. If Sheila did it, it was because she was very ill, and therefore, she cannot really be blamed. I think that in a crime as ghastly as this one, people would want to see somebody actually brought to justice. I wonder how much this affected how the police, the relatives and friends, the jury etc viewed Jeremy , whose behaviour after the murders certainly did him no favours, and who appeared to be a rather unpleasant young man (IMO, anyway). Just a thought.
This must have been a particularly unusual and appalling crime for EP to deal with, and I find it difficult to believe they messed it up. I would have thought they would have taken extra care, but who knows------.
Off out tonight---and NOT to celebrate Brexit!
I understand JM's testimony came with some sort of warning from the judge over its reliability. I guess at this moment in time we don't really know what impact it had with jurors. Jury's questions to the judge centered around the blood/silencer and only undermining this evidence in a very significant way can assist JB at this stage of the game.
I've just cracked open a bottle of strong Belgium beer but likewise not to celebrate Brexit

« Last Edit: January 31, 2020, 06:28:45 PM by Holly Goodhead »

Logged
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown. Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?