The phone call

[adam]

Do you know why they came to that conclusion?

Supporters & the trial defence cancel each other out.

Both the prosecution and defence knew it was too ridiculous to suggest Nevill called Bamber prior to shots being fired. As he would have reclaimed the rifle instead. So it had to be the call was made after Nevill received 4 shots.

However supporters know it is equally ridiculous to believe Nevill phoned Bamber after being shot 4 times. So do not promote this.

[Caroline]

Do you know why they came to that conclusion?

Because there would be no need - rather than waste time calling Bamber and leaving Sheila going crazy with a gun, he'd have been more concerned about separating her from it.

[adam]

Nevill phoned Jeremy prior to shots being fired - No say the trial prosecution and defence.

Nevill phoned Jeremy after being shot 4 times - No say everyone else.

----------

So when did Nevill make his call?

[Myster]

And Jeremy didn’t recognise his own father’s voice?

Stop trying to make ridiculous implications

And stop trying to imply it was someone else: it wasn’t

Jeremy received no phone call from the farm

But... but... there must have been a phone call because Jeremy said so...

https://soundcloud.com/phil-garlic/unknown-album

[steve_trousers]

But... but... there must have been a phone call because Jeremy said so...

https://soundcloud.com/phil-garlic/unknown-album

but... no phone call means our Jeremy is guilty and it's all too terrible to bear thinking about so we must keep that call alive at any stretch of credibility. Yes WW2 pilot Nevill couldn't face disarming Sheila himself and squealed for Jeremys help....sob...whimper...

[Inspector Gadget]

But... but... there must have been a phone call because Jeremy said so...

https://soundcloud.com/phil-garlic/unknown-album

Brilliant.
Engaged tone eh.... thought phone was off the hook 🙈

[Caroline]

But... but... there must have been a phone call because Jeremy said so...

https://soundcloud.com/phil-garlic/unknown-album

When Bamber went though what he did the previous evening, he spent much time detailing the programmes he was supposed to have watched but never mentioned having a bath 

[G-Unit]

So when the policeman wrote 'daughter' and 'my gun' he was mishearing what he was told?

[Caroline]

So when the policeman wrote 'daughter' and 'my gun' he was mishearing what he was told?

A policeman didn't write those words, a civilian call handler called Malcolm Bonnet wrote them. When he wrote down that the caller was CD 1990 (PC West) and that "message passed to CD by the son of Mr Bamber after the phone went dead" was he mishearing what he was told?

[APRIL]

It was simply that what Jeremy said became mixed up with what Jeremy alleged his father had said.

[G-Unit]

It was simply that what Jeremy said became mixed up with what Jeremy alleged his father had said.

Is there any evidence upholding that point of view?

[Caroline]

Is there any evidence upholding that point of view?

Yes, the fact that the log states where the call came from - I answered this above.

[G-Unit]

Yes, the fact that the log states where the call came from - I answered this above.

I don't know if it does, reading it.

[Caroline]

I don't know if it does, reading it.

Caller is listed on the left hand side under the time - 'CD 1990' - that is West's ID - If Nevill Bamber called, his name would be displayed in the caller space and surely you can see that at the bottom of the log it states ""message passed to CD by the son of Mr Bamber after the phone went dead" ?

[G-Unit]

Caller is listed on the left hand side under the time - 'CD 1990' - that is West's ID - If Nevill Bamber called, his name would be displayed in the caller space and surely you can see that at the bottom of the log it states ""message passed to CD by the son of Mr Bamber after the phone went dead" ?

It doesn't say that CD 1990 had called does it?

That bottom bit could be an addition.