Author Topic: Now WhiteHouseFarm has ended Will his supporters still continue their campaign?  (Read 8194 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline steve_trousers

Looking at other social media platforms now WHF has ended, interest in the Bamber tragedy in which Jeremy was found guilty of murder, contributors have lost interest and dropped away, as is to be expected

I myself am tired of reading the same tired old claims his supporters repeat ad nauseam: all of which are weak arguments of no substance, and just make him look more guilty by arguing such ludicrous points which only highlight his guilt

Wouldn’t it be better if he simply confessed?

I know he’ll never be freed, but surely that would help his own soul, and he may feel better for confessing

I’m sure his supporters will still write to him, and probably make excuses for why he shot them all dead — so he’ll still receive mail, cash, photos of cakes etc...

Confession is good for the soul: he should do it

Great post, compared to the golden age of say 10-15 years ago, the free Bamber campaign is now truly dead in the water with no place to go.

Every now and then I come back to this forum to rage and vent spleen at his twisted little campaign, but each time I do it seems less necessary than the last. It has now reached the point where all sensible people have abandoned him and only the die hards remain.

I too hoped that he would eventually confess, but your sentence I highlighted above partly explains why he can't. He would lose the only friends he has left as well as his perks within prison. if he were to finally own up to being a child killer his life behind bars would be even more miserable than it is now.

All those years in a cell must have taken their toll. Hopefully he won't make old bones and will just shuffle off sooner rather than later.

Offline Holly Goodhead

I feel he tried to push certain aspects of the case and tried to get to to ignore others. I don't feel manipulated either because I noticed it quite early on - others may not.

IMO he should not be discussing his case with anyone except his lawyers. 

People contact him and he's foolish enough to engage and then people turn on him eg Bob Woffenden, PH and CAL.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline John

IMO he should not be discussing his case with anyone except his lawyers. 

People contact him and he's foolish enough to engage and then people turn on him eg Bob Woffenden, PH and CAL.

Do you think it matters?
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Caroline

IMO he should not be discussing his case with anyone except his lawyers. 

People contact him and he's foolish enough to engage and then people turn on him eg Bob Woffenden, PH and CAL.

Turn on him? What an odd turn of phrase. Why should someone stay silent if they believe he's guilty and trying to pull the wool? No one has an obligation to have an allegiance to Jeremy Bamber.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Great post, compared to the golden age of say 10-15 years ago, the free Bamber campaign is now truly dead in the water with no place to go.

Every now and then I come back to this forum to rage and vent spleen at his twisted little campaign, but each time I do it seems less necessary than the last. It has now reached the point where all sensible people have abandoned him and only the die hards remain.

I too hoped that he would eventually confess, but your sentence I highlighted above partly explains why he can't. He would lose the only friends he has left as well as his perks within prison. if he were to finally own up to being a child killer his life behind bars would be even more miserable than it is now.

All those years in a cell must have taken their toll. Hopefully he won't make old bones and will just shuffle off sooner rather than later.

If I thought JB was guilty I would simply give it all a wide birth on the basis I would presume he would remain behind bars for the rest of his natural life as per his whole life tarrif.

I certainly couldn't muster up the motivation to "rage and vent spleen" on a forum.  Atrocities happen every day.

Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline steve_trousers

If I thought JB was guilty I would simply give it all a wide birth on the basis I would presume he would remain behind bars for the rest of his natural life as per his whole life tarrif.

I certainly couldn't muster up the motivation to "rage and vent spleen" on a forum.  Atrocities happen every day.

No, there was a vile campaign to free him and that needed to be kept in check.

But as I said it's completely dead now, he will die in prison sooner rather than later. Then you will need a new hobby.


Offline Caroline

If I thought JB was guilty I would simply give it all a wide birth on the basis I would presume he would remain behind bars for the rest of his natural life as per his whole life tarrif.

I certainly couldn't muster up the motivation to "rage and vent spleen" on a forum.  Atrocities happen every day.

Most of us don't 'rage and vent spleen' about Bamber being guilty. Sometimes other posters cause such feelings but not Bamber.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

No thanks it makes perfect sense to me.
It makes no sense, read it again:

“No one in their right mind would commit to a crime they hadn't committed unless they were pressured to do so eg Stefan Kiszko”.

You wrote commit instead of admit, admit it!
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Holly Goodhead

Do you think it matters?

JB's conviction will only be quashed based on sound forensic evidence undermining his conviction and no amount of campaigning etc will change that.  Likewise book authors etc changing stance will not change anything either.

Afaik other high profile victims of MOJ's in the past have not engaged directly with the public in the way JB has.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Most of us don't 'rage and vent spleen' about Bamber being guilty. Sometimes other posters cause such feelings but not Bamber.

I think it unlikely a poster on a forum would cause me to feel any strong emotion.

If I think a case is a slam dunk for guilt I can't be bothered eg Vincent Tabak.  I'm only interested in cases which I think involve a moj eg WHF and Rettendon murders or they remain unsolved eg Jill Dando and Madeleine McCann.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Caroline

JB's conviction will only be quashed based on sound forensic evidence undermining his conviction and no amount of campaigning etc will change that.  Likewise book authors etc changing stance will not change anything either.

Afaik other high profile victims of MOJ's in the past have not engaged directly with the public in the way JB has.

That's because they were centred on clearing their name because they were innocent. Jeremy is trying to convince as many people as possible that he is innocent - but he isn't.

Offline Caroline

I think it unlikely a poster on a forum would cause me to feel any strong emotion.

If I think a case is a slam dunk for guilt I can't be bothered eg Vincent Tabak.  I'm only interested in cases which I think involve a moj eg WHF and Rettendon murders or they remain unsolved eg Jill Dando and Madeleine McCann.

I think I remember you getting heated once or twice  @)(++(*

We're all different Holly and it would make for a VERY BORING forum if everyone agreed.

Offline Holly Goodhead

No, there was a vile campaign to free him and that needed to be kept in check.

But as I said it's completely dead now, he will die in prison sooner rather than later. Then you will need a new hobby.

I'm sure the CPS, CCRC and COA are more than capable of determining whether or not any new forensic material undermines a conviction or not.

Those who believe JB guilty are unlikely to know what's going on behind the scenes.

I'll need a new hobby when JB's conviction has been overturned.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

I think I remember you getting heated once or twice  @)(++(*

We're all different Holly and it would make for a VERY BORING forum if everyone agreed.

Heated?  The only time I recall getting heated was when a moderator on the blue forum set out to deceive me.  I certainly would not get heated about a case.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

That's because they were centred on clearing their name because they were innocent. Jeremy is trying to convince as many people as possible that he is innocent - but he isn't.

I disagree.  All the historical high profile MOJ's have benefited from consistent and stable family support.  JB has had all manner of fruit loops involved from the likes of Mike to the dear ladies at CT with their cake baking and graveside reading  8(8-))
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?