You ought to rephrase that, Holly
You’re categorically saying Jeremy Bamber is a victim of a MOJ
He isn’t
He’s been found guilty, lost an appeal, lost a second leave to appeal, lost his appeal at the Human Rights Court, so there isn’t one whiff of evidence that suggests he is innocent
He was rightfully found guilty by the jury — the appeal court judges said so
No amount of wishful thinking will alter the fact Jeremy Bamber shot dead his mother, his father, his sister — and his two six-year-old nephews.
And all for GREED
The fact JB has had two previous appeals heard and rejected is par for the course with high profile cases:
This is what was said about other MOJ's who have subsequently had their convictions quashed:
Stefan Kizsko"We can find no grounds whatsoever to condemn the jury's verdict of murder as in any way safe or unsatisfactory. The appeal is dismissed". Lord Justice Bridge.
Stephen Downing"The court felt that her evidence was not credible and secure enough to allow an appeal against the conviction".
Sally Clarke"Despite recognition of the flaws in Meadow's statistical evidence, the convictions were upheld at appeal in October 2000."
Guildford Four"Both the Guildford Four and the Maguire Seven unsuccessfully sought leave to appeal their convictions immediately".
"The Guildford Four tried to obtain from the Home Secretary a reference to the Court of Appeal under Section 17 of Criminal Appeal Act 1968 (later repeled) but were unsuccessful.
Birmingham 6"In March 1976 their first application for leave to appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal, presided over by Lord Widgery CJ".
"In January 1988 after a six week hearing (at that time the longest criminal hearing ever held), the convictions were ruled to be safe and satisfactory. The Court of Appeal, presided over by the Lord Chief Justice Lord Lane dismissed the appeals".
