Maddie cops seek yet more cash

[Vertigo Swirl]

Hmmm, MET police are sure Cannan murdered S lamplugh, but the CPS said the suspect and the victim cannot be placed together so being sure adds up to diddly squat without the evidence.

Yes, some criminals are never brought to justice despite the fact that those investigsting them are certain they are involved.  This should not be a cause for gloating or celebration by anyone apart perhaps from the criminal and his friends and supporters.  CB certainly seems to have one or two of the latter on this forum.

[Wonderfulspam]

Yes, some criminals are never brought to justice despite the fact that those investigsting them are certain they are involved.  This should not be a cause for gloating or celebration by anyone apart perhaps from the criminal and his friends and supporters.  CB certainly seems to have one or two of the latter on this forum.

That's because he didn't do it.

[Eleanor]

Yes, by not contradicting a single word uttered by the man who has become the spokesperson for the German investigation.

Sheesh.  Is there anything more obvious?

[Wonderfulspam]

Sheesh.  Is there anything more obvious?

Brueckner's innocence? That's been obvious to me for almost 3 years now.

[Lace]

Not when IMO mcs are involved. 

Tell me why you think the McCann's are involved.

[Lace]

Who are you comparing him with D

the ones who have published this.

“If you have information about a police officer or member of staff who works for the Met and is corrupt, abusing their position and power, please call the hotline on 0800 085 0000 so we can act.” Information can also be provided through Crimestoppers online


Whatever you think of your man. seems he should either put up ...or shut up.

We have yet to see how honest HCW IS.

We know for a fact Amaral was dishonest but that doesn't seem to bother you.

[kizzy]

Tell me why you think the McCann's are involved.

Tell you ..............why who do you think "you" are.

[Mr Gray]

I don't recall seeing any opinion being given by the BKA, just by prosecutor Wolters. Perhaps you have a cite?

When Wolters appealed for information re the telephone calll associated with CB...do you think this was part of his own investigation or do you think he was acting on behalf of the BKA.

When he talks about no DNA ...is he talking about his own investigatiion or that of the BKA>

Are you suggesting the BKA dont make any public appeals ...unless Wolters is acting on his own then the BKA have said absolutely nothing in the last 3 yeras,, Anyone who disputes Wolters is speaking for himself and not the BKA must be a bit daft...imo

[kizzy]

We know for a fact Amaral was dishonest but that doesn't seem to bother you.

Why should it bother me?

Silly post really... it's like me saying it doesn't bother you that mccs left babies in harm's way.

Seems there are a lot of dishonest cops around but the majority do a good job.

[Brietta]

The truth is that no-one knows anything about the evidence, the state of the investigations or the likely outcome. Some like to pretend they know more rhan others, but they don't.

Do you think it appropriate for investigators to share evidence with the hoi polloi?  Surely that cannot be police procedure.

[sadie]

Of course, it's merely my opinion... the same as your post and everyone else's.

None of us has any evidence....have they.

Kizzy, my dear

Please, don't underestimate people

[sadie]

That's what three police forces are investigating.  FACT.



Ye and none of them are any closer to solving it.

SY....want more money.

BKH .....maybe next year.

You might be surprised Kizzy.

[G-Unit]

Do you think it appropriate for investigators to share evidence with the hoi polloi?  Surely that cannot be police procedure.

I don't think it's appropriate for investigators to make much publicised claims about what the evidence tells them then still have failed to bring the case before the courts three years later.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I don't think it's appropriate for investigators to make much publicised claims about what the evidence tells them then still have failed to bring the case before the courts three years later.

According to you the investigators have said nothing.

[Brietta]

I don't think it's appropriate for investigators to make much publicised claims about what the evidence tells them then still have failed to bring the case before the courts three years later.

I recall there was a leak involving a member of the public - Amaral, which identified the suspect.  That's the guy whose misconduct of the case ended with him being sacked from it.

There are legitimate instances of police seeking information as a result.  Who knows if that would even have been necessary without Amaral's Saunokonoko podcast interview when he flagged up Bruekner.

The information sought (not leaked) concerned phone numbers ~ vehicles etc

I am aware that Amaral did as you say "make much publicised claims about what the evidence tells them then still have failed to bring the case before the courts" Sandra Felgueiras blew the whistle on that one.

Good that you know that was an indiscretion at the least when one considers Portugal's "strict secrecy laws, possibly more than that.