Maddie cops seek yet more cash

[G-Unit]

People who have criminal records which includes sexual interference with children are included in a register recording such crimes and are investigated as a matter of course should a child protection incident arise.  For example a missing child.

Do you really not know this.

What sort of reputation do you suppose a convicted paedophile enjoys.

So what? Are you saying it's OK to convict a paedophile even if he didn't commit that crime?

[Vertigo Swirl]

So what? Are you saying it's OK to convict a paedophile even if he didn't commit that crime?

Of course she didn’t say that.  And you have the cheek to accuse me of asking tiresome questions.
I note you have twice declined to answer whether or not you would rule CB out of the investigation.  I will therefore assume you would not rule him out, despite the fact that you don’t think there’s any compelling evidence against him and despite the fact that you clearly believe the parents are hiding something.  If I have assumed incorrectly feel free to tell us what you actually do believe.

[Brietta]

So what? Are you saying it's OK to convict a paedophile even if he didn't commit that crime?

Please do not presume to put words into my mouth ~ particularly ones which are so rankly puerile.

[G-Unit]

Please do not presume to put words into my mouth ~ particularly ones which are so rankly puerile.

Your post makes no sense to me. What has reputation to do with anything?

[Mr Gray]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=uxAQSwQuXh8&feature=share
Just watched this. Wolters is very calm and assured and continually starts his sentences with "We". These are not his own thoughts but those of the investigation.
The evidence they have makes him sure CB murdered MM

the interview with HCW is in english

[Mr Gray]

Your post makes no sense to me. What has reputation to do with anything?

Briettas post makes perfect sense so the problem is with you.
It's normal to look at local paedophiles in a case like this..just as it's normal to look at the parents. It's intelligence not evidence.

[G-Unit]

Briettas post makes perfect sense so the problem is with you.
It's normal to look at local paedophiles in a case like this..just as it's normal to look at the parents. It's intelligence not evidence.

It is indeed, but perhaps you can explain if they should be viewed differently if both are never prosecuted due to insufficient evidence?

[Mr Gray]

It is indeed, but perhaps you can explain if they should be viewed differently if both are never prosecuted due to insufficient evidence?

Brietta never said they should...you seem to be imagining things

[G-Unit]

Brietta never said they should...you seem to be imagining things

Maybe so.

[Mr Gray]

It is indeed, but perhaps you can explain if they should be viewed differently if both are never prosecuted due to insufficient evidence?

who has suggested they should

[Brietta]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=uxAQSwQuXh8&feature=share
Just watched this. Wolters is very calm and assured and continually starts his sentences with "We". These are not his own thoughts but those of the investigation.
The evidence they have makes him sure CB murdered MM

Herr Wolters reiterates that Amaral's continued accusations regarding Madeleine's parents are entirely wrong.  Information which when balanced alongside affirmations from all who are privy to the evidence held that they are of no interest to the investigation, the only suspect being Brueckner, makes Amaral nothing more than a conspiracy theorist.  Who in reality, knows nothing.
I don't think they have covered all the bases yet as the indication of more funding for SY suggests to me that this might be a far bigger investigation than Brueckner.  Who may be the only officially declared suspect but there may be more who are of interest, as Sandra tried unsuccessfully to get Herr Wolters to comment on.

[barrier]

Sigh.The bully is wrong again.


He told Portuguese journalist Sandra Felgueiras during an interview last May: “We are convinced he is the murderer of Maddie McCann.

“We have one suspicious person and this is Christian B.

“There is no other person for us who is suspicious.”

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-police-admit-suspect-29371161

[kizzy]

Herr Wolters reiterates that Amaral's continued accusations regarding Madeleine's parents are entirely wrong.  Information which when balanced alongside affirmations from all who are privy to the evidence held that they are of no interest to the investigation, the only suspect being Brueckner, makes Amaral nothing more than a conspiracy theorist.  Who in reality, knows nothing.
I don't think they have covered all the bases yet as the indication of more funding for SY suggests to me that this might be a far bigger investigation than Brueckner.  Who may be the only officially declared suspect but there may be more who are of interest, as Sandra tried unsuccessfully to get Herr Wolters to comment on.

Herr Wolters reiterates that Amaral's continued accusations regarding Madeleine's parents are entirely wrong.

Well just like GA thinks HCW accusations are wrong and CB a scapegoat 

After all, GA  was there he has all the inside knowledge of what was happening at the time.

[jassi]

Sigh.The bully is wrong again.


He told Portuguese journalist Sandra Felgueiras during an interview last May: “We are convinced he is the murderer of Maddie McCann.

“We have one suspicious person and this is Christian B.

“There is no other person for us who is suspicious.”

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-police-admit-suspect-29371161

I wonder who else they looked at  before coming to that conclusion?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Sigh.The bully is wrong again.


He told Portuguese journalist Sandra Felgueiras during an interview last May: “We are convinced he is the murderer of Maddie McCann.

“We have one suspicious person and this is Christian B.

“There is no other person for us who is suspicious.”

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-police-admit-suspect-29371161

He also refused to comment on whether or not he believed Bruckner took Madeleine from the apartment himself which suggests he doesn’t rule out the possibility of an accomplice.