Of course it is - there’s no evidence of a ‘stitch up’ nor that he’s a ‘political prisoner’ its propaganda & nothing more
Bamber jumped on the innocence fraud train and it was full steam ahead for a short time
His abuse of others is clear from the start - the police recognised it then as they do now
“In the last few decades, researchers have been measuring a cluster of traits ready-made to predict abuse — the Dark Tetrad (formerly Triad), a frankly exploitative, aggressive type marked by four traits: narcissism, best thought of, again, as the drive to feel special; psychopathy, a pattern of remorseless lies and manipulation; Machiavellianism, a cold, chess-playing approach to life and love; and finally, sadism, a troubling tendency to delight in the suffering of others. A quick glance at this cluster is enough to give anyone chills. But some of these traits are patently more dangerous than others.
Bamber’s fraudulent ‘innocence campaign’ has exposed all of the above and his true psychopathic character is there for all to see
I don’t understand how anyone can fall for his lies and nonsense. He’s a diagnosed psychopathic, pathological liar and just uses people. His campaign group seems to change frequently, either when he turns on them and gets nasty, or they start to see through him. I think he’s sucked in a new one now...Yvonne? Forgotten her surname, but it’s in yesterday’s Daily Mirror and I don’t recognise the name — but I only know just a few of the names so she may not be new at all. I thought Trudi Benjamin ran it?
What he does — and it’s mainly women — he pulls them in once they’ve written to him by using subtle superficial charm. Once he’s got them smitten, he plays them against each other. I read on Twitter how women have had raging arguments over him when they’ve discovered the other one has received letters when they haven’t had any from him. He manipulates them, and tells them they’re his BEST friend, then stops writing and they wonder what THEY’VE done! He knows by “taking away” their special privileges (receiving his letters) he’ll play on their mind. It keeps them hooked, and keeps him in CONTROL.
When he’s truly angry when one of them doesn’t take out a £3000 loan for him, such as sweet Daisy, he didn’t say anything by letter, he allowed her to travel god knows how many miles to see him, and then took great delight in telling her to her face “I never liked you anyway!”
That’s the sadism in him. He got great satisfaction from that. And he was telling the truth too — anger always reveals the truth. I don’t think he likes any of his campaigners; he knows they’re “soft” for believing his rubbish, and he probably secretly despises them on the quiet.
Poor Sheila! No wonder she became unwell...she grew up with June’s coldness and religious mania, and had a brother who was a psychopath and who, I guarantee, said and did things to her to make her feel TERRIBLE. He was more than instrumental in Sheila becoming ill, I truly think that.
