Author Topic: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence  (Read 127134 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #450 on: May 17, 2020, 07:35:57 PM »
A trillion to one chance 🤓

A billion to one actually based on CPS guidelines:

https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/dna-17-profiling

But hey what's a few billion between friends after all genetically humans are 99.9% alike 🤔
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #451 on: May 17, 2020, 07:38:40 PM »
A billion to one actually based on CPS guidelines:

https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/dna-17-profiling

But hey what's a few billion between friends after all genetically humans are 99.9% alike 🤔

A one billion to one is based on all bands matching which it wasn't with the DNA found in the silencer.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #452 on: May 17, 2020, 07:43:05 PM »
All exhibits were not destroyed Holly

Aunt Agatha has the Chinese trick box, she also had the wetsuit

The surviving relatives received June’s bible

The passage you keep quoting from is misleading

The Chinese trick box and wetsuit were JB's possessions and were not presented at trial.

June Bamber had a number of bibles at WHF.  The one found at soc was given the exhibit number DRH/44 and asfaik was destroyed with all the other exhibits. 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline ISpyWithMyEye

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #453 on: May 17, 2020, 07:48:46 PM »
Is that true? A BTec? Like they gave kids for turning up at a motor pool one day a week and changing a spark plug?

You and Holly are ridiculing a highly qualified Forensic Scientist who has a B.Tech (which you can’t even spell) and which takes up to four years of training to qualify.

That same Forensic Scientist also has a degree in Analytical Chemistry, which also takes years to qualify in.

He’d worked for 13 years as a Forensic Scientist at the Metropolitan Police Laboratory And also at Huntingdon.

You, General, mock him, saying his qualifications are like some boy learning how to change a spark plug once a week at some garage.

What’s YOUR qualifications and career?

[attachment deleted by admin]
Seeking Justice for June & Nevill Bamber, Sheila Caffell & her two six-year-old twin boys who were shot dead in their heads by Psychopath, JEREMY BAMBER who must NEVER be released.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #454 on: May 17, 2020, 07:54:04 PM »
You and Holly are ridiculing a highly qualified Forensic Scientist who has a B.Tech (which you can’t even spell) and which takes up to four years of training to qualify.

That same Forensic Scientist also has a degree in Analytical Chemistry, which also takes years to qualify in.

He’d worked for 13 years as a Forensic Scientist at the Metropolitan Police Laboratory And also at Huntingdon.

You, General, mock him, saying his qualifications are like some boy learning how to change a spark plug once a week at some garage.

What’s YOUR qualifications and career?

I didn't ridicule Brian Elliot's qualifications I simply highlighted:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_and_Technology_Education_Council

Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Admin

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #455 on: May 17, 2020, 07:56:13 PM »
You and Holly are ridiculing a highly qualified Forensic Scientist who has a B.Tech (which you can’t even spell) and which takes up to four years of training to qualify.

That same Forensic Scientist also has a degree in Analytical Chemistry, which also takes years to qualify in.

He’d worked for 13 years as a Forensic Scientist at the Metropolitan Police Laboratory And also at Huntingdon.

You, General, mock him, saying his qualifications are like some boy learning how to change a spark plug once a week at some garage.

What’s YOUR qualifications and career?

The prosecution expert says one thing while the defence expert says the opposite. Can we believe any of these paid jobsworths?

https://www.jstor.org/stable/24868245?seq=1
« Last Edit: May 17, 2020, 08:01:23 PM by Admin »

Offline ISpyWithMyEye

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #456 on: May 17, 2020, 07:56:58 PM »
I'm not the one who misunderstands the evidence.

Yes you are.

You seem somewhat out of your depth in my opinion — Otherwise you’d understand what the reports MEAN

You seem not to have yet comprehended what the report states. Besides that, you frequently ask things which you ought to know. Maybe you’re not that au fait with the case?
Seeking Justice for June & Nevill Bamber, Sheila Caffell & her two six-year-old twin boys who were shot dead in their heads by Psychopath, JEREMY BAMBER who must NEVER be released.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #457 on: May 17, 2020, 08:04:42 PM »
The Chinese trick box and wetsuit were JB's possessions and were not presented at trial.

Where were these ire s seized from and what exhibit numbers were they given ?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #458 on: May 17, 2020, 08:06:27 PM »

June Bamber had a number of bibles at WHF. 

How many bibles were seized by police from WHF ?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #459 on: May 17, 2020, 08:07:17 PM »
The one found at soc was given the exhibit number DRH/44 and asfaik was destroyed with all the other exhibits.

This bible was returned to the surviving family in 2006
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #460 on: May 17, 2020, 08:10:38 PM »
I didn't ridicule Brian Elliot's qualifications I simply highlighted:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_and_Technology_Education_Council

However upon closer examination it appears BTecs were first handed out in 1984 and yet Brian Elliot told the court at trial he had been a forensic scientist for 13 years 🤔

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_and_Technology_Education_Council

Help required. 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Nicholas

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #461 on: May 17, 2020, 08:11:55 PM »
The Chinese trick box and wetsuit were JB's possessions and were not presented at trial.

June Bamber had a number of bibles at WHF.  The one found at soc was given the exhibit number DRH/44 and asfaik was destroyed with all the other exhibits.

Maybe you should ask Bamber, Mark Newby or his CT to provide copies of the paperwork related to all exhibits

These questions have still yet to be answered http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,514.msg9287.html#msg9287

Mike, please could you clarify when JB or his legal team were advised that evidence, in particular blood samples, were going to be or had been destroyed, as happened in 1996.

Likewise, in 2002 the CCRC displayed a willingness to use their powers to examine the full circumstances surrounding the destruction of evidence in 1996. JB instructed Turner QC to decline this offer to investigate.  What reason has JB given for his decision?

“It appears JB rejected a golden opportunity to (possibly) have the EP discredited by the CCRC.
The CCRC would have borne the costs as well - not to be sneezed at.
Had EP been proved to be disingenuous on this matter, the Commission may have allowed 'generous discretion' in viewing related grounds for Appeal.

The silence on this leads to other conspiracy theories - that JB wanted blood samples destroyed fearing DNA developments since 1985... etc.

So I think the matter should be addressed.
« Last Edit: May 17, 2020, 08:14:27 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #462 on: May 17, 2020, 08:13:24 PM »
This bible was returned to the surviving family in 2006

Nicholas what proof exists that DRH/44 was returned to the relatives?

Even if it was, how would it assist with SC's DNA?
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Nicholas

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #463 on: May 17, 2020, 08:15:53 PM »
Nicholas what proof exists that DRH/44 was returned to the relatives?


What proof exists that the bible in question was destroyed ?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline ISpyWithMyEye

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #464 on: May 17, 2020, 08:20:27 PM »
Yes it is true according to his trial testimony. It appears he was better qualified than the ballistics 'expert' who was only able to tell the court about experience which included a small amount with an air rifle as a small boy.


You’re demeaning people again, Holly

Malcolm Fletcher had THIRTEEN YEARS EXPERIENCE working in the HOME OFFICE FORENSIC SCIENCE LABORATORY  in the FIREARMS Department.

You mock him by implying he isn’t an expert by putting ‘expert’, and trying to suggest his only experience was having an air rifle as a small boy.

Why do you try and debase certain people and put them down?

It doesn’t make you look good...
« Last Edit: May 18, 2020, 10:07:20 AM by John »
Seeking Justice for June & Nevill Bamber, Sheila Caffell & her two six-year-old twin boys who were shot dead in their heads by Psychopath, JEREMY BAMBER who must NEVER be released.