I agree, but there must be no room left for hesitation. It came in at 10:2, if just one juror had been taken in by his positive looks etc, then he'd be free.
Looks shouldnt count, but personality can.
They who planned this, had to ensure there were no mistakes. He was portrayed as evil.
My view, not reading into all the hype about his bad behaviour etc, I never fed into it all, has resulted in me finding him kind, considerate, supportive, loyal, he's a joker, friendly and knowledgeable. He's positive in company and makes every effort to ensure your time with him is special. Of me, he asked for nothing but me myself.
I think because you know him (or a version of him), you find it hard to believe he could have committed the heinous crime, so much so that you would rather believe an elaborate woven plot that really has no basis in fact. All the evidence point to Jeremy but I'm interested to hear your theory. Interestingly, when given the opportunity to put forward the evidence that shows Sheila responsible - no one was forth coming.