Paedophiles in Parliament

[Vertigo Swirl]

A psychologist who studied him at length for the government said that McVeigh’s strong narcissistic tendencies, coupled with years of prison isolation, have brought on a grandiose sense of self. “There’s even a sense of immortality here, that somehow execution or death is not real,” the psychologist said. “Instead of being frightened of death, he embraces it.”

[The General]

“Oklahoma City brought him status. And the government he despised handed him the chance to prolong that status when, just days before his original May 16 execution date, the FBI disclosed newly discovered documents that had never been turned over to defense attorneys.

The foul-up gave McVeigh another 25 days of life and brought him yet more attention.

It played into what the prosecution psychologist said was “a combination of [McVeigh’s] narcissism and boredom, and there may be certain grandiose fantasies too.”

“In the narcissism there is a sense of being a legend in one’s own mind,” said the psychologist, who asked that his name be withheld because of his work for the government. “There’s an inflation of one’s self and one’s importance, and sometimes there’s even a sense of immortality, that somehow your execution or death is not real. It becomes so pervaded with grandiosity that, instead of being frightened of death, it’s embraced.

“And he was a sensation seeker. To the max. And being in prison, particularly in general isolation, it’s just exceedingly boring. Particularly if you’re drawn to sensation. He would be deeply bored, enough to feel it consciously day in and day out.”

Objection: prosecution psychologist is not neutral.
Sustained.
Thank you, your honour.

[Caroline]

Objection: prosecution psychologist is not neutral.
Sustained.
Thank you, your honour.

You mean like the one in the Bamber case who classified their client to be a psychopath? 

[The General]

You mean like the one in the Bamber case who found classified their client to be a psychopath? 

That sentence made my eye hurt. But yes, I suppose.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Objection: prosecution psychologist is not neutral.
Sustained.
Thank you, your honour.

Present evidence that McVeigh was judged to be a non-narcissistic psychopath by a neutral psychologist then, and you will have made your point.

[Nicholas]

Former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher knew about an alleged paedophile ring among the Conservative Party in the 1980s, according to the Sunday Mirror.
Ex-Tory activist Anthony Gilberthorpe told the newspaper he was asked to supply cabinet ministers with underage boys for illicit sex parties.
Mr Gilberthorpe claims he handed Thatcher the names of those involved 31 years ago but no action was taken into alleged child sex abuse involving MPs and wider institutions such as the NHS, Secret Service, the Church and the BBC.

Neville Bamber was a wealthy landowner and farmer.  His status within both the community and further afield would have without doubt brought him into contact with individuals within a similar class status and beyond Essex.

Prior to the killings at WHF it is recorded that Neville received a phone call, a call that worried him, possibly frightened him. 

What was that phone call about? 
Was it a threat?

Was Neville the target and killed because he held knowledge that could bring some people in high authority down?
Such things are not unheard of.

Please, watch the whole video, I’ll be back in a few hours and hopefully we can discuss this in a manner without personal attacks etc.  I am here only to debate this theory and will ignore questions outside of this subject.

I look forward to your help.

https://youtu.be/PnZiDxkwgrU


Sónia Poulton. Writer, journalist, broadcaster.   http://www.soniapoulton.co.uk/

 

[Nicholas]

Not just of that. It could have been fraud, homosexuality, a death..
I have no idea yet what is is/was.

Question is:  could he have been the recipient of something illegal/criminal and was he killed as a result?

If that is so, taking into account the phone call he received, then my theory would/could fit into some of the unusual events that night.   

All I ask is debate with an open mind. 

I have no idea what happened inside the house..that’s where your expertise lies.

I believe a lot of evidence including the silencer is just smoke and mirrors. A mere distraction.

 

[Nicholas]

Sónia Poultons work and investigations have been shared worldwide. 

As the video continues Sónia goes into great depth about cover ups, how officers are restricted from bringing any allegations against those in public office or profile.

Dismiss the Freemasonary connection, it is irrelevant based on the info contained in here.

It was widely known that some people in the establishment had a taste and a thirst for the perverse. 

If one is not prepared to look at our history and what was happening during the period of the WHF murders, then this cannot be a debate.

It does not matter when this was made as we are specifically focussing (in this debate) on the establishment and the cover up of the 80’s.

This video and it’s factual research plainly gives an alternative perspective on the murders, which I would like to peruse.



“There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance—that principle is contempt prior to investigation.”

 

[ISpyWithMyEye]

I'm repeating what other people said about June's effect on Sheila. There's not much information about how she affected Jeremy.

That would be because psychopaths don’t have normal emotions, so June’s religious obsession or possible overbearing character wouldn’t have bothered him emotionally. It would have only bothered him when he thought he wasn’t getting what he thought he was entitled to from her e.g. MONEY

[G-Unit]

That would be because psychopaths don’t have normal emotions, so June’s religious obsession or possible overbearing character wouldn’t have bothered him emotionally. It would have only bothered him when he thought he wasn’t getting what he thought he was entitled to from her e.g. MONEY

Or fair treatment. June was planning a regular allowance for Sheila. That would have ended her Social Security payments of course (if she declared it).

[Caroline]

Or fair treatment. June was planning a regular allowance for Sheila. That would have ended her Social Security payments of course (if she declared it).

Fair treatment? Are you joking? Two trips to the other side of the world, bail out money, a free car, free fuel, a house, shares in the caravan park ........ what don't you think was fair?

[G-Unit]

Fair treatment? Are you joking? Two trips to the other side of the world, bail out money, a free car, free fuel, a house, shares in the caravan park ........ what don't you think was fair?

He was well paid for a farm worker but he worked long hours.

[barrier]

He was well paid for a farm worker but he worked long hours.

Was he paid or did he take a wage,there's a difference.

[Eleanor]

Was he paid or did he take a wage,there's a difference.

Why?

[APRIL]

He was well paid for a farm worker but he worked long hours.

The simple fact of him being there doesn't necessarily equate with him putting his back into working.