Author Topic: Paedophiles in Parliament  (Read 68472 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ISpyWithMyEye

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #390 on: May 15, 2020, 09:32:20 AM »
It’s worth bearing in mind that “Jeremy Is Innocent” is also just an opinion, not a fact.

Gunit doesn’t think the ludicrous idea that Jeremy is innocent is just an opinion ; she claims he IS innocent.

Just like Holly does.

Seeking Justice for June & Nevill Bamber, Sheila Caffell & her two six-year-old twin boys who were shot dead in their heads by Psychopath, JEREMY BAMBER who must NEVER be released.

Offline mrswah

  • Senior Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2177
  • Total likes: 802
  • Thinking outside the box, as usual-------
Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #391 on: May 15, 2020, 10:01:44 AM »
Gunit doesn’t think the ludicrous idea that Jeremy is innocent is just an opinion ; she claims he IS innocent.

Just like Holly does.


G-Unit does not claim Jeremy is innocent.  She questions his conviction, as do I.


Offline mrswah

  • Senior Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2177
  • Total likes: 802
  • Thinking outside the box, as usual-------
Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #392 on: May 15, 2020, 10:03:57 AM »

But a good moderator should be diplomatic and unbiased.

It’s noticeable how you and your small clique of some other mods only like one another posts; never like certain members who you see as controversial — even if they’ve made a good valid point. If you show favouritism to a select few, regardless of how wring some of their posts sometimes are, it puts people off from contributing

No-one wants to belong to a forum that’s run by a small clique of moderators who aren’t prepared to listen to valid arguments...it becomes a pointless exercise.

If you think my moderating is unfair (as you are perfectly entitled to do), there is nothing to stop you reporting me to John.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #393 on: May 15, 2020, 10:05:08 AM »
Gunit doesn’t think the ludicrous idea that Jeremy is innocent is just an opinion ; she claims he IS innocent.

Just like Holly does.

More misinformation from Ispy.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline John

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #394 on: May 15, 2020, 10:50:48 AM »
It has been brought to my attention that some posters are still using inappropriate comments and remarks towards other members on the boards. Forum rules dictate that all responses should be amicable and constructive, there is no need to express any opinion or respond to any question aggressively.

Please keep this in mind guys when posting. TY
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #395 on: May 16, 2020, 08:53:45 PM »
At the time of jeremy’s trial and the lead up to it, Leon Britton was Home Secretary.

It has been stated recently in the newspapers that Jeremy was sexually abused as a child.  This WAS NOT committed by his father.

I am aware of  prominent individuals who I cannot name for legal reasons, who have been named as ‘active’ in the past.

Please review the video attached below and we can take it from there.

Any insults, goading or Unnecessary unpleasantness And I’m off here for good.

Please note, NONE of this information has been received from Jeremy to me.  This is ongoing research and I’m limited to what I can or cannot share at this moment.

In my view, it is important for us to step back in time, to the 1980’s, to understand the culture and practices of that day. 

Were Neville and June both aware of what was going on in some echelons of high society? 

Could Neville have been killed and Jeremy deliberately framed?

The probability of an outsider committing these crimes was denounced by the Judge at trial stating that if Sheila could not have committed the murders then it had to be Jeremy, even though there has never been anything to tie him to the scene of the crime.

Could this case be that simple?

 Was Neville and June murdered, through fear from others of being exposed by the couple?

If Jeremy was framed, there would be no reason to look outside of this family. 

I’ll be back tomorrow.


https://youtu.be/Fi_x090LGO8



« Last Edit: May 16, 2020, 09:02:26 PM by Aunt Agatha »

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #396 on: May 16, 2020, 09:04:20 PM »
Thanks AA.  Will listen to later.  8((()*/
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #397 on: May 16, 2020, 09:23:40 PM »
even though there has never been anything to tie him to the scene of the crime.


Bamber claimed he received a phone-call from NB claiming NB said SC had ‘THE gun’ -  this ties him to the SOC

Have you ever read Bamber’s witness statements Aunt Agatha?
« Last Edit: May 16, 2020, 09:26:25 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #398 on: May 16, 2020, 09:34:26 PM »

It has been stated recently in the newspapers that Jeremy was sexually abused as a child

This is not recent Aunt Agatha

But Jeremy’s close friend Brett Collins said there might be a reason for his demeanour:

’When Jeremy was 11 he was sexually molested by older boys and that deeply affected him.’

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3157376/Now-know-Bamber-did-Crime-writer-s-definitive-verdict-public-schoolboy-slaughtered-entire-family-30-years-ago-tried-frame-dead-sister-protested-innocence.html

« Last Edit: May 16, 2020, 09:44:09 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #399 on: May 16, 2020, 09:44:57 PM »
This is not recent Aunt Agatha

But Jeremy’s close friend Brett Collins said there might be a reason for his demeanour:

’When Jeremy was 11 he was sexually molested by older boys and that deeply affected him.’

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3157376/Now-know-Bamber-did-Crime-writer-s-definitive-verdict-public-schoolboy-slaughtered-entire-family-30-years-ago-tried-frame-dead-sister-protested-innocence.html





You’re wrong!! You’re info is wrong!!!!

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #400 on: May 16, 2020, 09:50:20 PM »

You’re wrong!! You’re info is wrong!!!!

The Mirror claimed ‘Bamber had suffered abuse while he was at boarding school’

Aunt Agathas you stated


Please note, NONE of this information has been received from Jeremy to me.


What info is ‘wrong’ ?

« Last Edit: May 16, 2020, 09:53:24 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Caroline

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #401 on: May 16, 2020, 09:52:32 PM »
At the time of jeremy’s trial and the lead up to it, Leon Britton was Home Secretary.

It has been stated recently in the newspapers that Jeremy was sexually abused as a child.  This WAS NOT committed by his father.

I am aware of  prominent individuals who I cannot name for legal reasons, who have been named as ‘active’ in the past.

Please review the video attached below and we can take it from there.

Any insults, goading or Unnecessary unpleasantness And I’m off here for good.

Please note, NONE of this information has been received from Jeremy to me.  This is ongoing research and I’m limited to what I can or cannot share at this moment.

In my view, it is important for us to step back in time, to the 1980’s, to understand the culture and practices of that day. 

Were Neville and June both aware of what was going on in some echelons of high society? 

Could Neville have been killed and Jeremy deliberately framed?

The probability of an outsider committing these crimes was denounced by the Judge at trial stating that if Sheila could not have committed the murders then it had to be Jeremy, even though there has never been anything to tie him to the scene of the crime.

Could this case be that simple?

 Was Neville and June murdered, through fear from others of being exposed by the couple?

If Jeremy was framed, there would be no reason to look outside of this family. 

I’ll be back tomorrow.


https://youtu.be/Fi_x090LGO8

He is tied to the CS by the phone call AA - a call only he has knowledge of and in which his father is supposed to have said "Sheila has gone crazy, she's got the gun'.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #402 on: May 16, 2020, 09:56:14 PM »
Please note, NONE of this information has been received from Jeremy to me.

If Bamber has never mentioned this ‘information’ to you why are you even going there ?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #403 on: May 16, 2020, 10:02:48 PM »




You’re wrong!! You’re info is wrong!!!!

Did Bamber’s ever talk to you about his relationship with Anji Greaves AA ?

And did you know the campaign team had wrongly referred to Virginia ?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #404 on: May 16, 2020, 10:08:04 PM »
I’ve read the phone statements and reports, yes.

So, because the receiver was off the hook upon entry, that concludes jeremys guilt?