Author Topic: ASK; JEREMY BAMBER  (Read 33540 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline The General

Re: ASK; JEREMY BAMBER
« Reply #90 on: May 23, 2020, 07:47:20 PM »
Killer Jeremy Bamber makes chilling coronavirus lockdown vow from prison 20th April 2020 by Andy Gardner & Matthew Young

He wrote in a blog: “We are, like all of you, following strict social distancing measures in the prison.

So, with the extra time for work in my cell, I’m preparing an additional project with the campaign admin Yvonne Hartley.

“We work really well on the case material together and there is a lot more coming to light.”

Yvonne, 53, said she last spoke to Bamber on Thursday in a phone call. She said: “We have come across new things whilst studying the material.

“The case is always evolving and we are still working on the Criminal Cases Review Commission appeal.”

Bamber’s legal team are preparing a submission to the CCRC in a desperate bid to get his case returned to the Court of Appeal.

They are first waiting to hear about a Judicial Review application against the Crown Prosecution Service, over claims prosecutors refused to disclose key documents to the defence during the 1986 trial.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/killer-jeremy-bambers-chilling-coronavirus-21898177
Is there a question for Bamber?
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Caroline

Re: ASK; JEREMY BAMBER
« Reply #91 on: May 23, 2020, 09:19:00 PM »
I have paid for my email to him and I have paid for a reply through email. 

As soon as he’s given access to reply, he can, by email.

Everybody on here is adamant that they know everything.

Guys, you continue to put out false information.  It has to stop.

I don't think anyone here has said they know everything and I take offence to your remark. I've always treated you with respect and see no reason for you to do otherwise. Email must be relatively new and you could have just said that.

Is everything you've 'put out' totally kosha with no mistakes?

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: ASK; JEREMY BAMBER
« Reply #92 on: May 23, 2020, 09:49:29 PM »

I just Googled and you’re right, Ag

However, he can’t reply on a computer; he has to write his reply to your email on paper, and then the prison staff check it and email it to you

It says that as it’s Bank Holiday things will be slower, so you probably won’t hear until later next week

Do you think he will be surprised to hear from you after all this time?  And do you think he’ll respond straight away?

https://www.gov.uk/staying-in-touch-with-someone-in-prison/the-internet-and-social-media




Ah, that’s how it works!

So an orderly queue is being formed huh to get the mail out.  I did wonder how it was going to be achieved.


Regarding his thoughts or views to my email, we will have to wait and see.  I would not have contacted him if I did not think I’d get a reply.  I haven’t done anything wrong for him to blank me completely.

I’ve not betrayed him, I’ve not spoken to journalists or authors, I’ve not published letters nor have I divulged any of our private conversations outside of the case itself.  I’ve not tried to make money off of my relationship with him either as some have done therefore, I cannot see reason into why he would completely ignore me.

We had our troubles some years ago, I protested my innocence as best I could and walked away when I found out I was outnumbered.  Mmany people were writing to him, wasting his time and distracting him from his CCRC application that was very important to him, informing him of antics instigated and performed by other person  in the hope of blaming me and Therefore removing me from my position amongst his inner circle of friends.

I was never a threat to these people. I was a confidant, he ran everything by me  or sought opinion Before subscribing to anything. He valued my honest evaluation of media reporting and many a time I did not view the work and results of the CT as was relayed to him by them.   What they thought was positive media attention I might have Thought the opposite and I was in a position to relay that to him.  He trusted me implicitly and would then relay these concerns to the CT.   

Haha, that position didn’t last long - I had to go. 

But hey, he had a new team around him and maybe it was time for me to move on. 

I was very upset at first, well, I was upset for a couple of years if I be honest, I was concerned for his well being most of all, for many reasons after all he’d been betrayed and lied to in the past.  I was just one of a very small handful of ‘constants’ around him.  Over the years, some slipped away but I remained and did what I could.  I was merely a friend.

I have no idea whether any of those who removed me remain in contact,with him or are now part of his inner circle.  Some will be, of that I’m sure!

If the CT are reading this, then I would come to the same conclusions as you, that they are not going to want me back and therefore will do everything within their power to ensure he does not go through with this Q&A session and at the same time do all they can to discredit I me again as much as possible to ensure any possible friendship or communication or trust between us, be eliminated immediately.

I could be wrong, but these are my initial thoughts and views.....or maybe, I’m not that important at all, and my request will be accepted as he recognises that this is an alternative form of communication with the ‘nay sayers’.




« Last Edit: May 23, 2020, 10:17:20 PM by Aunt Agatha »

Offline Caroline

Re: ASK; JEREMY BAMBER
« Reply #93 on: May 23, 2020, 09:56:49 PM »

I just Googled and you’re right, Ag

However, he can’t reply on a computer; he has to write his reply to your email on paper, and then the prison staff check it and email it to you

It says that as it’s Bank Holiday things will be slower, so you probably won’t hear until later next week

Do you think he will be surprised to hear from you after all this time?  And do you think he’ll respond straight away?

https://www.gov.uk/staying-in-touch-with-someone-in-prison/the-internet-and-social-media

Actually Spy, it says some prisons do allow prisoners to use email - this much be relatively new. I doubt with Jeremy's category, he will be allowed to use it but don't quote me on that, I wouldn't like to think I was putting false information out there!  8((()*/

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: ASK; JEREMY BAMBER
« Reply #94 on: May 23, 2020, 10:01:06 PM »
Actually Spy, it says some prisons do allow prisoners to use email - this much be relatively new. I doubt with Jeremy's category, he will be allowed to use it but don't quote me on that, I wouldn't like to think I was putting false information out there!  8((()*/

I've received an email from him which is basically a scan of his handwritten letter.  It's just the prison service scanning and emailing instead of putting it in the postal service.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Caroline

Re: ASK; JEREMY BAMBER
« Reply #95 on: May 23, 2020, 10:02:53 PM »
I've received an email from him which is basically a scan of his handwritten letter.  It's just the prison service scanning and emailing instead of putting it in the postal service.

So it wasn't actually me putting out false information afterall - thanks  8((()*/

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: ASK; JEREMY BAMBER
« Reply #96 on: May 23, 2020, 10:05:18 PM »

Don’t know who Yvonne is, but most of his team seem to be women...

I know the ones I’ve seen all seem odd to me, and possibly they want to keep him there if they’re earning “fag money” and feel needed..

But they don’t control him — he controls them.

He manipulates, you must know that




I would now beg to differ Ispy.  The tables have turned.

Eg: if he thought my suggestion was a good idea, an opportunity for him to speak directly to the people, and he wanted to go ahead with it the CT are now in a position to manipulate and control him.

All they need to do his threaten him. If he goes ahead with this Q&A session, then they will cease to work for him.

His power has been removed and THAT is what always concerned me.  I could see it from the off. 


Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: ASK; JEREMY BAMBER
« Reply #97 on: May 23, 2020, 10:12:16 PM »
I don't think anyone here has said they know everything and I take offence to your remark. I've always treated you with respect and see no reason for you to do otherwise. Email must be relatively new and you could have just said that.

Is everything you've 'put out' totally kosha with no mistakes?



Hi apologies Caroline, It was not a personal attack on you. I quickly replied as I had a busy day ahead of me and it was a reply to all members who try to presume things which are not correct without facts.

I didn’t mean to offend you personally. Sorry.

Offline Caroline

Re: ASK; JEREMY BAMBER
« Reply #98 on: May 23, 2020, 10:14:41 PM »


Hi apologies Caroline, It was not a personal attack on you. I quickly replied as I had a busy day ahead of me and it was a reply to all members who try to presume things which are not correct without facts.

I didn’t mean to offend you personally. Sorry.

OK - no harm done, but I do try and fact check everything I post. Apology accepted.

Offline Nicholas

Re: ASK; JEREMY BAMBER
« Reply #99 on: May 23, 2020, 10:18:49 PM »



I would now beg to differ Ispy.  The tables have turned.

Eg: if he thought my suggestion was a good idea, an opportunity for him to speak directly to the people, and he wanted to go ahead with it the CT are now in a position to manipulate and control him.

All they need to do his threaten him. If he goes ahead with this Q&A session, then they will cease to work for him.

His power has been removed and THAT is what always concerned me.  I could see it from the off.

You’re wrong
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: ASK; JEREMY BAMBER
« Reply #100 on: May 23, 2020, 10:21:40 PM »



Ah, that’s how it works!

So an orderly queue is being formed huh to get the mail out.  I did wonder how it was going to be achieved.


Regarding his thoughts or views to my email, we will have to wait and see.  I would not have contacted him if I did not think I’d get a reply.  I haven’t done anything wrong for him to blank me completely.

I’ve not betrayed him, I’ve not spoken to journalists or authors, I’ve not published letters nor have I divulged any of our private conversations outside of the case itself.  I’ve not tried to make money off of my relationship with him either as some have done therefore, I cannot see reason into why he would completely ignore me.

We had our troubles some years ago, I protested my innocence as best I could and walked away when I found out I was outnumbered.  Mmany people were writing to him, wasting his time and distracting him from his CCRC application that was very important to him, informing him of antics instigated and performed by other person  in the hope of blaming me and Therefore removing me from my position amongst his inner circle of friends.

I was never a threat to these people. I was a confidant, he ran everything by me  or sought opinion Before subscribing to anything. He valued my honest evaluation of media reporting and many a time I did not view the work and results of the CT as was relayed to him by them.   What they thought was positive media attention I might have Thought the opposite and I was in a position to relay that to him.  He trusted me implicitly and would then relay these concerns to the CT.   

Haha, that position didn’t last long - I had to go. 

But hey, he had a new team around him and maybe it was time for me to move on. 

I was very upset at first, well, I was upset for a couple of years if I be honest, I was concerned for his well being most of all, for many reasons after all he’d been betrayed and lied to in the past.  I was just one of a very small handful of ‘constants’ around him.  Over the years, some slipped away but I remained and did what I could.  I was merely a friend.

I have no idea whether any of those who removed me remain in contact,with him or are now part of his inner circle.  Some will be, of that I’m sure!

If the CT are reading this, then I would come to the same conclusions as you, that they are not going to want me back and therefore will do everything within their power to ensure he does not go through with this Q&A session and at the same time do all they can to discredit I me again as much as possible to ensure any possible friendship or communication or trust between us, be eliminated immediately.

I could be wrong, but these are my initial thoughts and views.....or maybe, I’m not that important at all, and my request will be accepted as he recognises that this is an alternative form of communication with the ‘nay sayers’.

Who do you think has taken your ‘position’ ?
« Last Edit: May 23, 2020, 10:23:42 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: ASK; JEREMY BAMBER
« Reply #101 on: May 23, 2020, 10:21:51 PM »
OK - no harm done, but I do try and fact check everything I post. Apology accepted.




You do and I applaud you.  8@??)(

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: ASK; JEREMY BAMBER
« Reply #102 on: May 23, 2020, 10:22:58 PM »
You’re wrong



It’s an opinion, that’s all.  I could be wrong and I hope I am.

Offline Nicholas

Re: ASK; JEREMY BAMBER
« Reply #103 on: May 23, 2020, 10:24:37 PM »


It’s an opinion, that’s all.  I could be wrong and I hope I am.

 *%87
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: ASK; JEREMY BAMBER
« Reply #104 on: May 23, 2020, 10:24:55 PM »
Who do you think has taken your ‘position’ ?




I have absolutely no idea, I’ve not looked into it. When I moved away, I literally did that and was not going to upset myself by trying to find out who was his best friend.  It’s none of my business.