New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Vertigo Swirl]

So what was the lead on Brueckner?
Was it the no witnesses placing him at the scene or the there being nothing to suggest he in particular was responsible for Madeleine's disappearance?

You’re being absurdly obtuse now which means we can only go round in circles which I’m not interested in doing.  Clearly you think the PJ did a fantastic job and that they did the right thing by ruling out a known local child abuser (whose features resemble those given by an eyewitness close to the apartment) with a simple knock on the door.  I don’t share your opinion.  Nothing more to be said.

[Vertigo Swirl]

The one thing that can be read in to this is the Germans clearly do not have unequivocal evidence of the demise of Madeleine and their suspects link to it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10162107/Madeline-McCanns-parents-claim-Cleo-Smiths-rescue-gives-hope.html

Wow, you sure can read a lot into that article, well done!

[Wonderfulspam]

You’re being absurdly obtuse now which means we can only go round in circles which I’m not interested in doing.  Clearly you think the PJ did a fantastic job and that they did the right thing by ruling out a known local child abuser (whose features resemble those given by an eyewitness close to the apartment) with a simple knock on the door.  I don’t share your opinion.  Nothing more to be said.

I'm looking forward to seeing these 'closely matching features' which pointed directly to Brueckner.

What were they again?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I'm looking forward to seeing these 'closely matching features' which pointed directly to Brueckner.

What were they again?

When you stop being a twerp we can resume the conversation until then, not playing with you anymore.

[Wonderfulspam]

When you stop being a twerp we can resume the conversation until then, not playing with you anymore.

You claim a witness gave a description matching Brueckner.

Let's hear this incriminating description?

[Vertigo Swirl]

You claim a witness gave a description matching Brueckner.

Let's hear this incriminating description?

Is there really any point?  I can already predict your reaction.  If you want to find it look through my posts.  Enjoy, I’ve written some great ones over the years… 

[Wonderfulspam]

Is there really any point? I can already predict your reaction.  If you want to find it look through my posts.  Enjoy, I’ve written some great ones over the years… 

Of course there is, this is the clincher the police ignored when they should have noticed it points directly to Brueckner.

So. which witness description?

Paul Gordon, Tamsin Sillence?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Of course there is, this is the clincher the police ignored when they should have noticed it points directly to Brueckner.

So. which witness description?

Paul Gordon, Tamsin Sillence?

Here you go Lazy Bones,mfrom Tasmin Sillence’s statement
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=12205.msg664937#msg664937

[G-Unit]

Here you go Lazy Bones,mfrom Tasmin Sillence’s statement
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=12205.msg664937#msg664937

Really?

[Wonderfulspam]

Here you go Lazy Bones,mfrom Tasmin Sillence’s statement
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=12205.msg664937#msg664937

Yes, it positively screams Brueckner doesn't it.

 & the e-fit is a dead ringer.

Anyone looking at this would immediately suspect Brueckner.

[Wonderfulspam]

Really?

Yes, this was the picture that should have caused the police to beat a path directly to Brueckner's door, much like what happened in the Cleo Smith case.

Here was a man who had eyes, nose, ears & hair, sometimes wore sunglasses.

It's pretty obvious it's him & couldn't be just about anyone else with a face & hair that sometimes wore sunglasses.

[barrier]

Yes, it positively screams Brueckner doesn't it.

 & the e-fit is a dead ringer.

Anyone looking at this would immediately suspect Brueckner.

Except for OG.

[Wonderfulspam]

Except for OG.

Ah, but they don't have the extra evidence Wolters has.

[Vertigo Swirl]

As predicted - my post was ridiculed.

Yes, really.  The police are supposed to follow up on leads.  Here was a lead in which the description given closely matched Bruckner's in many respects.  Upon what basis do you think Bruckner could have been dismissed without interview and just an unanswered knock on the door upon the basis of her witness statement? 

Concerning the individual, she describes him as being:
Caucasian race ✅
 light skin ✅
 so he wasn't Portuguese ✅
but could be British - not right
Approximately 180 cm tall ✅
thin complexion tick ✅
30/35 years of age ✅
. Short hair ✅
like shaved with 1 cm of length - maybe
and fair tick ✅
She didn't see the eyes because he wore dark glasses of black colour -  known to wear black sunglasses
with a structure of mass, a thick frame - but no phtos of him seen in a pair like this.
He had a large forehead ✅
 Nose of normal size tick ✅
 a bit pointy and sharp - could be describe as such
Large ears, close against the head -similar to those shown in photofit
Mouth with thin lips ✅
Chin pointing up, which stood out on a face that she describes as sharp - could be described as sharp featured.
No beard, no moustache, a clean shave ✅
No other special signs, apart from some small pimples on the face as a result of shaving - Bruckner has acne scarring
He looked ugly, even 'disgusting' - could be described as such.

[Wonderfulspam]

As predicted - my post was ridiculed.

Yes, really.  The police are supposed to follow up on leads.  Here was a lead in which the description given closely matched Bruckner's in many respects.  Upon what basis do you think Bruckner could have been dismissed without interview and just an unanswered knock on the door upon the basis of her witness statement?

I'm still unclear as to what was the close match to Brueckner?

What was so distinctive that singled Brueckner out from any other roughly 6 foot, blonde white men?