New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[pathfinder73]

It is worth remembering that Portugal have primacy in this crime.

I wonder why they are still convinced that the parents are guilty ?

Unreliable dogs according to VS   

[sadie]

The only sense I can make from all this is - its a brainwashing tactic that they have got there man

Not a very desirable one either so no one will care if he did it or not - he is going to be a scapegoat

It seems to me it is all being played out on another theatrical stage.

Another thing started in the middle - have they searched any of the ground/s where he stayed or lived ect ect


but we know what the ending will be they know it's him but not enough evidence to charge.

We have been told from invisible sources he did it he is the abductor - so that's the end of that.

Case closed we have our man - no closure/ justice of what really happened that night to Madie Mccann.

THE END......my post is my opinion on all this circus being played out

I see this from the opposite direction to you.  surprise, surprise!

He is a horrible person, but I think that he could be the 'fall guy' for the powerful person who commissioned him (and his small group) to abduct Madeleine.   I doubt very much that Madeleine has ever been left alone with him, or in his van, or car.  I believe that Madeleine was whooshed straight up to Porto (VN de Gaia) before being taken elsewhere, not so far away, and kept in an orphan boys home there!!

And I believe that I know at least two other countries with more exact pinpointed places where Madeleine has been kept.  And that is all that I can say.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

Martin Smith seems pretty sure he saw Madeleine's abductor & it wasn't CB. You have to wonder why, given that he couldn't identify Madeleine as the child being carried.

His first statement was reported thus: "Having already seen various photographs of MADELEINE and televised images, states that the child who was carried by the individual could have been her. He cannot state this as fact but is convinced that it could have been MADELEINE, also the opinion shared by his family."

[misty]

His first statement was reported thus: "Having already seen various photographs of MADELEINE and televised images, states that the child who was carried by the individual could have been her. He cannot state this as fact but is convinced that it could have been MADELEINE, also the opinion shared by his family."

That opinion was shared by thousands of people who saw a child resembling Madeleine in the days following her disappearance - people who saw a little girl's face, sometimes complete with an eye defect. The Smith family statements would have more credence if they were certain they'd seen Madeleine being carried by an unknown man....but they didn't see the child's face nor would they recognise the man again. The sttements clealy weren't important enough for the PJ to investigate further as a priority between May & September 2007.

[pathfinder73]

His first statement was reported thus: "Having already seen various photographs of MADELEINE and televised images, states that the child who was carried by the individual could have been her. He cannot state this as fact but is convinced that it could have been MADELEINE, also the opinion shared by his family."

The Smiths saw MM in a deep sleep! Smithman will never come forward - he's had 13 years. His time is up! No record of him at the night creche. Everything points to him so must be the final lead that they have been trying to keep secret until the Germans butt in LOL.

[barrier]

That opinion was shared by thousands of people who saw a child resembling Madeleine in the days following her disappearance - people who saw a little girl's face, sometimes complete with an eye defect. The Smith family statements would have more credence if they were certain they'd seen Madeleine being carried by an unknown man....but they didn't see the child's face nor would they recognise the man again. The sttements clealy weren't important enough for the PJ to investigate further as a priority between May & September 2007.

Important enough to turn attention to Smithman from Tannerman by Redwood the DCI back when the revelation moment happened,matching the description close to that of Madeline McCann or words to that effect .Only one child unaccounted for that night.

[faithlilly]

That opinion was shared by thousands of people who saw a child resembling Madeleine in the days following her disappearance - people who saw a little girl's face, sometimes complete with an eye defect. The Smith family statements would have more credence if they were certain they'd seen Madeleine being carried by an unknown man....but they didn't see the child's face nor would they recognise the man again. The sttements clealy weren't important enough for the PJ to investigate further as a priority between May & September 2007.

Amaral brought Martin Smith and some of his family back to PDL for a reconstruction of the meeting. It’s slightly disingenuous to say that they didn’t investigate further.

[misty]

Amaral brought Martin Smith and some of his family back to PDL for a reconstruction of the meeting. It’s slightly disingenuous to say that they didn’t investigate further.

What was so important about the Smith sighting that the family had to do a reconstruction of more importance than one by the T9? Furthermore, what did PJ actually do about the sighting following the Smiths' reconstruction?

[Brietta]

The Smiths saw MM in a deep sleep! Smithman will never come forward - he's had 13 years. His time is up! No record of him at the night creche. Everything points to him!

Why have the Policia Judiciaria never bothered to publicise the smith sighting at any time?  could it be they never set much store by it since Amaral sat on it between their visit in May and September, months later?

[misty]

Important enough to turn attention to Smithman from Tannerman by Redwood the DCI back when the revelation moment happened,matching the description close to that of Madeline McCann or words to that effect .Only one child unaccounted for that night.

I must have missed Redwood supplying the public with a description of the clothing Smithman was wearing that night, such was the importance of identifying the man.

[sadie]

I agree it wasn't just a guess.  Now we just have to work out in whose interest it is (according to German law that when a suspect is named he is entitled to see all the files in the case against him) for a person being investigated re Madeleine McCann to have large hints made to the media about who he is.

So why did Amaral talk about the jailed German paedophile to the Australian media in April of this year.

Interesting, Brie.  Now I wont be able to go to sleep, thinking about it.

[sadie]

So why did Amaral talk about the jailed German paedophile to the Australian media in April of this year.



Well, IMO B to show how corrupt it all is - and it is.

Nah, I don't think so.

Something else is tugging at my brain 

[sadie]

How did he abduct her? No evidence of Madeleine in his vehicles.  Smithman was heading towards the beach and not in the direction of his property.

I suggest that you try and do some lateral thinking.

[sadie]

Care to provide a cite for your first sentence ?

Whether Anthro can find the cite , or not, most of us will have seen it.  I certainly have

Amaral saying that Gerry was not involved after all.

After all that he has said before, that took a lot of saying for Amaral. 

I wonder why he said it? 

Then?



How intriguing   

[sadie]

 I replied to someone stating as FACT that the PJ didn't flag him up as someone with a record of violent rape.

Details of the rape only came to light in 2017 when someone stole a video tape so it was an impossibility for them to know the details. Please don't try and label someone a child abuse sympathiser for pointing out FACTS.

You don't think that Amaral was covering up for CB, do you Gertrude?