http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11585.msg606648#msg606648
"Lord knows what else..."
I have a compelling theory which ticks all the boxes which is more than can be said for the CB theory.
Thank you for that. The full post says ...
So he's not a versatile career criminal who films his crime of rape of an older woman and the Lord alone knows what else ~ has convictions for molesting children ~ is a drug dealer ~ with access to expensive vehicles ~ is a prolific and obviously very good at it burglar ~ whose phone activated antennae in Praia da Luz just before Madeleine disappeared.
But as Amaral confirms, managed to slip through the net because he wasn't in when the police called on him ... I don't think for a minute that his convictions are reliant on a string of friends of a friend. I think he's a nefarious person with a criminal record which proves it ... which of course doesn't make him guilty of being Madeleine's abductor ... but it sure does make him a person of interest worthy of further investigation.
If nothing else is enjoyable about this the twisting and turning of sceptics whose main battle cry was "JUSTICE for MADELEINE" at the same time as they pilloried her parents is certainly giving me time for a wry smile: the Germans are doing their level best to do just that (justice for Madeleine) and are not doing too well in the popularity stakes as a result:(
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11585.msg606648#msg606648We all know the identity of the victim of your so called "compelling theory".
I think you are defending the indefensible as far as your malice towards this innocent woman is concerned. The boxes being ticked by her for you leads me to one of two conclusions.
- your posts are narcissistic
- your posts are a wind up
Whichever one or both it may be I don't think discussion of your theory lends anything to the debate.