quote author=pathfinder73 link=topic=11585.msg610533#msg610533 date=1595111202]
From that distance away I'm not surprised she did not recognise Totman because she turned left on to the pathway and did not pass Gerry or Jez IMO. "It is emphasised that one of the members of the group, Jane, at about 21.10 - 21.15 when she was going to her apartment to check on her children, she saw from the back, at a distance of about 50 metres, on the road bordering the club, an individual from the rear end; carrying a child, wearing pyjamas, Jane will be able to clarify this situation ." https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN.htm "Later, a member of the group, Russell's partner Jane, when she went to her apartment to see her children at around 9.15pm, saw from the back [rear] about 50 metres away, on the perimeter road of the club, a long-haired person, in what she thinks were jeans, with a child in his arms and walking very quickly. But she is better able to tell you about that herself ." https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/KATE-MCCANN.htm Please note: For emphasis, I have enlarged the last words in both Gerry and Kates statements FGS Pathfinder. You are desperate aren't you? ... to quote third party descriptions, twice repeated, of what Jane saw
You take third party descriptions given by sleep deprived, emotionally drained and exhausted Gerry and kate ( after they had been up virtually all night worrying and searching) of what Jane saw. This is NOT what Kate or Gerry saw. You take these third party descriptions rather than the ones from Jane herself! Why ?
What ever is the matter with you that you feel the need to give such stuff out when you have seen on The Cutting Edge Video Jane speaking and showing exactly what happened and must know it is disinformation.
VIDEO
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkc3C6csaHI @ about 10.08 onwards
Ah well!! Surprise, Surprise !! Someone has done something to the video and it wont work, but it left the space . 8(>(( Anyway Janes Rogatory statement says it all. Her own words, not someone elses and in Kate and Gerrys case at least twice repeated … in other words nothing more than Chinese Whispers... and from a couple, Kate and Gerry who were totally exhausted and merely repeating hearsay. THEY BOTH SAID TO SPEAK TO JANE ABOUT IT. Why did you ignore that?
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JANE_TANNER_RIGATORY.htm -snip- 4078 “How far away from you were they at the closest point?”
[re the man and the carried child] Reply “Phew, as, I mean, it’s hard to, sort of thing, but I think I was sort of halfway, it’s probably sort of five metres, I mean, I’m trying to sort of think in terms of this room, but sort of probably just further than that wall, probably sort of five to ten metres id’ say, if, I don’t know how far it is to there, but”.
4078 “I would say probably about, I am just guessing, but two and a half to three metres?”
Reply “Yeah, I’d probably say sort of five, five to ten metres, well probably five, nearer five”. -snip-
So Pathfimder, you chose to believe the two statements that were relayed by a secondary person twice at least [Chinese Whispers] rather than a video showing Jane in person very deliberately pointing out where she saw Gerry and Jez .
You have seen this video, Pathfinder, it has been played numerous times on this forum before. You saw her walk straight up the road to the top where she saw Tannerman and ?Madeleine? crossing and going in an easterly direction along Rua Agostinho. Jane did NOT go along the back pathway as you keep saying. Please desist.
And now you have the Rogatory statement with Jane HERSELF saying how she was only about 5 - 10 metres away from this man when she saw him, NOT 50 metres.
I hope and trust that you will not try it on again, repeating all your disinformation in a few months/ years time.
