New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[barrier]

Did someone not write asking why the Smithman photofits were not on their website and they replied that they were no longer persons of interest, or some such?

Wasn't it because of an upgrade to their site?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Wasn't it because of an upgrade to their site?

I have no idea, but for years there were no photofits of Smithman on their website if I recall correctly.

[barrier]

I have no idea, but for years there were no photofits of Smithman on their website if I recall correctly.

Think this answers it,they'll not disclose it.

https://www.met.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/foi-media/metropolitan-police/disclosure_2018/june_2018/information-rights-unit---various-questions-about-operation-grange

[Vertigo Swirl]

A man seen by many eye witnesses carrying who they believe was Madeleine McCann at the time she disappeared is no longer a person of interest. What Nonsense!

you’ve obviously forgotten this post you wrote last year


Online pathfinder73
Hero Member
*****
 
Posts: 8465
Total likes: 1845
Just One More Thing
View Profile  Email  Personal Message (Online)

Re: Is it true the PJ may have "Smithman" on video?
« Reply #254 on: July 09, 2019, 12:45:23 AM »
Quote
These efits were received by the Operation Grange team in September 2008
as part of a dossier of material handed to the MPS by private
investigators that had been working on the case.  The MPS will not comment
on whether identifications have or have not been made however the efits do
not form part of any current appeal.

Should you have any further enquiries concerning this matter, please
contact me on 0207 161 3583 or via email at [email address],
quoting the reference number above.

Yours sincerely

David Edwards

[Vertigo Swirl]

Vindicated!

[barrier]

Vindicated!

Not part of any appeal,there was no appeal for info.

[pathfinder73]

Vindicated!

Current appeal. Smithman is the ace!

[Vertigo Swirl]

Not part of any appeal,there was no appeal for info.

And why would that be do you suppose?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Current appeal. Smithman is the ace!

Deluded.

[jassi]

An interesting and informative article here - https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jun/04/madeleine-mccann-suspect-christian-bruckner-fled-police-in-1995

[barrier]

An interesting and informative article here - https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jun/04/madeleine-mccann-suspect-christian-bruckner-fled-police-in-1995

Circumstantial at best it seems.


There is a lot of circumstantial evidence against the man, but no proof.

[jassi]

Circumstantial at best it seems.

We only know what has been announced, but little of any substance, it would seem.

I am wondering why they are confident that it was him who had this long telephone conversation.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

Compared to the Smith efits.

That’s just chaff or you’re presuming without evidence that only one person was involved.

[Vertigo Swirl]

An interesting and informative article here - https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jun/04/madeleine-mccann-suspect-christian-bruckner-fled-police-in-1995

Sickening.  No wonder he kept going back to Portugal, he knew he could get away with all sorts there, so inept were the local police.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

Sickening.  No wonder he kept going back to Portugal, he knew he could get away with all sorts there, so inept were the local police.

Surely it is equally inept to start a missing child case by refusing to investigate any possibility that there may be some close family involvement. Such a premise is (or rather was) unheard of.