Police would have to prove
a) CB owned the original device from which the material originated
b) the original device was in his possession at the time the material was recorded prior to uploading
c) no-one else except CB had access to the device
d) CB's image was present on any digital material recovered related to Madeleine's death.
That’s not correct.
The fact the memory stick was on Christian Brueckner’s Land is enough evidence it belonged to him. How do you think they catch paedophiles in the UK who download images on their home computers? When the police raid and take the computers, if they find image son there they charge the owner of that computer. The owner can’t turn round and say “I didn’t download it, a friend did”, because it belongs to them and therefore they’re responsible.
And what jury or judge would believe a stranger would have hidden that memory stick under CB’s dead dog?
And don’t you think they’ve got all the DNA off it?
And why would he hide it?
None of those excuses would wash at all.
Some paedophiles have tried all that in the past, and they’ve never got away with it. People aren’t stupid...