New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Mr Gray]

Which is of course what the McCann's always said about Madeleine being dead.

You have completely missed the point..CB knows for certain whether he's innocent or not...he doesn't need to go by the evifence

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

You have completely missed the point..CB knows for certain whether he's innocent or not...he doesn't need to go by the evifence

What does that have to do with "statement analysis" and his lawyer?

Is he the first new suspect that you thought was "might be"  guilty or the latest in a line?

[G-Unit]

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12016330/madeleine-mccann-suspect-phone-link/

Nick Pisa
2 Jul 2020, 22:00Updated: 2 Jul 2020, 22:06
MADELEINE McCann police are probing a “promising” new lead following a TV appeal.

A viewer of Germany’s Crimewatch called cops to say they recognised a mobile number that suspect Christian B is said to have phoned on the night Madeleine vanished.

Police now hope to trace the Portuguese number’s owner. They are also checking banks in Portugal to see if it was topped up at an ATM.

In the new TV appeal about three-year-old Madeleine’s 2007 disappearance, German police urged viewers to check diaries and contacts books to see if they recognised the number.

As the show ended, detective Alfred Hettmer revealed: “There have been 16 calls about this number and one of them is promising.”

The caller had contacted police in Bavaria — significant because that is where convicted paedo B lived before moving to Portugal.

Germany’s Federal Criminal Police Office urged the viewer to get in touch with them.

Met Police data shared with the Germans has put B’s own mobile close to the Ocean Club where the McCanns were holidaying.

Close to the Ocean Club? That makes no real sense. Would that be the Ocean Club reception on R. Direita, the Tapas complex on R. Dr F G Martins or the Millenium complex on R. J R Lopez? Could it be near to the Tapas complex but on R. 1 de Maio?

[Mr Gray]

What does that have to do with "statement analysis" and his lawyer?

Is he the first new suspect that you thought was "might be"  guilty or the latest in a line?

The first thst looks highly probable

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

The first thst looks highly probable

Were the others just probables then?

[VIXTE]

Which is of course what the McCann's always said about Madeleine being dead.

There is a difference.
Madeleine's parents ARE NOT accused by police or any LE of being suspects while CB is being accused publically by a public prosecutor who also claims that there is evidence.
I hope this is not hard to comprehend.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

There is a difference.
Madeleine's parents ARE NOT accused by police or any LE of being suspects while CB is being accused publically by a public prosecutor who also claims that there is evidence.
I hope this is not hard to comprehend.

But tongues were wagging and GM said "there's no evidence to implicate us in her death". That's odd on its own given he also consistently claimed "there's no evidence she is dead"... Granted though there is a difference between "lack of evidence" and "no evidence".... Then again, perhaps the German was badly translated!!. And it's only hearsay from CB's lawyer - it's not the words of the latest suspect himself.....

As you know this isn't of any relevance. Court cases are decided on the evidence and the evidence alone. It would take a pretty shoddy defence lawyer not to argue that there is "a lack of evidence" against their client.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

[misty]

Close to the Ocean Club? That makes no real sense. Would that be the Ocean Club reception on R. Direita, the Tapas complex on R. Dr F G Martins or the Millenium complex on R. J R Lopez? Could it be near to the Tapas complex but on R. 1 de Maio?

Sometimes it is possible for experts to work out a more precise location of a mobile phone call by looking at data showing strength of the signal received at the mast(s). I believe there were 3 masts in & around Luz which may have provided such data.
The important matter now for the Germans is to identify the other caller. It may just turn out to be one of his girlfriends.

[VIXTE]

But tongues were wagging and GM said "there's no evidence to implicate us in her death". That's odd on its own given he also consistently claimed "there's no evidence she is dead"... Granted though there is a difference between "lack of evidence" and "no evidence".... Then again, perhaps the German was badly translated!!. And it's only hearsay from CB's lawyer - it's not the words of the latest suspect himself.....

As you know this isn't of any relevance. Court cases are decided on the evidence and the evidence alone. It would take a pretty shoddy defence lawyer not to argue that there is "a lack of evidence" against their client.

I hope you are able to distinguish between the manipulative language use you are trying to implement to pursue your opinion, I am not sure why - maybe it could be some social media phenomena syndrome and the actual FACTS: We are in 2020 now and there is a new investigation going on. This time in Germany.

[Holly Goodhead]

I remember too, Davel

Maybe Holly has a heavy workload...she’s putting in overtime on the Bamber case, and trying to exonerate Buerbecker  too now...the stress!

Poor Bamber will get jealous if he hears she’s taken on CB !

Actually, I think even Bamber would take CB out for what he’s done.

And yes, I definitely guarantee CB will be charged and convicted.

It probably didn't register given the interviewer asked if he had irrefutable evidence to which he replied we have strong evidence....so no irrefutable evidence.

[Mr Gray]

It probably didn't register given the interviewer asked if he had irrefutable evidence to which he replied we have strong evidence....so no irrefutable evidence.

semantics obviously.....irrefutable evidence would be proof. What I think we can can assume is there is strong evidence.

[Mr Gray]

It probably didn't register given the interviewer asked if he had irrefutable evidence to which he replied we have strong evidence....so no irrefutable evidence.

You claimed to have solved the case around a year ago. to make this claim...did you have concrete evidence...irrefutable evidence...or just very weak evidence. I think its the latter

[G-Unit]

Sometimes it is possible for experts to work out a more precise location of a mobile phone call by looking at data showing strength of the signal received at the mast(s). I believe there were 3 masts in & around Luz which may have provided such data.
The important matter now for the Germans is to identify the other caller. It may just turn out to be one of his girlfriends.

Three masts? I thought there were two.

[Mr Gray]

Three masts? I thought there were two.

I don't think anyone here  really knows....apart from thr police of course...and I don't think anyone here knows how accurate the location is.